Pentax K-3 Mark 3 Monochrome Vs… – In Search of a Monochrome Option

By Floyd

For those of us who learned photography shooting Kodak’s Tri-X or Plus-X – bless that emulsion’s sainted memory – hope springs eternal that there’s a skirmish still to fight in how we shoot black and white photography. At least that was my hope when I first heard of the 25 megapixel Pentax K-3 Mark 3 Monochrome body.

It’s a move one would expect of Pentax – a go it alone camera company that would be the first to offer a monochrome sensor in a somewhat affordable APSC body (US$2,200 compared to Leica’s options in the US$6,000 to US$9,000 range). I’m a documentary photographer who usually buys used to stretch the budget. And I still mix it up with film when I can justify the time and expense, and a client agrees.

So, when I began planning a photo workshop with friend and former Time Magazine photo superstar PF Bentley on his home island of Molokai in Hawaii, I thought it would be a good opportunity to do a head-to-head comparison between the Pentax Monochrome and a black and white 35mm film kit. For me, that means the Nikon F100 with the Nikkor 50mm F1.4 D lens. Film was Ilford HP5+.

Our model, Hina, captured by the Pentax Monochrome.
Hina, who dances hula, photographed with the Nikon F100 loaded with FujiFilm Pro160 color film, which was converted to monochrome with DXO’s Silver Efex.

I’ll cut to the chase: the Pentax kit (I rented the body and a 35mm autofocus lens from Lensrentals) was sweet indeed – small but solid, weatherproof, a shooter’s camera. But it turned out there was no boost to my workflow, I was running the PEF RAW files through Photoshop anyway. I find that even working with scans of black and white film I use DXO’s Silver Efex monochrome software.

The Pentax sensor did exceedingly well handling the shadows on the rocky outcrops.
I had to work the film scans a bit more than the digital files for this series of photos.

I found the Pentax out of camera JPEGS to be flat – there aren’t Fujifilm-like monochrome options to possibly avoid post processing altogether. I like contrast and a bit of bite in my monochrome images. After four days of shooting with the Pentax, I found I liked the flexibility of the RAW files but decided that if I was going to go through the effort of post-processing, I’d stick with what I do now.

That said, I thought it might be of interest to share a few (post processed) images from the Pentax and Nikon kits. And I decided to throw in three ringers – one image shot with a Rolleiflex 2.8F, one with the Nikon but shot on FujiFilm Pro 160 C-41 color film and then processed to black and white, and one made with my usual digital kit – an Olympus micro four thirds body and lens. Now the Olympus photo is an out of camera JPEG shot with the grainy black and white ART filter.

HP5+ did a good job capturing the sunrise light but you’ve got to love grain.
The Pentax handled sunset light captured in a cloud over Oahu.

The workshop PF and I run is really a mentorship with two talented enthusiast photographers who, like me, live on the island of Oahu. Every few months, we all gather on Molokai for a few days of working together. On this trip, we spent most of our time shooting on the island’s gorgeous west side beaches, and one afternoon working with an equally gorgeous local model.

A rock outcrop photographed by the Rolleiflex 2.8F on a tripod.

I was happy with all the results – but not so happy with the Pentax to justify investing in yet another lens mount system. For the time being, I’ll stick with what I have and know.

An out of camera jpg from an Olympus OMD EM5 set to the ART filter grainy black and white.

Share this post:

Find more similar content on 35mmc

Use the tags below to search for more posts on related topics:

Contribute to 35mmc for an ad-free experience.

There are two ways to contribute to 35mmc and experience it without the adverts:

Paid Subscription – £2.99 per month and you’ll never see an advert again! (Free 3-day trial).

Subscribe here.

Content contributor – become a part of the world’s biggest film and alternative photography community blog. All our Contributors have an ad-free experience for life.

Sign up here.

About The Author

By Floyd
Floyd K. Takeuchi is a documentary and fine arts photographer who is based in Honolulu, Hawaii. Most of his work is done in Hawaii, the Pacific Islands and Japan.
View Profile

Comments

Alex Kreisman on Pentax K-3 Mark 3 Monochrome Vs… – In Search of a Monochrome Option

Comment posted: 09/06/2024

The workshop look’s terrific and you have managed to capture beautiful images.
I do not want to sound “leica geek” but if you truly want a fantastic experience with a monochrome sensor just buy the first version of the m9 monochrome. Mine is now more than 10 years but works as it did the first day and the rendering is just beautiful. In the question of working the image it’s a breeze.
Again my 2 cents
Have fun
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Brett on Pentax K-3 Mark 3 Monochrome Vs… – In Search of a Monochrome Option

Comment posted: 09/06/2024

For those dedicated to B&W, what the Pentax Monochrome (and the Leica Monochromes) offer is a dynamic tonal range and low noise/grain vastly better than is achievable with any B&W film or colour sensor image converted to B&W.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Reed George on Pentax K-3 Mark 3 Monochrome Vs… – In Search of a Monochrome Option

Comment posted: 09/06/2024

Hi Floyd. Very interesting topic! I did a series on my blog that I called “Dreaming in Monochrom)e” during the time before I sprung for a Leica M10 Monochrom. During that time, I shot B&W film in my M4-2.

I find your results intriguing. In my opinion, the image with the most luscious tones is the one converted from color film to B&W!

I do really enjoy my M10M, but must admit that it’s an indulgence.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Reed George replied:

Comment posted: 09/06/2024

Oh, and the Pentax did a wonderful job on that cloud, imo.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Gary Smith on Pentax K-3 Mark 3 Monochrome Vs… – In Search of a Monochrome Option

Comment posted: 09/06/2024

I find that my film scans still go through a post-processing session once I get them back. I love the first sentence of your article, Since I re-started shooting film, I was disappointed with HP5+ and have switched back to Tri-X but maybe I should try a roll or 2 of TMAX?
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Andrew L on Pentax K-3 Mark 3 Monochrome Vs… – In Search of a Monochrome Option

Comment posted: 09/06/2024

My extended test of the K-3 III Monochrome came to a somewhat different conclusion: the post processing (or lack of it) was one of the best parts of the experience. I shot RAW and edited in Lightroom, but extremely minimally: just the tone curve for the most part, and very occasionally the contrast slider. That's it, and I could export JPEGs in about 30 seconds. It's similar to what I do with B&W film scans (though I do some preliminary exposure tweaks during the scan process).

I'm trying to get away from using Silver Efex, honestly, because it's just so time consuming and there are so many options. For me, the Monochrome offered a great look that was consistent and took absolutely minimal effort in post. I just wish it wasn't so expensive...
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Tony Warren on Pentax K-3 Mark 3 Monochrome Vs… – In Search of a Monochrome Option

Comment posted: 09/06/2024

An interesting and informative article Floyd, thank you. The sunset and rock detail shots are particularly effective. The detail in the latter is impressive. I presume that the Pentax digital will produce an increasingly grainier result as ISO increases which would add to its versatility. The Olympus example's grain seems somehow too manufactured and regular but a strong image nonetheless. Thanks again for the post.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Peter Kay on Pentax K-3 Mark 3 Monochrome Vs… – In Search of a Monochrome Option

Comment posted: 09/06/2024

An excellent article with some stunning images. I am a film and digital user, with my digital brand being Pentax. While the K3iii Mono may not have film simulations, it is probably possible to customise the jpeg outputs. You certainly can on the colour versions of Pentax DSLRs. My KP for example has a version of Classic Chrome and my preferred mono settings amongst the colour profiles. I understand that you can't go adjusting a rental camera too much, but a quick trawl through Pentax forums will show you just how customisable the K3iii monochrome really is.......and it has IBIS that works with any lens you want to put on it, including M42s....and it is weather resistant......and it has one of the best pentaprisms ever fitted to an SLR...... I really want one, can you tell?
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ian Do Carmo on Pentax K-3 Mark 3 Monochrome Vs… – In Search of a Monochrome Option

Comment posted: 10/06/2024

Floyd, what a great insight on the little Pentax which hardly gets it any attention, when I younger I always wanted to have one, but as years gone by the company almost succumbed in the digital landscape. It’s comforting to see that they are still out there though.
Beautiful photos, the Pentax sensor reminded a bit like those APX films, like orthochromatic, but this a subjective opinion.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Kodachromeguy on Pentax K-3 Mark 3 Monochrome Vs… – In Search of a Monochrome Option

Comment posted: 10/06/2024

How interesting. To me, the Rolleiflex photo immediately jumped out as special. It's hard to beat more film surface area.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Floyd on Pentax K-3 Mark 3 Monochrome Vs… – In Search of a Monochrome Option

Comment posted: 11/06/2024

Thanks to everyone who took the time to respond. Stating the obvious -- someone with more skills than me with digital editing would very likely end up with a different outcome (ie would now own the Pentax). I did want to make a note on Tony Warren's comment on the photo made with an Olympus in-camera "art filter": it does indeed look like the results we would get from Tri-X pushed two or three stops. I had a 16x20 print made of that file by the pros at Hidden Light Lab with Piezography inks and very much like the results. In fact, that print is now one of the ones I've got for sale in a gallery. Of course, as with all things photographic, your mileage may vary.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Jay Dann Walker on Pentax K-3 Mark 3 Monochrome Vs… – In Search of a Monochrome Option

Comment posted: 14/06/2024

Black-and-white in gorgeous Hawaii? Oh, my...

To me that would be drinking beer when champagne is available...

Then I read the article again and realized, hm, the author did use some color film. So I stand corrected, sort of.

Agree about the photographs, tho'. Stunning. All.

Sadly, here in AUS the Pentax Monochrome is horribly unaffordable, not as bankrupting as the Leica but enough to make any photographer on a realistic budget think twice about buying either, and especially the Weztlar Wonder.

Alas, same applies to any analog camera here now. Buying a five-pack of 35 or 120 is no longer a purchase but rather an investment. Processing costs are through the roof. Prints, forget it! My Rolleiflexes are gathering dust in my camera cabinet. I may sell them soon, before the film camera market in Oz hits the bottom. Sad but that's life in Century 21.

So yes, me, an age pensioner that on a real-world budget, I'll go on using my Nikon D800 set to Monochrome, which gives me the images I like without having to spend too many of my declining years in front of my computer to jazz up my images. My time is short now and there are so many nice images waiting to be preserved for what remains of posterity - on my digitals of course.

I will be in Bali in a few days and looking forward to my first morning walk along Sanur Beach - maybe with my Nikon set on B&W.

In the summing up, an excellent article. Many thanks and kudos to the author.

Best, DANN
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *