Photo of Hasselblad X1D II

Hasselblad X1D II 50C – A Week of Trying Digital Medium Format

By Sebastian Shields

After the recommendation from a friend to check out my school’s lending library, I went on a deep dive through all the gear available. After finding a Plustek 8200i as well as a variety of lenses for camera systems too new and expensive for me to own, I found a tab labeled “Specialty Camera Equipment.” Placed firmly on the page was a Hasselblad X1D II 50C. As much as I’d love to pretend I was unphased, I was actually thrilled to be able to borrow the camera. I had only ever heard immensely positive things about digital medium format, and the opportunity to shoot on a Hasselblad felt insanely special. After about a week of waiting for my borrowing period to start, I was finally able to pick it up and start shooting.

Metal Cow
35mm | f/3.5 | 1/320 | ISO 100
Duck
75mm | f/4.5 | 1/180 | ISO 200

To preface, the X1DII is a beautiful camera, full stop. Sharp, defined Scandinavian design combined with the crisp, cool feeling every time you pick up the all-metal body reminds you constantly of the sheer build of the camera. If you still manage to forget the origins of the premium piece of Industrial Design you’re holding, the camera makes sure to remind you with small sans-serif text exclaiming “Handmade In Sweden” on the top plate. This immense attention to detail and cleanliness follows into the colors of the RAW files. The large 50 megapixel files have amazing, natural colors that seem to look good no matter the conditions.

View of top plate

Still, with all this, I found a way to be critical. This isn’t to say that I think it’s a bad camera, (if my overly pretentious praise from the previous paragraph didn’t make it clear enough,) it’s just not a camera for most people, but especially myself. This should have been obvious to me at the time, I’ve always been a run and gun, faster paced, photographer. Even on film, which has only gotten more expensive, I’ll still blast through a roll, sunny-sixteening, scale focusing, f/8 and be there, etc. This camera, at least with the lens I had on it, was anything but quick. I was plagued by slow, hunting autofocus throughout most of my shooting. In my experience, this could not be solved by changing to manual focus as the electronically connected focus ring often felt imprecise at best, especially in the moment. Also, while the body is not as big as my 1D MkII, the lens, a 35-75 f3.5-4.5 made it feel massive and front heavy, which when combined with how warm the camera would get when shooting made taking the camera out feel like a considerable commitment.

The Hasselblad is noticeably front weighted with the 35-75. While it may be smaller than the 1D otherwise the lens feels disproportionately large compared to the body and it definitely messes with the balance. I think the reason I minded the bulk so much more with the Hasselblad was the lack of battery grip which balances the 1D out so much more easily.

While the last paragraph was critical of the camera as a tool I’d use personally, over the course of the week I still grew to appreciate certain aspects. The X1D II may never be the type of camera I’d use for my own enjoyment, but in the right circumstances, the 50 megapixels and technical ability of the camera were amazingly useful. The 50 megapixels, for example, are great for image manipulation and pixel-level editing in Photoshop, especially when speaking on separating complex objects from their backgrounds. The colors were also always nearly perfect straight out of camera. Other than the camera seeming to get a little confused shooting a nearly all white interior, I often barely adjusted photos.

Abstract interior photo
55mm | f/8 | 1/160 | ISO 200
Photo of pram for used for project
60mm | f/32 | 4 Seconds | ISO 100 (Removed/Altered much of the background in Photoshop, Made easier by the 50 Megapixels)
Building reflected in puddle
50mm | f/8 | 1/90 | ISO 400
Old Lincoln sedan
45mm | f/3.5 | 1/800 | ISO 800
Rainbow near building
40mm | f/8 | 1/350 | ISO 800

Overall, while I think the camera was obviously not perfect, I do look back on my time with it positively. While I obviously can’t afford to buy one and could never justify owning one anyways, I do think trying one out was a valuable experience. I set out with the goal to figure out what digital medium format was like, but left with more questions than answers. I definitely wonder what the camera would be like with a smaller prime and a better manual focus experience. This is also not to mention wondering how the experience would be with a more normal (for medium format) design, as opposed to the more modern feel of the X1D which may have led me into believing it was supposed to be a faster camera than it was. I could easily also rant about how my computer did (or didn’t) handle the files, but I’ll leave you with this: All said and done, the X1D II is an amazing camera, (on a tripod.) Happy shooting and if you can try something new, definitely do so cause it can absolutely change your perspective!

Feel free to check out my Instagram for more photography.

Share this post:

Find more similar content on 35mmc

Use the tags below to search for more posts on related topics:

Contribute to 35mmc for an ad-free experience.

There are two ways to contribute to 35mmc and experience it without the adverts:

Paid Subscription – £2.99 per month and you’ll never see an advert again! (Free 3-day trial).

Subscribe here.

Content contributor – become a part of the world’s biggest film and alternative photography community blog. All our Contributors have an ad-free experience for life.

Sign up here.

About The Author

By Sebastian Shields
Photographer out of Maine, Currently in Virginia studying Industrial Design.
View Profile

Comments

Jonathan Leavitt on Hasselblad X1D II 50C – A Week of Trying Digital Medium Format

Comment posted: 15/11/2024

I have used this camera and, like you, came to the conclusion that even for the person who has everything, this is a camera that seldom leaves the studio and belongs on a tripod. The photos are pixel perfect, and the dynamic range is terrific. But if I needed this camera, I would buy it even without the auto focus.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Arthur Gottschalk on Hasselblad X1D II 50C – A Week of Trying Digital Medium Format

Comment posted: 15/11/2024

Very interesting. But I wonder how this camera would compare to the Fuji GFX series. Thanks
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Bill Brown replied:

Comment posted: 15/11/2024

The non-starter for our studio was the fact that no Hasselblad system is supported by Capture One. When we originally went digital in 2006 with the Phase One P-30 replacing the film back on the Hasselblad we were required to use CP 1 for processing the files. We have never looked back and have been dedicated to that software ever since. Our current system is the Fuji GFX 100 II and the older GFX 100 is now devoted to scanning. Some of the best scans we've ever produced and that's compared to an Imacon scanner we used previously. Thankfully hard drives have come down in price because this system eats storage space for lunch. A single RAW capture is just above 200MB. The advantage to medium format film is that no digital storage is required until a scan is pulled and even then a large resolution scan may not be needed. Using some of the upsizing software a totally useable larger file can be obtained if needed. We are sometimes required to do multiple image compositing or extreme cropping and the Fuji files excel with their abundance of information. Moving to digital medium format requires a dedication to systematic archiving and an abundance of storage space. As a casual personal shooter medium format film is a better path for me but digital is the only realistic method at the studio.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Arthur Gottschalk replied:

Comment posted: 15/11/2024

Thanks for that. Very helpful.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Louis A. Sousa on Hasselblad X1D II 50C – A Week of Trying Digital Medium Format

Comment posted: 16/11/2024

Hi I have been shooting the Fuji GFX system and am having second thoughts on whether the investment has been warranted for my needs.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

John Sullivan on Hasselblad X1D II 50C – A Week of Trying Digital Medium Format

Comment posted: 18/11/2024

I used the Phaseone camera when I was a working photographer and found it to be cumbersome and slow to focus, but the files were excellent. We purchased a Fuji GFX 100s and it was a mainstay for the copy work we did, also art copy. When I retired I bought a Fuji for myself. I frequently take it out and collect images. The 50mm lens is compact and the camera is easy to get proper focus and the anti shake system is able to provide sharp images at low shutter speeds. It's no more difficult to use than a Nikon D850. The files are excellent.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Patrick Medd on Hasselblad X1D II 50C – A Week of Trying Digital Medium Format

Comment posted: 19/11/2024

Thank you for this. I was interested to read your article because I have been playing with one of these myself for the last six months. Secondhand, these cameras are (just) coming into the realm of 'affordibility' (i.e. a similar price to a much more modern, fully functional new 'full frame' camera) but the lenses (thanks partly to an all leaf-shutter system) remain prohibitively expensive making this a very difficult proposition to buy into as a system.

My experience tallies very closely with yours, beautiful colours (I believe each camera is individually colour calibrated at the factory) and lovely tonality from that big 50MP sensor. The autofocus is useless, but manual focussing is pretty good with the electronic viewfinder and build quality is second to none. I had the advantage of using it with the 45mm f/4P lens which has mechnical focus rather than fly-by-wire and is also very compact—the issue of balance between a modern mirrorless body (which can be made very small) and a modern, fast, high quality autofocus lens that can cover a full frame or medium format sensor (which can't), is one that I don't think is pointed out enough. All in all it is a difficult camera to recommend and a hard one to justify, but when it shines boy does it shine.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *