5 Frames with a Fed-2 – New aspects, old subject

By Peter Roberts

Following up our photo walk last year Tim Wainwright, Bob Janes and I met up at the end of May for another one. This time it was in Greenwich, familiar stomping ground for Bob and me but new to Tim.

It may be a symptom of getting older and being retired with the time to do it that I derive a lot of satisfaction in visiting places that I think I know well just to try and see a new aspect of them from a photographic point of view. The way that light falls at different times of the day (or night), the changing seasons and busy or quiet times if human interest is wanted; all these factors have a bearing on how I view subjects and react to them. As such another visit to Greenwich was fine with me.

Two other factors also come into play on this occasion. Firstly, for those of us with a perhaps just a few too many cameras using one in a familiar location is much more fun than a boring test card for testing and comparison purposes. With that in mind, on this occasion I had with me a Fed-2 which I hadn’t used for over ten years and the Pentax SP1000 which was the subject of my first 35mmc post. The Pentax was fronted by a Takumar bearing evidence of an equally interesting provenance. In the end it hardly came out of the bag so will have to wait for another time. Secondly, as Greenwich was new to Tim I felt as if I was put on my mettle and, to a certain extent, seeing it afresh and vicariously through his eyes.

The Fed-2

Summarising because it’s probably common knowledge, the Fed-2 was made in Kharkiv, Ukraine which was then part of the erstwhile Soviet Union. It was in production from 1955 to 1970 during which time it ran through six variants, with further variants within the variants, and a confusing serial numbering system. Julian Higgs gives it review here on 35mmc and a Google search will pull up more information some of which is contradictory.

Sifting through the evidence until I’d had enough mine appears to be a late 2d and with its rather attractive serial number of 6700700 may date to 1967. Then again it may not and is purely academic anyway. As with any camera the images that it is capable of producing matter more than its pedigree, interesting though that may be.

The Five Frames

Don’t be misled by the featured image which was taken after the event. I haven’t been doing very well as regards the weather lately whenever I’ve been in Greenwich. That day in May was no exception. It was cold, damp and overcast so I was glad that I had opted to load both cameras with Kentmere 400.

I’m rather partial to incongruous signs. I hadn’t noticed these before and was amused by the ambiguity and irony of them.

The hedonist and the developer

Apparently the hedonist sign was part of an art installation project some years ago and there are several others scattered around London. Also scattered around London these days, although not for any artistic purpose, are abandoned electric hire bikes. They’re usually to be found in the most inconvenient of places but this one wasn’t too bad.

Mobile installation?

One of the advantages of Greenwich is that there is much to see no matter what the weather. Here we are in The Queen’s House which I’m ashamed to say I hadn’t visited for a long time.

The Queen’s House looking up

 

The Queens House, looking down

 

The Queen;s House, looking inside out

By Way of Conclusion

I recall that my first impression of the Fed-2 was that it was fiddly to operate. Dusting it off and putting it through its paces after a period of time I was pleasantly surprised how much I enjoyed using it. Of course its controls are still fiddly and the lens, a rigid Industar 50, is awkward to focus without inadvertently changing the aperture but at least on my copy the rings turn freely and smoothly, the aperture ring perhaps too much so. The images produced appear to my eye to have nice tones and while not razor sharp have an attractive period look to them which I’d like to think is apparent in the shots I’ve chosen to include here.

It’s a camera I really ought to get to know better, if only for the challenge and fun of it.

Thank you for reading.

Share this post:

Find more similar content on 35mmc

Use the tags below to search for more posts on related topics:

Contribute to 35mmc for an ad-free experience.

There are two ways to contribute to 35mmc and experience it without the adverts:

Paid Subscription – £2.99 per month and you’ll never see an advert again! (Free 3-day trial).

Subscribe here.

Content contributor – become a part of the world’s biggest film and alternative photography community blog. All our Contributors have an ad-free experience for life.

Sign up here.

About The Author

By Peter Roberts
Recently retired railwayman with a lifelong interest in all things photographic. A self-professed saddo: other interests include classic cars and model railways.
View Profile

Comments

Richard de Bulat on 5 Frames with a Fed-2 – New aspects, old subject

Comment posted: 06/08/2024

I have a Fed 2 and it is one of my favourite cameras. I have swapped out the Industar lens and replaced it with an old canon lens. Having said that that Industar lenses have a character all of their own. Nice set of images!
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Peter Roberts replied:

Comment posted: 06/08/2024

Thanks, Richard. I agree that Industar lens lenses have a certain rugged appeal to them. And while I would love to try other M39 lenses prices of even the humblest are rocketing.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Michael Zwicky-Ross on 5 Frames with a Fed-2 – New aspects, old subject

Comment posted: 06/08/2024

Very nice photographs, thank you. Living 300 miles from Greenwich I don't get there very often so it's good to see the Queen's House again. Now of course I want a Fed 2...
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Peter Roberts replied:

Comment posted: 06/08/2024

Thanks, Richard. It was pure luck that we adjurned to the Queen's House so I'm really pleased you liked those shots. Best of luck if you decide to go hunting for a Fed 2.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Miguel Mendez on 5 Frames with a Fed-2 – New aspects, old subject

Comment posted: 06/08/2024

Son muy buenas fotos . Un saludo desde Argentina.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Peter Roberts replied:

Comment posted: 06/08/2024

Muchos gracias por tu comentario, Miguel. Lo aprecio.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Russ Rosener on 5 Frames with a Fed-2 – New aspects, old subject

Comment posted: 06/08/2024

Several years ago a friend gave me a Fed 2 with Industar 22 lens. I always loved the Barack style Leica III series and the Fed 2 handles a little better with the single window. It's actually a very nice rangefinder camera! Trivia: The Fed 2 is the camera Picasso used to make his light painting experiments in the 1950s. I prefer the Soviet Jupiter 8 50mm lens because it's a Sonnar design.
Great photos and thanks for reminding me to shoot this cool little camera.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Peter Roberts replied:

Comment posted: 06/08/2024

Thanks Russ for these interesting comments. I did pick up that in some respects the Fed 2 could be considered an improvement on the Leica III series. Funnily enough ever since I acquired this Fed 2 I've been on the lookout for a Jupiter 8 for it at a reasonable price. The Picasso connection is fascinating and something I wasn't aware of.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Gary Smith on 5 Frames with a Fed-2 – New aspects, old subject

Comment posted: 06/08/2024

Wondering at the depth of your camera inventory and how many "5 Frames with..." you likely have to go Peter. For some reason I like the Queen's House Inside Out shot.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Peter Roberts replied:

Comment posted: 06/08/2024

Oh, there may be a few more yet, Gary. Perhaps even something I shot over the weekend. As I actually planned it to be a Five Frames it may fall flat! The Inside Out shot is my favourite too although like you I don't know why/

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Fred Nelson on 5 Frames with a Fed-2 – New aspects, old subject

Comment posted: 08/08/2024

Peter: Nice article. I'm going to pick up a Fed 2 soon. Hopefully I can master it!
Any words of wisdom as I shop for one!
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Peter Roberts replied:

Comment posted: 08/08/2024

Thanks for commenting, Fred. Words of wisdom? I'll do my best. The most important thing to look out for and which is mentioned whenever Fed 2s are discussed is that the shutter speed shound never ever be adjusted until the film is wound on and the shutter cocked. The winder, the speed dial and the shutter cock are all mechanically connected and to change speed without cocking the shutter will damage the mechanism, usually with fatal results. If you come across a Fed 2 with a jammed winding knob or shutter speeds that sound off it is probably a sign that this has happened. You'll see evidence that the mechanism is working correctly as the speed dial moves through 360 degrees as the winding knob is turned. To alter the shutter speed (after the film has been advanced) the collar on the top of the dial should be pulled up to enable it to be turned to the chosen speed. Do not force it without lifting as again this will cause damage. If the view through the finder appears blurred don't forget that there's a lever below the rewind knob that adjusts its dioptre setting. It makes a huge difference to get this in the right postition for your eye but it can easily be nudged out of place when handling the camera. The film take up spool is detachable and slides out which makes for easy loading. I suppose it's possible that you may find a camera with this missing. If so I guess that the spindle removed from a 35mm film cannister could be used as a sustitute. As with with any Soviet camera light leaks can come with the territory. Mine has a slight one that occasionally makes itself known at the very edge of the film but not enough to worry unduly about. The focussing ring on the lens may have stiffened over the years due to the hardening of the grease on the helix. On the rigid Industar on mine this is easily get atable by removing the bezel that is engraved the aperture and distance scales. It is clamped in place by three screws which only need slacking off with a jewellers' screwdriver. There is no need to remove them completely and then struggle to re-thread them, assuming you haven't already lost them (I'll leave you to guess how I know that!) Once the bezel is removed the helix is exposed and hardened grease can be softened and removed using lighter fluid. A liitle silcon lubricant can then be applied to the thread if necessary. On a personal note, I find the Fed 2 is a camera which in use really does benefit from one of those fancy shutter release buttons that screw into the cable release thread. I hope this has been helpful and hasn't put you off a Fed 2. If in doubt, walk away. Best of luck in your hunt for one.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *