Kodak 66 II

Kodak 66 II – a refreshingly simple 6×6 folding camera

By Julian Tanase

Back in 2000, when I was making some feeble attempts to return to medium format, I had a few choices regarding cameras suitable for me. Obviously, one of the best was the Rolleiflex TLR, but the cost and the purpose of buying an expensive camera put me off this excellent piece of technology, at the time. I became the owner of this camera model a bit later, getting two of them actually, a 2.8F and a 3.5E. Still have them, beautiful things they are.

Anyways, at the time I borrowed a Seagull 4A from a friend of mine, and while it was an interesting camera, I found it a bit quirky mainly because of the dim focusing screen. Then, in 2001, visited a shop in Brighton, while on a weekend break. There, a neat and very portable Kodak 66 folder was just waiting for me. Cheap and in good condition, looked nice, so I got it for the price of a couple of pints.

Kodak 66 II closed

Actually, this camera is the 2nd model (model  II) of the Kodak 66’s line, produced between 1958 and 1960. From what I’ve learned, it was Kodak’s only post-war folder for type 120 film; there was never a model I, and this model II was followed by model III. Anyways, this 75mm lens is a Kodak Anaston 6.3, and this is one of the two lenses that came with the model, the other being 4.5.

The shutter speeds are not in abundance (B, 1/25, 1/75, 1/200), but this is ok if you use the right film, I guess; the whole thing is set in a Vario clockwork. Apertures range from 6.3 to 22, but if you take the slider beyond 22 it gives what I believe to be an even smaller opening (functionally, it would appear to go beyond 22). The camera takes (obviously) 120 film, and it shoots it in 12 frames, in 6×6 format.

Kodak 66 II open front

Focus is by distance, in feet only, assisted by a telescopic viewfinder: closest is at 3.5 up to 50 and infinity. My distance dial is a bit stiff but that is good, seeing that another folder I have (a Welta Weltix) has a very mobile focusing ring, and sometimes it has a mind of its own, when I accidentally touch it.

Strut wise, it is an excellent mechanism, and it extends by itself upon the push of the button. The bellows are in good condition, and I do hope they stay the same in the future, for I’ll probably never get it sent to be repaired.

Kodak 66 II top

The top plate sports the release button (red), which is very comfortable. The cold shoe and strut releasing button is next to the shoe, and of course there two knobs for winding and rewinding the film. A metal plate tells you what camera you have in your hand.

I must say this: simple as it obviously is, this Kodak 66 is a real pleasure to use. It is light, it is pocketable, it gives you 12 frames on medium format film, it has simple settings that in no way, shape or manner can obstruct you to take good photographs, with the proper film and in the right conditions of course. It has its moments and quirks, but how enjoyable it is nonetheless.

These photographs were taken with a Romanian-produced film, Azopan PS-24 (200ASA), shot at 25. The film expired in 1985 or so. The sun was really harsh that day, and some of the shots are witness to my mistakes in judging the Sunny 16 conditions. Bit of vignette, but that adds to the vintage feeling of the image, I guess. Anyways, for what is worth, some of the images I do like, some I consider sub par to what this camera can deliver, but again, whatever mistake is there, it’s mine. All in all, it was a good day, had fun (again) with this folder.

 

Share this post:

Find more similar content on 35mmc

Use the tags below to search for more posts on related topics:

Contribute to 35mmc for an ad-free experience.

There are two ways to contribute to 35mmc and experience it without the adverts:

Paid Subscription – £2.99 per month and you’ll never see an advert again! (Free 3-day trial).

Subscribe here.

Content contributor – become a part of the world’s biggest film and alternative photography community blog. All our Contributors have an ad-free experience for life.

Sign up here.

About The Author

By Julian Tanase
I am a traveller, entrepreneur, author and amateur photographer. A long time user of classic cameras and film, attracted mostly to photojournalism. I try to instigate people to see rather than look.
View Profile

Comments

Steviemac on Kodak 66 II – a refreshingly simple 6×6 folding camera

Comment posted: 19/09/2024

Well done using such an unsung hero as this cheap Kodak. Cameras like this are great fun, and in my view, better than the Holga type. You got great results considering the age of the film, and it'd be worth trying an in date film such a Ilford FP4 or HP5. If you detect any pinpricks in the bellows, use some black fabric Tesa Tape. It easily moulds to shape and allows the bellows to open and close.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Julian Tanase replied:

Comment posted: 19/09/2024

Looks like for now the bellows are intact. Thanks for the tip, Steviemac !

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Gary Smith on Kodak 66 II – a refreshingly simple 6×6 folding camera

Comment posted: 19/09/2024

I'm curious Julian, when the urge to shoot 120 hits how often do you reach for the Rollieflex TLR v. the light-weight Kodak? I find that I'd rather shoot my Perkeo II rather than the heavier Mamiya 645. Since I have begun processing and scanning my own b&w 135 again, I may never shoot any 120 again. Or, maybe I'll drift into developing color and rig up something to scan 120 although the Valoi Easy35 is certainly easy.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Julian Tanase replied:

Comment posted: 19/09/2024

To be honest, shooting the Kodak 66 is something that does not occur often, mainly due to the lack of higher speeds on that Vario shutter. When I want to shoot 120, the Rolleiflex is the camera I go to. I usually shoot bw films, which I develop and scan myself. In the rare occasions I choose to shoot 120 color, I go for either Ektachrome or Portra 400. These are developed by ,y lab and returned to me for scanning. I like the Valoi system, although I do not have one (yet). As far as I know, Valoi also has 120 (besides the usual ones) masks in their inventory, so that will be a must when I will order my kit from them.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Tony Warren on Kodak 66 II – a refreshingly simple 6×6 folding camera

Comment posted: 19/09/2024

Good results Julian, especially given the lighting conditions and the age of the equipment and materials. Always satisfying. Also interesting to see what this handy camera can produce. It is the basis for my 120 film stripper but I was unable to use it to take photographs because the drop-down front had been squashed un-repairably out of shape when it was given to me.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Julian Tanase replied:

Comment posted: 19/09/2024

Thank you, Tony. Good use for a bashed camera, your film stripper. I like when people use these beyond repair machines to do something useful with them, instead of throwing them in the bin.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Zheng Li on Kodak 66 II – a refreshingly simple 6×6 folding camera

Comment posted: 20/09/2024

Hi Julian, nice results from the venerable Kodak folder and the Anaston lens. I found the Kodak made Tessar-like lenses like Anaston, Asastar, Anastigmat Special are all good performers.

When you said "The camera takes (obviously) 120 film", I chuckled a bit. Kodak cameras of that era were almost entirely 620 (Kodak's proprietary format to lock in profit), instead of 120. I guess only a few European/UK models like yours adopted the more locally popular 120 roll film. In the used market, hardly anybody wants those 620 folders today even though they often have good lenses.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Julian Tanase replied:

Comment posted: 20/09/2024

Zheng, really appreciated. Given proper conditions, I am certain this lens can perform much better than it did in my hands. To be honest, I took the camera out for a walk because I felt its sadness of not being used in a very long time :) . Re the film format being "obvious", it was meant to be something for people to chuckle to, which apparently worked :) .

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Geoff Chaplin on Kodak 66 II – a refreshingly simple 6×6 folding camera

Comment posted: 20/09/2024

I never understood why people worry about vignetting - does anything interesting ever happen in the corners? An impressive set of photos given the basic nature of the camera - but it does show all you really need is something to hold the film flat, a decent lens and some accurate shutter speeds. My own experience with folders has not been a happy one: perforated bellows and light leaks from elsewhere. Looking at the external condition of the bellows on this I'm surprised there wasn't a problem.
Thanks Julian, as always an informative and well illustrated article.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Julian Tanase replied:

Comment posted: 20/09/2024

Geoff, I completely see your point, re vignetting. While I am not one for this effect, I mean not particularly looking for it, I do not runaway from a good photography with vignettes showing. One has to take this as a given, when using old cameras of this sort. Thank you, appreciated !

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *