Is a photograph any good if it needs an introduction? Shouldn´t art speak to you without accompanying words? Shouldn’t a great picture captivate your imagination and inspire thought and free association without the author telling you what to think and associate?
I have this idea in my head that a picture should wow the viewer. Like what Cartier-Bresson made. My own “work” if I may call my hobby work at all, falls way short of that grand idea. That is why I hesitate to show my pictures to anyone. Are they any good if I need to tell people why I made them in the first place? And, more importantly, do I have anything to say that would be remotely interesting to anyone?
I´m in my early fifties now and I have come to regard myself as a pretty average person in most aspects. I don’t travel to breathtaking places where no man went before, I don’t have grand adventures, yielding exotic or exciting pictures. I am not a journalist pursuing the great stories of the day. I am just a regular person living a mostly regular life. All I can tell you about – and try to take pictures of – is what moves me.
In my regular life among all the good things there also were humps and bumps in the road. Bad stuff I didn´t see coming. That had an impact on my view of the world. I somehow acquired a feeling of being disconnected from home. When I say home, I´m not talking about a place but about an emotion. It’s a feeling of being fundamentally safe and welcome. A loving feeling, the firm knowledge that life is good despite all the trouble.
That feeling has never quite returned to me as I imagine to have known it before. There now is that persistent nagging feeling that life is somehow dangerous. I don´t feel settled in it. It´s not a dominant feeling, it´s more like a shadow in a corner of the soul that light won´t reach. As of late, I found myself looking at houses for sale a lot, hoping that having your own home might somehow bring that feeling back. I know it won´t, because feeling at home starts within me, not in a place, however nice it may be.
But this experience gave me an idea. I wanted to translate my emotions into pictures. This feeling of disconnectedness from a feeling, a feeling of melancholy and quest to regain what was lost. A feeling of almost, but not quite being at home inside myself.
So in late 2020, for the first time ever, I sat down and imagined pictures to illustrate my feelings and made a list of photos I wanted to take. A tower of the most expensive and exclusive flats in the newly developed “Hafencity” of Hamburg, my home town. A night shot of illuminated homes in Blankenese, a fancy quarter on the banks of the river Elbe. The bedstead of a homeless person under a railway bridge just a short walk from my flat. A shelter for refugees. Mind you, these are very dramatic motifs by comparison to my own situation – my life and my small worries are worlds away from the very real ordeal of a refugee or a homeless person. I merely take these pictures as a chiffre for my inner landscape of emotion, knowing full well that my emotions are a greatly distorted reflection of reality.
As a tool for this ongoing project, I use my Rolleiflex 2.8F. That needs no introduction. It is a perfect companion for this kind of premeditated picture taking. It is a tool that I love to handle and use in slow motion. Everything about it is a joy to touch and feel, so you don´t want to rush the process. It also is remarkably simple to use. I grew up in the 80ies taking 35mm pictures with automatic SLRs. Medium format always seemed daunting to me. The Rolleiflex 2,8F takes away all that sense of drama and complication. It is just the most natural thing to use. The only issue I have is that I have only had it a few weeks before I started the project. I ran a test film through it and the light meter on my copy seemed to give plausible readings, so I decided to rely on it. I have just had it CLAed and it turns out it wasn´t really – it was two stops off, leading to overexposure. Not a great issue, but the negatives are a bit dense now. Well, I never was good at waiting when I wanted to play with a toy…
The film is KODAK Portra 400. I wanted colour as I felt black and white would be overly dramatic. But I also wanted a balanced, neutral feel and Protra seemed just the right choice. Combined with grey skies, which are in plentiful supply in Hamburg, I achieved that look I was hoping for when I imagined the pictures. I had the film developed and scanned at a lab in Hamburg. They seemed to come out a bit more red than I believe they should, so I tweaked them a bit.
This is the first project of this kind I ever embarked on. So far it was so much fun that I think it will not be the last. It will be over when I regain that feeling of being at home. What I learned from it so far, is that to me photography with a sense of purpose is a lot more fun than just casually snapping pictures. Trying to express my emotionality is such a purpose. I don´t know if the results are meaningful in any way to anyone but me. And to get back to the question at the beginning of this text; I don´t know if these photos work for anyone but me without giving a context (or even with context for that matter). But I believe that doesn´t take away what they mean to me.
Share this post:
Comments
Steven Cremer on Not at home with my Rolleiflex – Stefan Wilde
Comment posted: 17/03/2021
Maybe it was just the emotional context of these images, it touched a portion of my soul. Images are meaningless with context, you have activated a part of what it is to be human. Good on you keep working as you convey this personal message, I could really relate to this "Weltschmertz". Is this what you wanted to express visually, Stefan ?
Comment posted: 17/03/2021
Comment posted: 17/03/2021
Comment posted: 17/03/2021
David Hume on Not at home with my Rolleiflex – Stefan Wilde
Comment posted: 17/03/2021
Comment posted: 17/03/2021
Barry Reid on Not at home with my Rolleiflex – Stefan Wilde
Comment posted: 17/03/2021
Really, the thought that art can stand alone should be put to bed for good. Yes, on the surface level an image can be pleasing, or not, but that is more connected with Craft and current tastes. Historically Art typically has, cultural, power, philosophical or religious aspects, more recently personal politics have become prominent. Looking back in time through any great art gallery as viewer you will find that unless conversant with the symbolism of the times in which work was made it's very hard to fully 'get' what they mean - even with work from the mid 20th Century, for younger viewers.
Therein lies an essential difference between 'Art' which carries meanings which definitely require other reference points to be brought to bear and 'Craft' which can be enjoyed on it's own terms. It's important to note that Craft and Art, related but neither is a pre-requisite of the other. There are also the seeds of an argument that craft is timeless there, however I'd also rebut that with photographic example - the both Pictorialists and the f/64 crowd placed great emphasis of craft one side looking for just the right degree of softness, the other side for sharpness. Very few would like both approaches equally, on a basic level.
One area where photography differs from most painting, is that photography has a deep culture of working in series, projects, 'zines. Not every shot needs to be 'stunning' in that context pacing and flow are also part of the edit. A literary book consisting entirely of barnstorming one liners would be a pretty tiring read... so feel free to include shots that aren't quite at the top level of craft as long as they move the narrative on.
Comment posted: 17/03/2021
Tom Heneghan on Not at home with my Rolleiflex – Stefan Wilde
Comment posted: 17/03/2021
Comment posted: 17/03/2021
Clive Shepherd on Not at home with my Rolleiflex – Stefan Wilde
Comment posted: 17/03/2021
Comment posted: 17/03/2021
Peter Roberts on Not at home with my Rolleiflex – Stefan Wilde
Comment posted: 17/03/2021
Judging by the comments so far you've certainly touched a chord with your wonderful words and photographs. I know they did with me.
Consciously or not you seem to be using photography as a catharsis. Everyone needs something to express and face their inner feelings and I am glad you have found it. Keep at it, my friend. You are not alone.
Do you need the words? Yes, they are part of the whole. After all, isn't Gesamtkunstwerk a German art form?
Comment posted: 17/03/2021
James Evidon on Not at home with my Rolleiflex – Stefan Wilde
Comment posted: 17/03/2021
Stefan, you put the images to the words. Indeed; Weltschmerz.
Comment posted: 17/03/2021
Abdul on Not at home with my Rolleiflex – Stefan Wilde
Comment posted: 18/03/2021
Comment posted: 18/03/2021
Keith W on Not at home with my Rolleiflex – Stefan Wilde
Comment posted: 18/03/2021
It makes me think that perhaps a key question is not "Where is our home?", but rather "Where do we feel most at home?"
The original intent behind your photographs shines through. To me, they clearly examine the question above and would make a fine photobook.
For similar work, have a look at the Scottish photographers Al Brydon or Iain Sarjeant or indeed any of the publication of Another Place Press (who I have no connection with by the way!)
Thank you for posting.
Stefan Wilde on Not at home with my Rolleiflex – Stefan Wilde
Comment posted: 18/03/2021
Lewis S on Not at home with my Rolleiflex – Stefan Wilde
Comment posted: 10/03/2023
Again fantastic work and very touching piece - all the best on your journey of self discovery (from a fellow traveler)
Lewie
Comment posted: 10/03/2023