5 Frames with a Canon Canonet QI17 GIII and Fujifilm 400

By Eric

I recently picked up a copy of a Canon Canonet QL17 GIII that showed up at my local camera shop. This is not a new camera to me. I have had and also wrote a KEH review for it in the past. It’s a great camera. I wrote a welcome back post where I visited my “reasoning” for letting it go. Bottom line I was wrong and so I bought this copy. So… welcome back

What I like about the camera.

  • It is a rangefinder (My minor obsession with rangefinder cameras is well documented on my blog.)
  • Has a bright lens at f/1.7.
  • The 40mm focal length is a favorite of mine.
  • Pleasing image quality.
  • It is a fine-looking little camera.
  • It is well-built and feels good in hand.
  • Easy to load film.
  • Has exposure automation (It is shutter priority as opposed to my usual favorite aperture priority, but this works fine in practice. I just have to be mindful of the aperture markings in the viewfinder.)
  • Full manual is available but there will be no exposure reading.

Did I need it? Nope. But I do not technically need a film camera. My prior justification for not picking one up was another small built-in lens rangefinder, the Konica C35 Automatic, but that camera takes the Automatic in its name very seriously. All you have control over is the focus.

Downsides.

Not much to note here.

I wish the price had stayed where it was when I picked up my first copy. This is not a reality nowadays and not the camera’s fault.

Otherwise, the rangefinder is usable but it lands somewhere around my Petry 7S in legibility, or a bit better, as opposed to my pretty solid Konica rangefinders. Comparing it to Leica would just be mean. So not best of breed but very usable. I cannot recall any focusing issues.

Moving on to the images.

While certain it was in working order I did put a roll through it to be safe. The film chosen was Fujfilm 400 and it was developed at home with Cinestill CS41. Nothing Earth-shattering. I quickly walked around a local town at dusk. In my experience, the Canonet struggles a bit with very low light. This copy was no different. The images I liked best tended to have more light. Here are my favorite 5 images from the roll.

That about wraps things up. Happy capturing..

Eric L. Woods

I shoot a variety of new and old digital and film cameras. Industrial Engineer by education, IT is my vocation, and I really enjoy using, testing, and writing about cameras. All three of the latter are very therapeutic exercises for me. If you are so inclined my blog address is ewoodsphoto.com and I can be found on Threads and Instagram. All the best to you.

Share this post:

Find more similar content on 35mmc

Use the tags below to search for more posts on related topics:

Contribute to 35mmc for an ad-free experience.

There are two ways to contribute to 35mmc and experience it without the adverts:

Paid Subscription – £2.99 per month and you’ll never see an advert again! (Free 3-day trial).

Subscribe here.

Content contributor – become a part of the world’s biggest film and alternative photography community blog. All our Contributors have an ad-free experience for life.

Sign up here.

About The Author

By Eric
I shoot a variety of new and old digital and film cameras. Industrial Engineer by education, IT is my vocation, and I really enjoy using, testing, and writing about cameras. All three of the latter are very therapeutic exercises for me.
View Profile

Comments

Erik Brammer on 5 Frames with a Canon Canonet QI17 GIII and Fujifilm 400

Comment posted: 03/11/2024

Hi Eric,

a very good article capturing the essence of this camera which I purchased to make it my beer camera, means when I go out and there might be a risk that I would drop the camera for whatever obscure reason. :-) After I had purchased mine, I realised that I better replace the light seals. Not that there were leaks, but they were falling apart, risking to put dirt on the film. Also I had to clean the viewfinder. Once again, Youtube came to rescue with some very helpful videos on how to go about that cleaning procedure. Pretty simple and straightforward.

Happy shooting with that little gem!
Erik
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Bob Janes on 5 Frames with a Canon Canonet QI17 GIII and Fujifilm 400

Comment posted: 03/11/2024

They are good little cameras - I find the Canonet shutter releases a little heavy in comparison to the Konicas, but they are wonderfully designed and put together. Both the Canonets that were part of the 'Travelling Canonet' project seem to have sunk beneath the waves, but they did both get almost half-way around the world before going dark...
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Erik Brammer replied:

Comment posted: 03/11/2024

The shutter release is indeed not the most pleasant experience compared to other cameras. But it's ok for a beer camera. :-)

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

James Hanes on 5 Frames with a Canon Canonet QI17 GIII and Fujifilm 400

Comment posted: 03/11/2024

I have a Canonet 1.7. One of my faves; much more user friendly than the huge earlier version with the meter's eye around the lens! To my index finger, the shutter button pressure is ideal. I wish it had more chrome accents, like the Konica.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Cdlinz on 5 Frames with a Canon Canonet QI17 GIII and Fujifilm 400

Comment posted: 04/11/2024

Kudos! I took a vaunted (and expensive) contax t2 to Italy and shot 12 rolls. Upon developing all I could think was my canonet would have performed better and been way more fun. Viva canonet!
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *