Minolta 16MG & Adox CMS 20 II – Zones 5 through 9

By Tony Warren

In terms of the Zone System, as devised by Ansel Adams and Fred Archer as a teaching aid, these are the mid to lightest tones in the ten steps of the system. They also seem to be the range of tones available using Adox CMS 20 II when developed for high contrast.

I had one last strip of this film in 16mm for my Minolta 16MG which I have also used in 35mm processed for a more normal tone range but I wondered how it would fare on architectural subjects when such a limited range of tones would be recorded.

Exposure and development

I had problems with exposure when the normally accurate programmed shutter/aperture setting in the MG gave wildly erratic exposures. Whether this was because of the very bright conditions and/or the low film speed set, I don’t know. Usually it is very consistent and accurate.

For processing in Rodinal, the Massive Development Chart suggests a time of 14-16 mins at 1:100 dilution and 20ºC, rating the film at ISO 20. This gives a limited tone range, with accurate exposure, of no more than five stops, hence the title. The feature image demonstrates this. The decorative panels between the columns contain areas of Zone 5 where detail is visible. Below this tone there is hardly any detail. You might just be able to make out above the arched windows that this is the fire station in central Dunedin.

Of the 20 frames available less than ten were worth working on.

Results

With the subjects I had chosen to tackle, this mostly enhanced the images when they fitted the subject and exposure. Many though showed hardly any detail at all. These are the best of them.

One of Dunedin's restored commercial building seen through the entrance arch to the Chinese Gardens,
One of Dunedin’s restored commercial building seen through the entrance arch to the Chinese Gardens,
Detail of the Dunedin Bus terminal building now part of the Earl Settlers Museum.
Detail of the Dunedin Bus terminal building now part of the Earl Settlers Museum.
Another detail of the Bus terminal.
Another detail of the Bus terminal.
Detail of the original entrance to the Earl Settlers Museum.
Detail of the original entrance to the Earl Settlers Museum.
One of the restored commercial buildings in Art Deco style.
One of the restored commercial buildings in Art Deco style.
Detail of the restored Art Deco commercial building.
Detail of the restored Art Deco commercial building.
Detail of Dunedin's covered stadium.
Detail of Dunedin’s covered stadium.

Comments

This film is almost grain free and will render skies quite well despite not using a filter. And the tonal areas it renders well are satisfyingly juicy. Add to this the excellent lens performance despite being fixed focus. Only one frame was noticeably soft, the main subject being at a longer distance than the optimum 4m.

At the end of the day, these subjects do not suit such a simple camera but it was an interesting test all the same with some decent results despite the limitations.

Share this post:

Find more similar content on 35mmc

Use the tags below to search for more posts on related topics:

Contribute to 35mmc for an ad-free experience.

There are two ways to contribute to 35mmc and experience it without the adverts:

Paid Subscription – £2.99 per month and you’ll never see an advert again! (Free 3-day trial).

Subscribe here.

Content contributor – become a part of the world’s biggest film and alternative photography community blog. All our Contributors have an ad-free experience for life.

Sign up here.

About The Author

By Tony Warren
In my 60 or so years of serious involvement in photography I have seen the demise of the viewfinder, the rise of the SLR and the eclipse of them all with the meteoric development of the digital camera. Through it all, however, and above all else, the image is what it is all about so I now use film alongside digital. Whatever is the most appropriate or practical. My contributions will hopefully be useful for anyone interested in using film and also how a died-in-the-wool antique like me is continuing his life-long addiction in the digital age, using both platforms. The major benefit of an extended retirement is that I can spend most of my time nowadays with photography and writing about it.
View Profile

Comments

Ibraar Hussain on Minolta 16MG & Adox CMS 20 II – Zones 5 through 9

Comment posted: 07/12/2024

You’re the Tone King my friend.
Lush.
I’d try this with Bellini Duo Step
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Tony Warren replied:

Comment posted: 07/12/2024

Thank you Ibraar - I must look that up.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ibraar Hussain replied:

Comment posted: 07/12/2024

Diafine in new form I wrote about it

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Tony Warren replied:

Comment posted: 07/12/2024

Diafine I recognize but I couldn't find your article.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Stewart Waller on Minolta 16MG & Adox CMS 20 II – Zones 5 through 9

Comment posted: 07/12/2024

Lovely exposures. I have the golden MX with a working flash and am now inspired to try it out!
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Tony Warren replied:

Comment posted: 07/12/2024

Thanks Stewart. Not familiar with that model but well worth giving it a try.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Stewart Waller replied:

Comment posted: 07/12/2024

My mistake, I meant golden MG!

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Tony Warren replied:

Comment posted: 07/12/2024

Right. Thanks.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Alexander Seidler on Minolta 16MG & Adox CMS 20 II – Zones 5 through 9

Comment posted: 09/12/2024

Tone Kong - thats right !
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Alexander Seidler replied:

Comment posted: 09/12/2024

King (sorry)

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Tony Warren replied:

Comment posted: 09/12/2024

King by association? It all comes back to Ansel Adams - his book "The Negative" is a wonderful resource, even after almost a century.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Tony Warren replied:

Comment posted: 09/12/2024

Elvis, giant gorilla - I'll go with any of them Alexander.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

auntimaryscanary on Minolta 16MG & Adox CMS 20 II – Zones 5 through 9

Comment posted: 09/12/2024

Well done Tony. I always enjoy your 16mm/110 posts.

I never used anything less than 100 ISO in any of my Minolta 16's. I've got a 50 ISO Ilford I suppose I should slice to try in the 16's and Minox's now I have one of Camerahacks cutters that results in both 16 and 9.2mm strips. The cutter makes it as economical as it gets using 35mm for sub-mini film without having any 35mm perfs.

Somehow I never quite get round to building one of your 120 film slitters... one day maybe!
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Tony Warren replied:

Comment posted: 09/12/2024

Thanks for that. I don't think you need a 120 slitter. The one you have is ideal with two formats that you use. What, 6 films from one? Really appeals to a Yorkshireman. One thing I am coming to realise is that many modern films have have considerable latitude and will respond well to altered development times. Pan F is a good film though and I guess would give really fine grain.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

auntimaryscanary replied:

Comment posted: 09/12/2024

No Tony I don't "need" a 120 slitter but I do want one :) . It would be a nice little project for the dark and wet winter UK evenings. It's not very often I show my 16mm and Minox shots to other photographers but when I do they are often surprised at the quality/resolution. I think that's mainly down to the modern emulsions compared to what they've seen from such camera's in the 70's & 80's. Even I've been impressed with the quality of 7 x 5 wet prints from a 8x11mm Minox neg.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Tony Warren replied:

Comment posted: 09/12/2024

Ah yes, I understand the need thing. It is amazing how necessary something is until it isn't there. I agree about the impact emulsions have had on results from sub-min formats, and others for that matter. I really like Rollei's films with my TLR for example - there was nothing like them 50 or 60 years ago.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *