Just like riding a bike

By Gary Smith

This article will sort of be all over the place however the main gist of it will be the fact that after 52 years I haven’t forgotten how to develop film. I realize that this is a skill that most all of you have mastered and it’s good to know that even after many years it’s one you won’t forget.

So, imagine yourself at 18, having just purchased your first good camera: a brand new Canon FTb. I was a senior in high school and had been taking an introduction to photography class for 8 months. We were primarily working in black and white and my first camera for the class was a borrowed Voigtländer VITO CLR rangefinder. The Canon boasted a “quick load” capability that allowed you to simply lay your film across the take-up sprocket and close the back where a plate came down over the film to ensure you were good to go. Since I had recently had two blank rolls come out of both of my Leicas, I was glad to be loading the idiot-proof FTb – a nostalgia purchase in 2022. Back in the day, I never had anything other than the normal 50mm lens for my FTb however these days I find that I usually have a medium zoom on most of my digitals. My local camera shop had a couple of used Canon fd zooms for what I thought was a good price, so I ventured over to the St.John’s district of Portland in search of a zoom. I had initially planned on getting a 70-210 f4 for $60 but I opted instead for the 75-200 f4 for $70 because of the size of the lens.

One other issue that the replacement FTb has is a battery. The OEM battery for this camera in 1972 was a 1.35v M20 mercury battery. They’re not made any longer due to the environmental issues with mercury. I solved the battery problem on my 2022 purchase with a Wein cell. These cells don’t last as long as the original mercury cells which could go as long as 10 years. When I decided to add the “new-to-me” 75-210 zoom, I also needed a new battery. They are readily available on Amazon here in the USA for around $5 a pop (so I got three).

I knew that 52 years ago, my darkroom had quite a stench largely due to the Acetic Acid. I’m currently in a house with not nearly enough room for a dedicated darkroom but my biggest concern was my wife’s chemical sensitivities. I knew that processing film the way I did as a kid wasn’t going to fly. I pondered going with caffenol but in the end I decided to try Cinestill’s Df96 monobath. Since I’d be working on the corner of a table in the garage next to a sink only having to worry about a single chemical seemed an easy way to go.

A quick trip to eBay secured a developing tank just like the one I used in high school. With the addition of a couple of pitchers, a thermometer, a squeegee and some distilled water and Adoflo, I was all set.

I laid out my film canister, a can opener, scissors and the disassembled tank in my bedroom closet (with the door closed and a towel on the floor to block any stray light) and set about opening the film can and winding the spool. You may recall that I end two rolls that ended up blank – one of which I did here and had some trouble winding the spool. This time there were no problems, and the film loaded just fine onto the spool.

The temperature in my garage seems to stay a comfortable 74 degrees F (that would be 23 C for those of you in the rest of the world) so I simply monitored the temperature of the bottle of distilled water and based my development time off that. I went with 4 minutes in the tank with 30 seconds of agitation followed by a couple of swirls every 30 seconds after that. The tank comes with a thermometer that engages the spool allowing agitation without inversion. I followed the Df96 with a rinse of tap water, followed by a second rinse of tap water, followed by a final rinse with distilled water with a drop or two of Adoflo. Opened the tank, shook out the spool, stripped out the film and voila: I was back in the developing business! I don’t recall using a squeegee all those years ago but did so this time before hanging the film to dry from the overhead garage door track.

After letting the film dry I was ready for the next step: scanning. I had previously purchased a Valoi Easy 35 and scanned some lab-developed negatives with my 24mp APS-C Sony and both the 50/2.8 and 100/2.8 macro lenses. Following that trial, I purchased a 50/2.8 FF macro and scanned these newly developed shots with the 42mp FF Sony a7R3. With this et-up and a small amount of trim, my scans ended up being 39.7mp. Once you have figured out the number of tubes needed between the light box and the camera, using the Valoi is a snap.

The film feeds through one side, you visually center the frame and use a remote to trigger the shutter. I only had to focus once on the first exposure – a process made easier using focus peaking.

I have to say that I was really happy with how clean my negatives were and how nice the scans turned out. The above image is of a bronze sculpture of an elk that is actually life-size and sitting on the roof of the sculpture’s studio in Troutdale, OR. The resulting positive is below.

To be truthful, I was anxious to burn through the 24 exposures of Tri-X but it still took me two or three sessions. The shots are kind of “throw aways” but not completely. I shot the bronze fish the same night as I shot the bronze elk.

I can’t vouch for the quality of the whiskey but it looked golden in the evening sunset (same night as the above two shots).  Despite being spelled with an “e” I have no idea if this is Scotch, Bourbon or Irish Whiskey. I do know it is a local and their web site claims it’s an American whiskey (so I’m thinking Bourbon).

I’d been past this old mill in Oregon City when the water going over the upstream falls was epic, unfortunately it hasn’t rained here in Oregon for about two months and the river has been down. I had to content myself with shots of the mill rather than shots of the falls.

And what would a day be without a long perspective shot down the tracks? Portland has a light-rail system that goes about 15 miles east and west of downtown. This shot is from the Gresham City Hall station looking west (towards Portland).

All of the above shots were metered in the FTb and shot on Tri-X using the 75-200 zoom. The resulting scans were processed using Affinity Photo v2 and the Nik Collection Silver Efex Pro v2.

I have to say that I was pleased with the Wein cell driving the meter, the lens performance, the Cinestill Df96 monobath and the 39mp scans that I got using my FF Sony and the Valoi Easy35. I still have 3 rolls of Tri-X that I want to push through the Df96 before it turns impotent and I guess the rolls of 120 will need to be sent out (I’m not ready to tackle color or rig up a scan set-up for 120 film).

Share this post:

Find more similar content on 35mmc

Use the tags below to search for more posts on related topics:

Contribute to 35mmc for an ad-free experience.

There are two ways to contribute to 35mmc and experience it without the adverts:

Paid Subscription – £2.99 per month and you’ll never see an advert again! (Free 3-day trial).

Subscribe here.

Content contributor – become a part of the world’s biggest film and alternative photography community blog. All our Contributors have an ad-free experience for life.

Sign up here.

About The Author

By Gary Smith
Lived in various US metro-areas from the east coast, south, Midwest and Pacific Northwest while chasing a career. Currently retired and living outside Portland, Oregon. Shooting film again (as well as developing). Have a mix of digital and film cameras and lenses in various formats.
View Profile

Comments

Ken Rowin on Just like riding a bike

Comment posted: 01/10/2024

Nice photos and a good story. I started developing film in the kitchen sink, then moved to a laundry room sink and for the last 25 years a dedicated darkroom sink. Never tried the mono bath method which seems to have given you great results. Bravo on your return to developing.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Gary Smith replied:

Comment posted: 01/10/2024

Thanks Ken! I have to say that I enjoyed shooting the FTb again (and with something other than the 50). The mono bath worked well and so far it has given me good results. Ill be curious to see how well it does after a little time on the shelf.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Geoff Chaplin on Just like riding a bike

Comment posted: 01/10/2024

Well done! If its the stop bath smell your wife can't stand then Rodinal stand development, 100:1 dilution, only needs a water stop (or none at all) and then the fix. Very inexpensive, very long lasting.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Gary Smith on Just like riding a bike

Comment posted: 01/10/2024

Thanks Geoff! I have no idea what's going to bother my wife's nose. The mono bath only requires water to stop and fix. It's unlikely that I'll ever look at these negatives again so if they're not well fixed, I'll never know.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Bill Brown on Just like riding a bike

Comment posted: 01/10/2024

I have an FTb that I purchased used in 1977 that I'm still shooting with. The match needle metering is so simple and the film loading so reliable. The battery I use says PX625 and I purchased it at a local camera store. The metering seems to be accurate. I haven't developed my own film in decades but I still have everything I used boxed up in my garage. Dallas has been lucky enough to recently get a new lab with a dip & dunk developing system. One of only two in Texas. Your scanning rig seems to be giving you nice results as well. From the looks of what's posted here it seems like you might be ready to sit on the handlebars and pedal backwards. Good work.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Gary Smith replied:

Comment posted: 01/10/2024

I don't know about going backwards, seems Id at least have to have an enlarger for that. Come to think of it, that would solve my printer problem too!

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Tony Warren on Just like riding a bike

Comment posted: 01/10/2024

Great stuff, Gary. Very interested in the results using the monobath - impressive and one to consider when my Rodinal finally runs out. I use two fingers as a squeegee running the film between them. I got scratches when I used a rubber one many years ago. The copier is a neat bit of kit too. Do they make a multi-format version do you know? Thanks again for a useful post and glad you had sucha good outcome. It would be a little worrying I am sure.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Tony Warren replied:

Comment posted: 01/10/2024

Ah - it seems they do have a multi-format version having found the web site. I'll stick to my present method. Good solution though.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Gary Smith replied:

Comment posted: 01/10/2024

Thanks Tony! I don't believe they support 120mm. There may be inserts for smaller films.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *