5 Frames with Lomography Orca 110 monochrome film.

By Tony Warren

The first film I tried when I became fascinated by the subminiature formats was Lomography’s Orca 110 monochrome offering because I had bought a Minolta 460 Tx 110 camera very reasonably to get more familiar with 16mm film without massive outlay. Its electrical parts were kaput unfortunately and I bought a second one, also at a reasonable price, that possessed all its functions, the one I used here.

Orca is a 100 ISO emulsion giving 24 13 x 17 mm exposures on 16mm film in the drop-in cartridge system introduced by Kodak in 1972. The cartridge has a moulding on one end that tells the camera roughly what its film speed is if there is any sort of control provided. Initially only ISO 80 and 200 were covered, ISO 400 being added later. These matched the available Kodak films at the time.

Lomography are to be applauded for supporting the revival of the very successful 110 format with several compatible emulsions.

The camera and process

The camera I used was the second Minolta I bought. Its battery, a single AA cell, powers the flash and a cds sensor that simply lights a warning in the finder if there is not enough light and flash is needed. Otherwise, a standard sort of weather symbol system is provided for exposure control. Shutter speed is fixed at 1/200 sec and two scale focussing Rokkor lenses are provided, a 4-element 25 mm standard and a 3-element 43 mm short tele. This was near the top end of Minolta’s range and has a definite impact on the quality of results. It should be born in mind that not many run-of-the-mill 110s were of this quality or offered the same degree of control but a few models were very capable instruments.

I developed the film in Rodinal which, although not exactly a fine grain developer, gives good results with most films when based on the recommendations of the Massive Development Chart. Grain here is only really noticeable in plain, light toned areas and is crisply defined which always helps with apparent sharpness. Checking with the Massive Development Chart, I couldn’t find any times for dedicated fine grain developers like Perceptol but I would imagine ID11/D76 and some HC110 dilutions could give finer grain.

Results

This film format isn’t really suited to the grand view and gives best results for closer subjects with plenty contrast and detail.

The moderate film speed helps with grain of course and also with acuity and contrast. The results are indeed sharp from the Rokkor lenses and with as much contrast as you might like to introduce in post. Straight from my copy camera, negatives have a good tone range. Scans may be more variable but I no longer use a scanner so cannot comment other than to say my now defunct Epson 2450 Perfection used to do an excellent job. These examples were all copied with a 20Mp Sony A3000 and Micro Nikkor with tubes and adapter, reversed and post processed in Affinity Photo.

Wall plaque, Port Chalmers, Dunedin.
Wall plaque, Port Chalmers, Dunedin.

The first frame shows how much detail can be recorded. Even the wall texture is rendered well and sharpness is excellent.

Just arrived at Dunedin Airport.
Just arrived at Dunedin Airport.

The second demonstrates the weaknesses in the even toned areas and detail in the aircraft is not as good as the plaque in the example above though the lighting conditions are not helping here.

Architectural detail.
Just arrived at Dunedin Airport.

Again, well defined and closer subjects respond well, the acuity and contrast suiting this type of subject well.

One time only.
One time only.

Taken with the standard lens and flash, plenty of detail is rendered resulting in almost negligible grain in the sharp areas. This is the only shot I managed of him with his eyes open. He disappeared as soon as he saw the camera after this.

Undetected.
Undetected.

Another cat study, also with flash, and using the telephoto lens on the 460 Tx. The detail and textures virtually eliminate the grain.

Conclusion

I can thoroughly recommend this film based on my experience of using it with this admittedly high end camera with the best quality glass. If you look at my other posts on the subject of 110 and sub-miniature you will know why I have moved to other emulsions which I now slit down from larger film stock. However, if you are not into tinkering or just want the convenience of a readily available, trade processable, mono film this should fit the bill.

Share this post:

Find more similar content on 35mmc

Use the tags below to search for more posts on related topics:

Contribute to 35mmc for an ad-free experience.

There are two ways to contribute to 35mmc and experience it without the adverts:

Paid Subscription – £2.99 per month and you’ll never see an advert again! (Free 3-day trial).

Subscribe here.

Content contributor – become a part of the world’s biggest film and alternative photography community blog. All our Contributors have an ad-free experience for life.

Sign up here.

About The Author

By Tony Warren
In my 60 or so years of serious involvement in photography I have seen the demise of the viewfinder, the rise of the SLR and the eclipse of them all with the meteoric development of the digital camera. Through it all, however, and above all else, the image is what it is all about so I now use film alongside digital. Whatever is the most appropriate or practical. My contributions will hopefully be useful for anyone interested in using film and also how a died-in-the-wool antique like me is continuing his life-long addiction in the digital age, using both platforms. The major benefit of an extended retirement is that I can spend most of my time nowadays with photography and writing about it.
View Profile

Comments

Bill Watts on 5 Frames with Lomography Orca 110 monochrome film.

Comment posted: 12/03/2024

I have used Orca since it's inception in the cassettes with no window and no backing paper. These gave good results and I noted the same issues with grain being noticeable in large areas of low contrast - not really going to get away from this due to the ratio of grain size to frame size, unless using low ASA duplicating film.

The second batch of Orca I got has issues with the light bleeding through where the white numbers on the film backing are, again my stock is frozen and a few years old I bought a lot in case Lomo stopped producing it! This seems to have been corrected in the latest cassettes as ther is no light bleed on the photos above.

I had sucess developing it in Ilfotec DD-X.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Tony Warren replied:

Comment posted: 12/03/2024

Thanks Bill. That's very useful information. Hadn't heard of the earlier windowless cassette before. I always tape the window over to avoid any problems.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Gary Smith on 5 Frames with Lomography Orca 110 monochrome film.

Comment posted: 12/03/2024

Nice discussion of the Orca 110 film as well as some cool example shots - thanks Tony! I've yet to branch out into film stock experimentation. At this point shooting film again is an experiment.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Tony Warren replied:

Comment posted: 12/03/2024

Thanks Gary. Computerless photography is engrossing stuff and much more satisfying.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ibraar Hussain on 5 Frames with Lomography Orca 110 monochrome film.

Comment posted: 12/03/2024

inspirational! You've encouraged me to seek out and play with 110
the 2nd to last photo of the cat is sublime - probably my favourite of those I've seen on 35mmc
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Tony Warren replied:

Comment posted: 12/03/2024

Thank you Ibraar. He is a good subject if I catch him unawares.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *