In a previous post, I didn’t mention that my very first personal camera is the Kodak Instamatic 155x that Dad brought me during a summer camp in 1972. After six years of school and/or summer pics I made my debut in the Canon FD world, but sometimes insisted with 126’s, when they were still available – so naïve with their nice square frame. Wisely, I tried to save a couple of shells for possible refill, but actually I never decided to use them, and the 155x is still waiting on a shelf.
Last April, at the end of a short GAS relapse, I saw an almost perfect Instamatic 500, with clean collapsible Schneider Xenar 38/2.8 in Compur mount, reliable coupled Se meter, and even a fine chrome-reinforced case. I couldn’t resist and had to invest 15€ in a massive, almost unusable, 1965-born jewel.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75a8b/75a8b1f2f014a0bc7847c5551921a4ae8da8c7b4" alt=""
So I spent other bit of money for a sealed 126, an Ilfocolor HR 100 expired in 1987 and possibly badly stored. Instead of simply opening the shell under a comfortable light, throwing away the film, I decided to use it @ 25 ISO, on the day we were touched by the Giro d’Italia.
I then developed it in C41 (risking my fingers in the dark, with a trusty cutter blade). It came out greenish black with some barely perceptible coloured shapes. Busy and disappointed, I left both the film and the exoskeleton alone.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/aee94/aee947e548487c2b8bf9a447a56ecec3322c1873" alt=""
Now on holiday, I’m betting on the refill experience. I loaded a strip of FP4+ to use it @ 200. The 500 has some erratic advancement problems (have a couple of ideas to fix them), but shows very good results, even with jammed frames. This crispy lens deserves a fresh vivid colour film.
Semi-sprocketed frames really don’t annoy me, and I hope that both the Square Sisters will soon be back in town.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4e3bf/4e3bf8c7eb46b1b9062419b246346d82e632f5e3" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/02eef/02eef449b2c393d6cae60ea20b6e71ba9be6b296" alt=""
And the old negative? I asked for a miracle, presenting the strips to The Silverfast Soul Of The Mighty V700, and a miracle happened. Blistered, foggy and faded, but – yes! – readable.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/600e9/600e93359e20bd6c60c66b9fdf545449e7edcc09" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/81af3/81af3e00c8a927505e10e63f6c00d558c949a388" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5467e/5467ec148cef46e17eb631f50d2eb18e0175bb65" alt=""
Find me on twitter here
Share this post:
Comments
Terry B on 5 frames with Kodak Instamatic 500 – By Sergio Palazzi
Comment posted: 11/09/2019
I'm guessing that you may be Italian. Have you come across this product by a compatriot of yours. You may find it interesting.
https://www.camerhack.it/product-category/adapters/
The b/w images show what the lens is capable of and if you wish to explore more its capabilities then the Fakmatic might be a boon.
The colour images are a little bizarre but very interesting.
Comment posted: 11/09/2019
Kodachromeguy on 5 frames with Kodak Instamatic 500 – By Sergio Palazzi
Comment posted: 11/09/2019
Comment posted: 11/09/2019
Comment posted: 11/09/2019
Comment posted: 11/09/2019
Robert on 5 frames with Kodak Instamatic 500 – By Sergio Palazzi
Comment posted: 12/09/2019
Comment posted: 12/09/2019
Bernhard on 5 frames with Kodak Instamatic 500 – By Sergio Palazzi
Comment posted: 12/09/2019
thank you for sharing your experience.
Regards Bernhard
Comment posted: 12/09/2019