Get out and Photograph a Tree!

By CHRISTOF RAMPITSCH

Get out and photograph a tree because “the world is full of obvious things which nobody by any chance ever observes”. There’s a tree growing not far from where I live that I must have seen fifty times before noticing it. “You see, but you do not observe. The distinction is clear…” Holmes is my in head again. Just like Watson, I saw this tree but didn’t realize its potential. Or maybe it was the forced confinement of 2021 that made me photograph more locally? Here is the tree taken on my phone, this past summer. Nothing special, you’ll agree, in fact you can barely even see it.

An unremarkable tree. It’s a Bur Oak, a species that can get quite gnarly (Phone shot).

One day, while I was trying to photograph some birch trees that grow behind it (so much more photogenic don’t you know), I was wading through tall grass, stumbling on buried trunks, when I turned around and there it was. This new angle isolated it a bit, so I photographed it and here it is. I like the print, but I don’t love it and it now lives in an old Ilford box along with many friends. I wasn’t standing back far enough for the 150 mm lens – clearly: I didn’t even get the whole tree into the frame. I needed to go back and isolate it more. I should mention that all of my photos here are re-photographed prints, that’s why they may not be perfectly focused corner-to-corner.

Bur Oak tree, shot with an Intrepid 4×5 on HP5+ with a Sironar-N 150 mm lens and orange filter. 1/15 sec at f/22½, and developed in Ilford Perceptol stock for 11 minutes, 20 Celcius. Not quite there yet.
The birch trees that grow behind it. These are what I came to see originally. Exposed on Fomapan100 with a Rodenstock Apo Ronar 240 mm lens, 1/4sec at f/45½, developed in Rodinal, 9 min, and then printed on Ilford MGFB paper using E72.

I like the lone tree motif in B&W, even though lone trees can be hard to print because an overly bright sky can easily make you under-expose the trunk and bark. Just remember to expose for the shadows! This isn’t exactly a lone tree, but it has a nice shape to it and if I moved back a tad next time, it might just fit into my frame. There was not a lot of room to move around here though.

The tree still didn’t stand out from the background enough. Maybe a different angle could isolate it more? A wider lens would help too, and I had one now, a Schneider Angulon 90mm f/6.8 recently purchased and serviced. I definitely had to get the whole tree in the frame, so I went back and tried from a different angle, looking south this time. From here I could get further back and isolate the tree more, but now there were power lines and other man-made things, and I don’t like those scruffy bushes either.

Bur Oak tree, shot with an Intrepid 4×5 on HP5+ with a 90 mm Angulon lens and a red filter. 1/10 sec at f/22⅓, and developed in D-23 stock 7.5 min, 20 Celcius. I don’t like this print and I didn’t spend too much time on it. I made it worse, and that sky doesn’t help.

I think I had just made things worse. I was having trouble with the 90 mm lens too, because you have to get the standards absolutely parallel to be able to focus it to infinity, at least on my Intrepid. I had ruined a few shots already and might have given up on the lens were it not for the occasional absolutely sharp image (and I mean sharp as balls as you’ll see later). I soon learned that a recessed lens board would solve my problems – and it did.

In the meantime I hadn’t forgotten about the tree, which I knew was going to yield something eventually. I just needed the right light and the right conditions, and not all that clutter. Either winter or early spring would probably be best – it would tame some of that long grass too. Winter was coming anyway and in my mind’s eye I decided maybe I needed clearing fog and preferably rime frost. The fog would help isolate the oak from the distant trees and the frost would coat the thin twigs and make them stand out more. I would just have to wait for the right conditions. I made a few botched attempts – I would arrive too late, or the fog was too thin, but on this day (January 9th 2021), it all worked out. I was in position with my Intrepid 4×5, 150 mm lens (no filter), just as the fog was clearing. There was even some rime frost, but I had to be quick, because it usually doesn’t last too long in the sun, which was starting to emerge as the fog lifted. I exposed a sheet of Ilford HP5+ for 1/60 sec at f/45 having metered for incident light with a Sekonic. I was new at large format and wanted to be absolutely sure that the entire scene was in focus – hence the f/45 – and I used some rear tilt to help with that. What you don’t see are the branches sticking into my back as there was not another inch of space. I developed this in D-76 (1:1), 13 min. and printed it on Ilford MGFB paper, 8×10. I plan to make a bigger one soon.

Lone Bur Oak tree in winter. Intrepid 4×5, 150 mm Apo Sironar N lens on HP5plus. “The more you practice the luckier you get”. Gary Player said this about golf – I don’t play golf at all, but I suspect it holds true for just about everything else.

I also tried the 90 mm lens, but couldn’t nail the focus, so I switched to the 150. It was cold, time was against me and I wanted to be completely sure of getting the shot. Although I’m really happy with this print of course I went back. I made another attempt a few days ago this fall. The leaves on this tree just turn brown in the fall, so no problem for black and white. This time I use my 90 mm Angulon in its recessed board. I had loads of time so I made sure to nail the focus. It’s such a sharp lens when all the stars align! I don’t think this print turned out as well as the Winter scene, but as soon as I saw the print, I knew what to do next spring: infrared.

The tree this fall. Intrepid 4×5, 90 mm Schneider Angulon lens on Fomapan400. 1/50 sec at f/22 with an orange filter. The Angulon is a really nice sharp lens, and so light. No problems getting the whole tree in either. Printed on Ilford MGFB paper, 8×10 using E72.

You can find me on Instagram here

Share this post:

Find more similar content on 35mmc

Use the tags below to search for more posts on related topics:

Contribute to 35mmc for an ad-free experience.

There are two ways to contribute to 35mmc and experience it without the adverts:

Paid Subscription – £2.99 per month and you’ll never see an advert again! (Free 3-day trial).

Subscribe here.

Content contributor – become a part of the world’s biggest film and alternative photography community blog. All our Contributors have an ad-free experience for life.

Sign up here.

About The Author

By CHRISTOF RAMPITSCH
Analogue film shooter and printer since the mid 1980s. Also a home-brewer.
View Profile

Comments

Peter Kay on Get out and Photograph a Tree!

Comment posted: 07/12/2024

excellent piece. I thoroughly enjoyed it. we have a nature reserve near home and Willow my springer takes me there every day. there are a number of hawthorns along the edge of an ancient path. I love to take pictures of the gnarly trunks as they catch the morning light. shooting trees is also a great way to work through photographers block. those prints look beautiful, and you are right, infrared is such a good call.
Pete kay
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Geoff Chaplin on Get out and Photograph a Tree!

Comment posted: 07/12/2024

Great images and prints! You explained the difficulties of 4x5 well, and the inconvenient nature of fog - camera set-up time and fog dissipation contrive to make your previewed image impossible, until next time. A special image always seems to require several retakes over time. I found my recessed board and large 90mm lens a virtually impossible combination to work with, so we'll done! Do you develop in trays?
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Geoff Chaplin replied:

Comment posted: 07/12/2024

Well not we'll. Sorry about the autofuckup feature of my phone.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

CHRISTOF RAMPITSCH replied:

Comment posted: 07/12/2024

I develop the negatives in a Jobo tank. I just have the tank though, not the whole Jobo apparatus, so I have to walk back and forth while rolling it on a counter. This is why I favour shorter devloping times! The recessed board definitely works well with the Angulon, although I had to change the position of the cable release extension piece on the lons board as it interfered with the cocking lever of the shutter. An easy job.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Alexander K on Get out and Photograph a Tree!

Comment posted: 07/12/2024

Really appreciate the "shoot locally" attitude (reminds me much of Saul Leitner). I'd go as far as to say that makes photography even easier in a way—easier to spot minute details and changes when you're accustomed to the environment. Loved your pictures too, especially the last one, it has much more "rhyming" tones than previous ones.

However, it seemed to me strange that the exposure of the last image is so short. Did you use EI 400 with Fomapan 400? This film's real speed is certainly lower than 400 in 135 (I'd say by 1 step), but probably it works differently for large format.

And a completely newbie question: what is the reason to use ISO 400 film with LF cameras? I believe you have to use a tripod with such cameras anyway. Is it the look (grain and tonal response) of the specific emulsions?
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

CHRISTOF RAMPITSCH replied:

Comment posted: 07/12/2024

Thanks for the nice compliments! I would say that the enemy of LF is wind. That's why LF users prefer to use 400 speed film - and grain doesn't matter really: I rarely print larger that 11x14 and at 8x10 it's just not there. I usually try to use f/22 or smaller for DoF, so using Sunny-16 as a guide that puts me at 1/200 at f/16, or 1/100 at f/22. So going by sunny-16, with the orange filter taking one stop of light, 1/50 at f/22 is about right. I do have a spot meter but I rarely use it because every time I do use it I end up very close to Sunny16, and I do take careful notes, but definitely mistakes are made - no question about that. Shooting under cloudy skies makes that extra stop or two in film speed even more important. My default is to shoot Fomapan 400 at 200ASA and then just develop it normally according to the Massive Development Chart recommended times as though it was exposed at 400. Sometimes I give a bit of extra developing time if I think the negative will need it, but I'm quite unscientific about it, which is probably a pity. I often leave a scene wondering if I got it right.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ibraar Hussain on Get out and Photograph a Tree!

Comment posted: 07/12/2024

Delightful read and beautiful photograos
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

CHRISTOF RAMPITSCH replied:

Comment posted: 07/12/2024

Thanks! I'm glad you enjoyed it.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ken Tuomi on Get out and Photograph a Tree!

Comment posted: 07/12/2024

YES to IR film! The tree structure, the grasses and a sky full of streaming clouds; that would be epic.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

CHRISTOF RAMPITSCH replied:

Comment posted: 07/12/2024

It will be, I think - especially in spring. I'll do a follow-up "one shot" story...

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Jeffery Luhn on Get out and Photograph a Tree!

Comment posted: 07/12/2024

Christof,
I really enjoyed your persistence! I think most of us would have taken a few shots and moved on to other subjects. The fact that each one of your visits resulted in a different and improved photo is great.
I have an Intrepid and I find it to be unstable, so I must overtighten every knob. I recently bought a WillTravel 3-D printed 4x5 for my 65mm Super Angulon and it solved my problems. No movements, but my portraits and landscapes don't require that. It's very easy to use hand held!!
Jeffery
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

CHRISTOF RAMPITSCH replied:

Comment posted: 07/12/2024

I agree about the general rickety-ness of the Intrepid, but it does hit a lot of other marks - price and weight for sure. I am soo close to printing a will-travel though! I'm really just waiting for a good lens to come up (I'm thinking the 65mm super-angulon as well).

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Jim Palmer on Get out and Photograph a Tree!

Comment posted: 07/12/2024

A very nice article, thanks. I also like shooting trees. Unfortunately, a lot of the really good (photogenic) ones are impossible to separate from their background and do require a lot of visits in the right conditions. But that also makes it fun!
I like the winter shot best, good tonal separation.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

CHRISTOF RAMPITSCH replied:

Comment posted: 07/12/2024

Yes - so many photogenic trees are just surrounded by 'stuff' - other trees, parked cars, you name it! It is frustrating for sure. I also like the winter shot best, by far. Maybe because it was so hard to get?

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Roger on Get out and Photograph a Tree!

Comment posted: 07/12/2024

I echo what others have said about your persistence. A real lesson for us all. The tree in winter strikes me as outstanding.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

CHRISTOF RAMPITSCH replied:

Comment posted: 07/12/2024

I'm just glad it's so close to home, literally about 5 km from where I am typing right now. But I definitely made a lot of trips to get this shot. I remember the successful one was during a work day and I thought 'screw it, everything is perfect right now' so I dropped everything and went. I'm glad I did because I wonder whether that same look has appeared since? Maybe.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Cem Eren on Get out and Photograph a Tree!

Comment posted: 08/12/2024

Very nice work. My favorite is the snowy one.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

CHRISTOF RAMPITSCH replied:

Comment posted: 08/12/2024

Mine too, for sure. Thanks!

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Alexander Seidler on Get out and Photograph a Tree!

Comment posted: 09/12/2024

Your article is inspiring and your prints are beautiful !
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

auntimaryscanary on Get out and Photograph a Tree!

Comment posted: 09/12/2024

The persistence paid off Tony, well done.

Are they wet or digital prints? They look good however they were produced.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

auntimaryscanary on Get out and Photograph a Tree!

Comment posted: 09/12/2024

Sorry Christof, If I'd have looked at the 1st two shots in your article I would have see they are wet prints!! What enlarger do you have?
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

CHRISTOF RAMPITSCH replied:

Comment posted: 09/12/2024

I have a Saunders LPL "Super Dichroic 4500ii". It has a diffuser head. I've been using the same model since 1991.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

auntimaryscanary replied:

Comment posted: 09/12/2024

The LPL sounds great. owning it for over 30 years sure means you've had your money's worth from it! I keep looking at 4x5 enlargers but I haven't really got space in my 4ft x 4ft 3 (1.2m x 1.3m approx) darkroom.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *