Polachrome Polapan CT – A short-lived introduction from Polaroid

By Tony Warren

Back in the 1980s Polaroid were busy exploring alternative outlets for their almost unique process, having seen off Kodak who tried to muscle in on the act. Other factors led to their downfall with a subsequent revival (The Impossible Project etc.) much later and in other hands.

I suppose Edwin Land was something of a George Eastman, Henry Ford or Elon Musk of his day, thinking well and truly outside the box and not really caring much about what anyone thought of his work. Very single-minded. His products were effectively overtaken, first by conventional materials and then, like almost everything else at a commercial level, by digital.

Land’s process, as most will know, involved developing each exposure individually, either by an applied processing compound after exposure or one integral with the emulsion in increasingly sophisticated and elegant ways. For me, the SX-70 was the high point but there were many more designs produced during Polaroid’s time on the stage including the monster 20×24.

Immingham docks at night.
Immingham docks at night.

I recently came across these couple of shots I had made on a short-lived Polaroid product from the 1980s called Polachrome Polapan CT, sold in 12 and 36 exposure versions. Despite the “chrome” in the name it was a black and white reversal film which was developed by the user in a simple processor with separate developer packs. The film and developer were brought together in the processor after the film had been exposed, so not instant photography as such, just a reduced wait. I believe I can only have tried the one film, probably 12 exposure as I cannot find any other results.

There were other films in the range, including a colour transparency version, using the same equipment. The processor also incorporated a cutter to trim the film for slide mounting. Interestingly, the film appeared after Land had resigned and possibly was born out of the disastrous cine film introduced shortly before which severely impacted the firm financially and led to his resignation I understand.

I would have been using a simple model of the Praktica of around that time with fairly run of the mill optics but the quality of these results speak highly for both emulsion and equipment.

I doubt that the dockside image would be possible any more. Back then, both here at Immingham and at nearby Grimsby’s docks access was pretty unrestricted. I almost ended up in the water as well. I hadn’t noticed the ship that was supporting one of my legs and one of the tripod’s was gently rolling in the slight breeze. Fortunately I realised in time and rescued both myself and the camera before the gap widened too far and we found ourselves in the drink.

Those were such simpler times both socially and technologically.

Share this post:

Find more similar content on 35mmc

Use the tags below to search for more posts on related topics:

Contribute to 35mmc for an ad-free experience.

There are two ways to contribute to 35mmc and experience it without the adverts:

Paid Subscription – £2.99 per month and you’ll never see an advert again! (Free 3-day trial).

Subscribe here.

Content contributor – become a part of the world’s biggest film and alternative photography community blog. All our Contributors have an ad-free experience for life.

Sign up here.

About The Author

By Tony Warren
In my 60 or so years of serious involvement in photography I have seen the demise of the viewfinder, the rise of the SLR and the eclipse of them all with the meteoric development of the digital camera. Through it all, however, and above all else, the image is what it is all about so I now use film alongside digital. Whatever is the most appropriate or practical. My contributions will hopefully be useful for anyone interested in using film and also how a died-in-the-wool antique like me is continuing his life-long addiction in the digital age, using both platforms. The major benefit of an extended retirement is that I can spend most of my time nowadays with photography and writing about it.
View Profile

Comments

Jorge Roman on Polachrome Polapan CT – A short-lived introduction from Polaroid

Comment posted: 07/11/2024

One problem with 35 mm polachrome in color or monochrome was that’ problems developed if film past date
I always have used well past dated film with Polaroid,s developing strip would stick to film if overaged, ruining film
High contrast version was my choice for making slides for lectures and a life savior since I was often late drawing slides
Welcome PowerPoint!
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Tony Warren replied:

Comment posted: 07/11/2024

Thanks for the comments Jorge. That was Polaroids big advantage wasn't it. Its immediacy and convenience. Powerpoint was yet another nail in its coffin though.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Jeffery Luhn on Polachrome Polapan CT – A short-lived introduction from Polaroid

Comment posted: 07/11/2024

Tony, thanks for nice shots and a look back to a time of wonder. My favorite Polaroid film was the 4x5 Positive/negative ASA 50 black and white product. Amazing results! Of course, the color 4x5 and 2 1/4 size was indespensible for commercial work. I had months where the studio spent over $5,000 on Polaroid alone. I had to rein in my employees on that score. But having a color shot for the client to sign was a deal maker.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Tony Warren replied:

Comment posted: 07/11/2024

Thanks Jeffery. I guess commercial work was Polaroid's strength before digital but at eye watering money - wow. The studio group at my club even used a lash up I made from a sawn-off body with a folder lens/shutter grafted on. I never used the neg/pos - it was long gone when I got round to 5x4 but it must have been a really useful tool. Regards.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *