Photo of front of Rollei XF 35

Rollei XF 35 – First Impressions

By Sebastian Shields

I ran into this camera almost by accident. I was meandering through a vinyl record and camera store* and saw the small Rollei XF 35 hiding in a glass counter next to the register. I had been looking for a smaller 35mm camera for a while, browsing anything from Pentax point-and-shoots to Zeiss Ikon fixed lens cameras. I figured since I hadn’t bought anything photography-related for a while, I’d give it a shot.

*Gentry Studio / John’s Camera Corner in Blacksburg, Virginia

This is just a part of one wall in the store. I am highly considering interviewing the owner as he seems very interesting.

Specs

The Rollei XF 35 is a fixed-lens rangefinder released in 1974. A highlight would be the 40mm f/2.3 Sonnar lens, produced by Zeiss. It is, of course, manual focus, although it is fully automated other than that. The camera will choose between f/16 at 1/650th of a second to f/2.3 at 1/30th of a second. (You can use Bulb mode as well.) The ISO is selectable between 25-400.

Powering all of this requires a PX-625 mercury battery. These Mercury batteries are no longer available. Also, almost all modern 625 batteries are 1.5V, while the intended battery is 1.35V. This, however, can be resolved with an MRB625 battery from the likes of Weincell. These match the intended 1.35v battery’s voltage and are mercury-free. Something interesting happens if you decide to use the cheaper and more common 1.5v battery though. Running the 1.5v battery essentially changes the ISO range by pushing it a bit over 2-stops, so say ~160 to ~2000 ISO. This would give *an* option for shooting films faster than 400. I will say I have not experimented with this, and it would require testing. (I wouldn’t be surprised if the higher sensitivity at the 1600 range is unreliable.)

Size comparison for the Rollei XF 35, (Compared to a GoPro Hero 10 and a Pentax K1000)

Build

The Rollei XF 35 is small, angular, and refined looking. The largely metal build is cohesive to it feeling very solid and premium. The build also makes it feel durable enough to not worry when tossing it into a bag. The exception to this is the rewind lever, which does feel a bit cheap. This is exacerbated by its looseness (at least on my example.) Of course, the camera is around 50 years old, and it doesn’t feel like it’ll break, just loose. In my experience the rangefinder is bright, though depending on how well taken care of your example is, it could be slightly misaligned. This Rollei is not especially heavy, but it has a nice, evenly distributed weight which makes it feel great in the hands.

The first word I thought of when describing the design of the Rollei XF 35 is suave. Black on black with subtle accents for lettering gives this Rollei a very subdued yet stylish presentation. Another note, the small, cargo-pants pocketable size and lack of bright silver bottom and top plates gives a nice discreteness to the camera. This makes the camera great for street photography, especially when you don’t love confrontation.

Rollei XF 35 – Ilford HP5+ 400
Rollei XF 35 – Ilford HP5+ 400
Rollei XF 35 – Ilford HP5+ 400

Personal Experience and Opinions

The Rollei XF 35 is best approached from the mindset of a point-and-shoot, and not a Rollei 35 with a Rangefinder. It may be slightly bigger than the original 35, but still, in the world of premium point and shoots, the XF 35 does great. No you don’t have manual controls, and yes it requires a battery, but this means you can often find them at half the price of the original 35. There are plenty of reasons you might want this camera over a real 35 too. The film loading is way easier and much more normal, focusing the rangefinder is easier than scale-focusing, and the Auto shooting makes it convenient for quick in-the-moment photography. Of course, this may not be the camera for you, but it doesn’t have to be, and these provide a great option for those looking for a small but well-built point-and-shoot at a more reasonable price than many other offerings.

All in all, I have thoroughly enjoyed the camera so far. 40mm is a nice focal length for daily use, especially in my current surroundings. I don’t have to get too “in your face” for street photography, but I also don’t have to worry about not being able to fit a whole scene in the frame. Taking the camera around has been pleasant. It doesn’t take up much space, and I don’t feel like I am missing out on many of the manual controls in my day-to-day shooting. I have other cameras for more specific photography needs anyways. There are few reasons not to bring it with me with all of its convenience. So far I’ve found the XF 35 to be somewhat of a hidden gem, and I am excited to continue shooting mine.

Two large american sedans, one from the 90s, one from the 70s, parked next to each other
Rollei XF 35 – Ilford HP5+ 400
Photo of barn with mountains in background
Rollei XF 35 – Ilford HP5+ 400
Photo of imported Honda Integra near car parts store
Rollei XF 35 – Ilford HP5+ 400

Feel free to check out my Instagram!

Share this post:

Find more similar content on 35mmc

Use the tags below to search for more posts on related topics:

Contribute to 35mmc for an ad-free experience.

There are two ways to contribute to 35mmc and experience it without the adverts:

Paid Subscription – £2.99 per month and you’ll never see an advert again! (Free 3-day trial).

Subscribe here.

Content contributor – become a part of the world’s biggest film and alternative photography community blog. All our Contributors have an ad-free experience for life.

Sign up here.

About The Author

By Sebastian Shields
Photographer out of Maine, Currently in Virginia studying Industrial Design.
View Profile

Comments

Harry Machold on Rollei XF 35 – First Impressions

Comment posted: 06/11/2024

I always preferred this Rollei to any other Rollei 35.
It has a nice feeling to grip the camera, comes with a wider aperture lens of incredible sharpness from Carl Zeiss.
and it has a rangefinder and the lack of one in the Rollei 35 is a no go for me.
My late father had several Rollei 35 and was in the need for them for replacement reason since he tend to ruin the cameras while sitting on them occasionally, with the lens still extended when skiing...
To make the lens collapsing again was at times an issue.
One more interesting thing; while checking Peter Coeln´s warehouse in Vienna back then, I came across of a few Rollei XF 35, made from plastic...
Those I also found later in my life occasionally.
To distinct one from the other, I suggest a "confirming kiss" of the top plate (No, I am not perverse...)
It feels cold, then it is the metal version; warmer means the plastic one...
But thank you for the enlightening article; I will re-activate my several Rollei XF in the days to come
Harry Machold
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sebastian Shields replied:

Comment posted: 06/11/2024

I do have the metal version luckily. I honestly would not have expected Rollei to have made plastic ones! I do like the weight of my example with the metal top and bottom plate.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Art Meripol on Rollei XF 35 – First Impressions

Comment posted: 06/11/2024

I need to get back to Blacksburg!
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Alan Wilder on Rollei XF 35 – First Impressions

Comment posted: 13/11/2024

I know next to nothing about the camera but having a 40/2.3 Sonnar with rangefinder makes it an attractive package. Unfortunately, when checking with others, reliability is an issue. The restricted program only mode is another negative aspect making it more suitable for casual P&S shooters rather than advanced amateur shooters.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

James Evidon on Rollei XF 35 – First Impressions

Comment posted: 26/11/2024

The focus appears a bit soft. I would think that the Sonnar lens would give better sharpness and edge contrast. Have you had the RF checked for accuracy?
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *