Minolta AL-F – Getting to know ALF

By Paul Quellin

Minolta; you might love the brand, or take the view their products were inferior. I know camera branding can elicit these responses. It was a long time ago, but in my late teens I had two Minolta XG2 bodies with various lenses. I was aware that users of some other brands could be sniffy about them, but I felt a real affinity with my XG2s.

Decades later as I started to satisfy my cravings to return to film cameras, there were no XG2s on the horizon that looked right. They either seemed to be tatty or lovely, expensive and in another country. The only Minolta film camera that came my way was an AFZ compact. A crazy flashback to the mid eighties. A Ford XR3i of cameras. Brash plastic, noisy and actually sort of fun; if a little limiting. A roll of Kodak Colorplus produced a few shots that were better than I had anticipated. The AFZ is still in the collection and I ought to load it up again soon, just for the outrageous noises that would negate any attempts at discrete street photography.

A younger generation with no respect

Feeling I was missing out on rangefinders, I was trawling the big auction site for Japanese offerings of this type. A Minolta AL-F showed up; not what I was looking for, but there it was. A Minolta intended for easy use, but from a different era than the AFZ. No mistaking the look; this is Japanese design and manufacture in the late sixties. This was a time when Japan was already producing very well engineered motorcycles and the British manufacturers, dominant for so long, still couldn’t wake from their slumber. The little Minolta AL-F was perhaps not so remarkable, but there is no mistaking quality engineering and Minolta had made it look nice too.

So what was I going to get? Seemingly a quite well built shutter priority rangefinder. A Rokkor lens with just 4 elements. Aware that Minolta did know what they were doing, an offer was duly made and accepted. This Minolta AL-F was to include an original box and case that looked in very good condition.

The AL-F’s eventual arrival wasn’t too much of a disappointment and I quickly decided it was called Alf. I suppose this camera would be one of the early ones in that transition to foam light seals, which might put it’s production around the end of the sixties or even start of the seventies. It was no real surprise to find the seals needed replacing. There was some very minor fungus on the glass, but easily accessible. One mark on the rear element seemed more stubborn, so a good chance this was all a lost cause. A clean up top, taking care of the coating on the rangefinder glass as advised. A new battery, chosen carefully for compatibility, then time to load up.

Results were probably going to be like the weather

This was going to be a clean and sell arrangement if the results were okay, or a shelf ornament if not. A roll of Kentmere Pan 100 and home process to keep the costs down. I set off with the intention of just getting a serviceable frame or two to put in the intended advert. Some fiddling around during the first few frames. Working out how to find the focus ring instead of the slightly too easy to locate speed adjustment. A few more frames and… what’s this? The controls are actually quite nice, the viewfinder is bright, the rangefinder seems quite easy to use. Oh here we go again, falling for another camera I wasn’t supposed to keep. Try to suspend judgment… the shots might all be badly out of focus.

The film went in Atomal 49 and onto the scanner about two days later. Admiration for the little camera followed instantly. I had used my glasses at the time and wasn’t sure this would have worked. The rangefinder seemed to have been pretty much on the nail each time. Exposures were better than I had hoped for. It really did seem to be able to work out a variety of lighting conditions rather well. Here are some results shot in generally dismal and very wet conditions during April:

Perhaps it’ll be okay
On reflection…
Alf… he’s okay. Wish I could say the same for my scanning
You’re welcome Alf

The Minolta AL-F does need an adjustment to the shutter button, as the shutter fires right at the end of the button travel. From what I found online, the shutter button was probably very responsive when new. There will be an adjustment under the top cover I think. The stubborn little mark is still there on the rear lens element and I had been convinced it would be an issue. Yet, looking at the scanned negatives, I couldn’t seem to locate any obvious effects. The selling plan is on ice. Just got to see what the little Minolta can do with a roll of a good colour film. So now Alf is having an extended stay at my house.

Share this post:

Find more similar content on 35mmc

Use the tags below to search for more posts on related topics:

Contribute to 35mmc for an ad-free experience.

There are two ways to contribute to 35mmc and experience it without the adverts:

Paid Subscription – £2.99 per month and you’ll never see an advert again! (Free 3-day trial).

Subscribe here.

Content contributor – become a part of the world’s biggest film and alternative photography community blog. All our Contributors have an ad-free experience for life.

Sign up here.

About The Author

By Paul Quellin
Very keen photographer in the 1980s, then there was a gap. Came back to find digital and gradually embraced it. A hankering for film persisted though and eventually a hybrid photographer has emerged. Lots of work I need to do on digital, but the feel of film cameras and the anticipation of the results is special to me. Can't stop buying old film cameras. My output is quite varied and whilst film is slowing me down a bit, I would always rather push that shutter button and take a chance than leave it for a better day.
View Profile

Comments

Graham Line on Minolta AL-F – Getting to know ALF

Comment posted: 18/07/2024

In the 1970s I worked with a professional newspaper photographer who used the Minolta SRT series SLRs. The lenses were absolutely amazing; I later worked with a Minolta CLE rangefinder and the body and lenses were excellent and completely reliable.
The issue with my friend's SRT system was that the bodies didn't quite hold up to the three or four rolls of film a day that were being put through them but that's a pretty high level of use -- well beyond what your camera will experience. His solution was having three bodies, two to work with and an extra to cover him during the periodic tune-up trips to the technician's. It was generally adjustments to the winding or exposure meter. Nothing major but maintenance that was needed.
He was a good photograper with any camera, but the Minolta lenses were definitely special.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Bob Janes replied:

Comment posted: 18/07/2024

Interesting that they had the 'CLC' engraving on the front - I thought that was supposed to require two cds sensors. I note also that the lens just says Rokkor - at the time they tended to add a letter at the end of 'Rokkor' indicating how many elements were in the lens (so for a 4-element lens I would expect 'Rokkor-D'). I guess it just shows that conventions were not always kept to...

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Paul Quellin replied:

Comment posted: 18/07/2024

Thanks Graham, that is encouraging. I have just taken promised roll of colour film out of the AL-F and most of it was shot in somewhat better light conditions than we endured in April, so I am hoping the little camera will shine.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Bob Janes on Minolta AL-F – Getting to know ALF

Comment posted: 18/07/2024

Interesting read. There were a lot of good fixed lens rangefinder cameras around at the time and Minolta made some very nice ones. I would not expevt the spot on the rear element to show up - in effect it is so out of focus with regards to the film plane that it is just reducing the overall light transmission (and then only by a small amount unless it is huge...)
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Paul Quellin replied:

Comment posted: 18/07/2024

Thank you Bob. The Minolta is certainly quite pleasant to use, probably on account of the viewfinder as much as anything. I still fumble for the focus knob now and again, but you do develop a rhythm with it. Just finished a roll of colour in it and I took two shots with an old Sunpak flash, so quite interested to see how they worked out. have since acquired a second AL-F and the rear element looks like it might be a little better than this one, so I may try swapping them out. If I do that I'll try and work out if what I read about the elements is correct. I didn't Minolta's D suffix might relate to the number of elements. I always appreciate your detailed insights, thank you.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Bob Janes replied:

Comment posted: 18/07/2024

My mistake - I'd misremembered.. Minolta use a two letter code on their SR lenses - with the first letter showing number of groups and the second, number of elements... It was Olympus that prefix the Zuiko with a letter to show the number of elements (so the 35SP n has a G.Zuiko, with 7 elements)..

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Paul Quellin replied:

Comment posted: 18/07/2024

Thank you again Bob, you're amazing. I had wondered why Mr Zuiko seemed to have had several different first names.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Bob Janes replied:

Comment posted: 18/07/2024

Looks like the lens may be the same as in the Minolta Hi matic F, which also sports an f/2.7 lens with 4 elements...

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ibraar Hussain on Minolta AL-F – Getting to know ALF

Comment posted: 18/07/2024

Thanks for the enjoyable write up and the pleasing photography
Not familiar with this camera but am now!
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Paul Quellin replied:

Comment posted: 18/07/2024

Thanks Ibraar. There don't seem to be too many of them around although Minolta made a variety of other similar machines with various model names.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Gioacchino Artesiano Pagliuca on Minolta AL-F – Getting to know ALF

Comment posted: 18/07/2024

Hello, beautiful cameras, I have a HI Matic 7S, which I am very happy with. I would like to buy an AL-F, could you tell me if the camera shoots mechanically even without the PX 625 battery in the exposure meter? Thanks, and congratulations for the photos.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Paul Quellin replied:

Comment posted: 18/07/2024

Hi Gioacchino. I have always liked the look of the HI Matic 7s too. I actually have a second AL-F that I haven't cleaned up and checked yet but the shutter is firing. Unfortunately it arrived minus the shutter button, so I have picked up an EE as I think it may have the same shutter button. Yes, the shutter is mechanical and the battery only drives the metering, so I suppose you could still operate with 'Sunny 16' if the battery was dead or the meter failed. I have found the metering in mine seems quite accurate and copes well with lighting I think will challenge it. Thank you for getting in touch.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Eugen Mezei replied:

Comment posted: 18/07/2024

The surprising thing is, I just verified it (as I had to remove the battery anyhow, my AL-F goes to storage after I just removed the roll of HP5+ from it finished a few monts ago; film also goes into the fridge until we have more developing suitable temperatures), that the shutter seems to fire at different speeds even without batteries. At least I get the feeling it is a difference between 1/30 and 1/500s.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Daniel Castelli on Minolta AL-F – Getting to know ALF

Comment posted: 20/07/2024

Nice article reminding all that these cameras were producing quite decent results. I always liked Minolta lenses, and my primary camera is the Leitz-Minolta CL w/the () quite remarkable m-Rokkor 40mm lens.
I taught photo classes for 35+ years and we had quite a few Minoltas donated to the program, both the SLR’s and the rangefinder styles. They produced consistent results, took a beating from high school students, and were friendly to operate.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *