7Artisans 50mm f1.1 – The Everyman’s Noctilux? – Guest Review by Mehrdad Abedi

By Mehrdad Abedi

This post was originally posted in German on Qimago.de – that post can be found here – 7Artisans / DJ Optical 50mm F/1.1 – Das Lichtwunder für Leica M

When I first looked at the 7Artisans 5mm f/1.1 specs I asked myself if this could be a kind of ‘everyman’s Noctilux’. But hand in hand with this question comes the scepticism. Is it really possible? I think the “Made in China“ mark is enough for many people to sneer at a product like this.

But, seriously, why?? In the Seventies many things coming from Japan were regarded as “lower quality” (speaking of photo industry, that is). Quality came from somewhere else, at least in the minds of many people.

And today? Fujfilm, Sony, Canon and Nikon… the major brands in photography business are all from Japan. In APS-C and full frame at least, these brands have the major market shares. In medium format there are other big players around, sure. But here Fujifilm made a huge leap forward with their GFX50s (and don’t forget Pentax! ???? )

Of course, there was a steep learning curve for the Japanese brands. My father bought a Canon F-1 back in the day and the camera still works fine. (And every now and then you could even use it as a hammer…) In the last years I had a lot of good experiences with “Made in China” so maybe there is a change there similar to the Japanese brands?

When I was looking for ways to get my hands on a 7Artisans 50mm lens I found Hamish Gill and his 35mmc blog. This was a little funny for me, because some years back I was a regular reader of his blog due to his work with film and (mostly?) Leica.

In the UK and Europe he is selling the 50m f/1.1 (and soon the 35mm as well) for Leica M-mount in his shop. Actually this made me even more curious about this lens than before. Hamish doesn’t seem like he would give his name/blog to a product he isn’t convinced about. When I contacted him, it took us just a few messages and a 50mm was on it’s way from the UK to me. So, many thanks to Hamish for lending me a lens for a review.

Now back to the lens itself: Is the 7Artisans 50m f1.1 a Noctilux for everyone else?

When I first held the 50mm in my hands I was impressed by the build quality. The focus ring is just right. Not to strongly damped. The aperture ring is clickless – which I personally don’t like too much. For videographers this is an advantage, I guess.

The aperture ring is a bit more damped than the focus ring so that you won’t change the aperture accidentally.

Size and weight are fine as well, and bear in mind I’m someone who is won’t use a Zeiss Distagon ZM 35m f1.4 with his Leica M10.

You will find an aperture scale and a distance scale in feet and meters. Chosing red for the feet scale gives the lens a bit more Leica feeling.

I very much like it that the glass comes 6-bit coded. It’s not too difficult to attach coding to non-Leica glass, but I heard some horror stories about glue getting into camera bodies and such. Maybe this is just story telling but it’s no issue here as when you mount the lens, the camera recognises it as a 50mm Noctilux.

I needed some getting used to the non-linearity of the aperture scale. While changing from f1.1 to f1.4 is a turn of about 1cm to f2 it is about 8mm and from f5.6 to f8 it is just 2mm. These days this is a bit uncommon, while in long gone times it was a common feature.

Since I haven’t had the opportunity to work with a Leica Noctilux I can just guess possible differences between it and the 7Artisans.

Compared to the Leica alternative the 7Artisans 50mm has a closer minimum distance – 0.7m. The Leica sports a 1m limitation here. Very often even 0.7m is too far away for my taste so I am glad that the 50mm 1.1 does not use the same minimum distance as, say, a Zeiss 50mm f1.5 Sonnar. As far as I know the 7Artisans lens is based on a Sonnar and most M-mount Sonnars that I know of have 1m as a minimum distance. But now I reach a point of half-knowledge, so I won’t delve into that any further.

What I really like is the fact, that there is a little screwdriver included in the package to adjust the lens for the rangefinder of your Leica. There are also instructions included how to go about adjusting it.

Another nice point is the lens cap. Yeah, so simple, but it helps a lot: It sits tight and you won’t lose it too easily.

What I don’t like about the lens is the marking for mounting the lens… There’s none! Leica, Voigtländer, Zeiss, Handevision – they all have markings for easily finding the right spot. Not so the 7Artisans. Why? Shooting in sometimes hectic situations this is a bit unnerving.

A focus tab is included in the package, which is a nice trait. You can mount it yourself and while I am not a fan of these, I know that there are a lot of people that make a point of these.

Image quality

When I first saw the price and the „Made in China“ badge, I thought: „No. Non o, this won’t be any good.“ But now, thinking of the first part of my writing here and after seeing the first shots with this lens… Why did I think this in the first place?

First things first: this is no lens for pixelpeepers and nothing for sharpness freaks that look for absolute sharpness with a wide open lens. I would recommend this glass to anyone looking for something special – character.

Wide open the lens is quite soft, already getting sharper and more contrasty by f/1.4. Towards the edges of the frame this gets better around f/4 to f/5.6. In the extreme corners it is never really sharp, I think. At least I found a little smearing in the corners even at f8. But anyways personally I don’t look for that in a f/1.1 glass. Those who want a no compromise sharp glass, look at the fantastic 50mm f/2 Zeiss Planar ZM.

An f/1.1 glass I want to use wide open or at least not much stopped down. I won’t use it for landscapes where you really need sharp edges and corners. An f/1.1 glass is just stopped down when really needed. At least I use it that way. The question is, will the 7Artisans still satisfy me in that respect?!

Of course, with a glass like that you need to look at the quality of it’s Bokeh. Here I have to say: I like it very much! Lights in bokeh are really nice and bubbly. What I find quite interesting is that the bokeh somehow sucks you into the image. I don’t know how to describe it properly. But with bokeh it is like with personal things in life: matters of taste.

At f1.1 you will find chroma in contrasty situations, but well, this is nothing surprising. Still chroma is better controlled than in the Ibelux 40mm f0.85 for Fuji X-mount. With a good RAW-converter this is a matter of a few clicks, nothing to worry about too much.

There is vignetting. And not just a bit. But for me this is just right, I like a little vignetting in my images and sometimes I add it in post- now I don’t need it in my workflow any more.

Sharpness?

About sharpness you can either write very much or next to nothing – either a lens is sharp or not… When working with an f/1.1 lens you have to remember that the combination of 50mm, f1.1 and, say, 1,5m to your subject will result in a veeeeeerrrrryyy thin layer that is in-focus. So the first difficulty lies in finding the right spot to focus on. When you found that, make yourself comfortable with a very thin sharpness layer. So when you zoom into your pictures at 400% (exaggeration… ???? ) you won’t find many sharp pixels. This is just physics and even a 10000€ glass will not prevent you from this.

It is a question of sensefulness wether to magnify your pictures to look for absolute sharpness or to let the image have an impression on you. Sharpness is not everything and those who like to work at f/1.1 – f/1.4 should be not too hard on their equipment, really. In the end it is the whole image that should work. With the 7Artisans 50mm you can get really good and sharp results shooting wide open, but usually this will be with immobile objects.

Some more photos

Conclusion

I really like the 50mm f/1.1!

Pros:

  • Good build quality
  • Small in size and weight given it is quite a fast lens
  • A very fast lens indeed.
  • bokeh
  • Leica coding
  • Adjusting by user is possible
  • Not blocking the viewfinder too much
  • Good lens cap
  • Perfect price!

Cons:

  • Really soft wide open
  • Clickless aperture
  • Strange (to me) aperture control
  • No mount marking
  • No hood mounts – you can only use screw-in hoods.

Now, is the 7Artisans an everyman’s Noctilux? Frankly, I don’t know. (because I don’t know the Noctilux in person.) What I can say, I like the results of the 7Artisans 50mm f1.1 very much. With time and patience I even like to work at f/1.1. From f/1.4 on it is really good. Will I stop down it further? Seldom. Of course this would seem like a one-trick-pony, but you can stop it down if you like and of course you get clean and sharp images at f/8. I also like the bokeh very much – nice bubbles for sure! And not to forget, touch and feel is really top notch.

I ended up buying the 50mm f/1.1, as really, I didn’t want to let it go. Thanks Hamish for selling it! ????

You can buy the 50mm f/1.1 here

You can find more of me here:

Website/Blog (It’s in german, but Google does an ok job at translating)
Instagram
official Fujifilm X-Photographer Page

Share this post:

Find more similar content on 35mmc

Use the tags below to search for more posts on related topics:

Contribute to 35mmc for an ad-free experience.

There are two ways to contribute to 35mmc and experience it without the adverts:

Paid Subscription – £2.99 per month and you’ll never see an advert again! (Free 3-day trial).

Subscribe here.

Content contributor – become a part of the world’s biggest film and alternative photography community blog. All our Contributors have an ad-free experience for life.

Sign up here.

About The Author

By Mehrdad Abedi
Mehrdad Samak-Abedi is an official Fujifilm x photographer and globetrotter. His main interests are in travel, architecture and street photography. Occupation and passion. What could be better?
View Profile

Comments

Miguel on 7Artisans 50mm f1.1 – The Everyman’s Noctilux? – Guest Review by Mehrdad Abedi

Comment posted: 18/12/2017

Nice writeup.

I have really enjoyed my time with the lens as well. It renders even better with film imho, but I've enjoyed in on an A7ii, typ240, and my M7.

https://www.flickr.com/photos/bicyclelad/albums/72157686177874124
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Art Tafil on 7Artisans 50mm f1.1 – The Everyman’s Noctilux? – Guest Review by Mehrdad Abedi

Comment posted: 19/12/2017

I concur with your excellent evaluation of this lens.
I've had mine for a couple of weeks now and even hand held at f/1.1 indoors under normal home lighting, this thing absolutely gobbles up any light!

I paid several hundred dollars (US) for mine and I actually like it better than mu 50mm f/2 Summicron wide open.
I use both lenses on my M9 and the coding is perfect.

I don't know how the Chinese do it but I also have the 50mm f/1.1 in Sony E-mount for APSC. The Sony E-mount version is quite a bit smaller. I also have an Chinese 35mm f/0.95 E-mount APSC lens that is also phenomenal.

Like I said, I do not know how they are doing this?????

There are a few more Chinese lenses I want to try mainly the 12mm f/2 ND (no distortion) lens..
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Brian on 7Artisans 50mm f1.1 – The Everyman’s Noctilux? – Guest Review by Mehrdad Abedi

Comment posted: 19/12/2017

I'm glad you like the lens- it really is an amazing optic, an F1.1 Sonnar similar to the Zunow 5cm F1.1- but at 1/10th the price. Maybe 7Artisans could do a modern "Thambar" for a few hundred as well.

The 50/1.1 Nokton is more like a Noctilix, and is a very reasonable price. A very under-rated lens.

The 7-Artisans, compare with the 50/1.1 Sonnetar- not as quirky, and less than 1/2 the price.

Some comparison shots between the 7artisans and the C-Sonnar:

https://www.leicaplace.com/threads/7artisans-50-1-1-and-zeiss-50-1-5-c-sonnar-visit-gunston-hall.1904/

and between the 7Artisans, 50/1.1 Nokton, and Jupiter-3

https://www.leicaplace.com/threads/7artisans-50-1-1-nokton-50-1-1-and-jupiter-3-50-1-5-visit-gunston-hall.1907/

I bought two of the 7artisans, one for the M9 and the other for the M Monochrom. The latter is optimized for a deep yellow filter. Love the easy-to-adjust cam.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ankur on 7Artisans 50mm f1.1 – The Everyman’s Noctilux? – Guest Review by Mehrdad Abedi

Comment posted: 27/12/2017

Mehrdad, I really enjoyed your review. Your photos are beautiful and you have a lot of skill.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Mehrdad Abedi replied:

Comment posted: 27/12/2017

Thank you Ankur, happy you like the review and my photos as well. ;)

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Roland R. on 7Artisans 50mm f1.1 – The Everyman’s Noctilux? – Guest Review by Mehrdad Abedi

Comment posted: 28/12/2017

Mehrhad, I loved your review and had to order the lens myself. I had it in the mail yesterday and the results are promising, I'm waiting for the good weather ...

Gorgeous pictures and nice blog by the way!

Thank you Hamish for shipping so fast!
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Mehrdad Abedi replied:

Comment posted: 28/12/2017

Great to hear you like my work and blog. Thank you Roland!

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Victor on 7Artisans 50mm f1.1 – The Everyman’s Noctilux? – Guest Review by Mehrdad Abedi

Comment posted: 20/08/2018

Nice pics!
I'm in love with this lens, with a one big BUT. It is absolutely horrendous on Sony a7 :(, and really shines on film generally, although it seems that it does better on digital leicas than on sony.

I did a shootout with a nice jupiter 3 from 1957 (i.e. mine is a good copy), and this thing is sharper in the center at 1.4 than J3 at f16! However, about 1/3 midfield the sharpness of 7A on sony drops like a rock, making all kind of weird artefacts in the process. Doubling lines, chromatic aberrations, strong vignetting, etc. I guess it has something to do with the famous thick filter stack, and that's also the reason behind absolutely horrendous bokeh seen in some of the internet shots (presumably on A7). I thought J3's weak link is even sharpness, but 7A proved this is wrong :) In corners 7A catches up by ~5.6 with J3 wide open. Vignetting is still there though. All this nastiness is all but gone on BW film though (have not yet tested colour, but Hamish shots indicate that colour film is also fine). The sharpness is way more even, the bokeh is much better, the transition between focus/OOF is much better, absolutely stellar. A bit heavy on leica though :( Still, its my go-to lens for some time now, and I can definitively recommend it to anyone shooting BW film on M.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *