Light Lens Lab Nine Element 28mm

Light Lens Lab Nine Element 28mm f/2.8 review

By vincentbihler

Light Lens Lab surely has been one of the most interesting (to my eyes) lens makers in the recent years. This is for a couple of reasons: they try to replicate some of the most legendary lenses made by Leica at a reasonable price, with performances that are optimised for today’s standards. The previous lens I reviewed for them – the LLL 8 element 35mm f2 – was globally a very good performer for film users with its classic rendering / sharp pictures / minimal distortion / tiny size. The only small complaint I had about it was corner sharpness that could have been better optimised. It was necessary to stop it down to f5.6-f8 to get sharp corners on landscapes. A couple of months back, Light Lens Lab sent to me their newest released lens, the Light Lens Lab Nine Element 28mm 2.8 which is a replica of the otherwise super rare Elmarit 28mm f2.8 v1, aka 9 element elmarit.

28mm is not particularly my favourite focal length, but once in a while I do appreciate using one for street or travel pictures. I started documenting myself about that first elmarit and was a little bit surprised about the original lens’s performance. It’s a lens that, beside its rarity, was not very appealing to me considering the next versions made real improvements in all aspects. But the Light Lens Lab 28mm 9 element seems different. MTF charts suggested a very high sharpness level already wide open! How awesome would that be to have a replica of this super rare lens, with usability from an imaging standpoint too!

Let’s dive into this review and see if the promises made by Light Lens Lab actually meet the expectations.

Light Lens Lab Nine Element 28mm

Mechanics and haptics

Those who read my previous review already know Light Lens Lab are not kidding when it comes to build quality. Their lenses are usually very dense, very well made with perfect calibration. Long story short, this one feels like this too. It is of an exceptional build quality, feeling better than my Leica Summilux 35mm ASPH to be honest. These people know how to make quality stuff from a mechanical standpoint. It is a very dense, hefty lens. Materials are all superb, engravings very precise, paint job is flawless. You do get the infinity lock, once more, that can’t be removed or permanently unlocked (I still hope that one day we’ll get the choice to use it or not). This time the lens was provided with a lens hood too. It is about the same build as the lens, not a single plastic bit here, only metal. My little small complaint is that the hood has some play once clipped with the lens. It can make a bit of noise while walking. Besides that, it is an impressive job. Notice also that the red “CHINA” I was complaining about on the front ring of the 8 element replica is now gone, and this is for the best I believe. The elegant Chinese script is still present at the bottom of the lens.

Light Lens Lab Nine Element 28mm

Then there is the form factor, copied from the original lens and obviously the whole point of it as a replica. But to my eyes, it is unfortunately a bit bigger than what I would like a 28mm f2.8 to be. It’s not big per se, but so much bigger than the 35mm f2. But then again, they wouldn’t make it smaller anyways as the whole point of these lenses is to get as close as possible to the original version.

Light Lens Lab Nine Element 28mm

Optical performances

Here is the biggest surprise. Whether it is on a digital camera (Zf, M-P 240) or on film (M6), the Light Lens Lab Nine Element 28mm delivers superb sharpness, already wide open. At f4, it is sharp to the corners. A very good performer.

I do notice a very slight vignetting wide open, but it is very reasonable. Stopping the lens down and it becomes beautifully uniform.

As you might see, despite the moderate f2.8 aperture, the lens does a pretty good job at isolating your subject. The lens packs micro-contrast in the center portion of the picture that helps making the subject pop out of the frame. It has a really nice rendering to my eyes with both very slight vintage glow around highlights and high contrasts.

About distortion, there seem to be a hint of distortion, but honestly most of the time it is pretty much nonexistent to my eyes. None of these pictures have been corrected for it. So, excellent job.

The only real complaint I have is actually with flaring. I found the lens to be very prone to flaring unfortunately, even with the lens hood on. I actually did not remove the lens hood at all. On some lenses, flaring can be nice, but on this one it is more the kind of flare that washes the picture out. So you should take a lot of care when the sun hits around the corners of your frame.

All in all, I feel the Light Lens Lab Nine Element 28mm can be the perfect weapon for those seeking great landscape capabilities, architecture or streets. The only area where the lens might lack a bit is with light gathering capabilities. Being “only” a f2.8 lens, You’ll start having trouble getting sharp pictures in dim light, not because of the lens, but because of slow shutter speeds required at such settings.

Light Lens Lab Nine Element 28mm f/2 Summary and Conclusions

Pros:

  • Beautifully made, flawless finish.
  • Very sharp, corner to corner, totally usable for landscapes at f4.
  • Low distortion.
  • Hood is very welcome in the package!

Cons:

  • Only f2.8, for the size, it’s a bit sad for me. But it’s part of the original lens design obviously.
  • Hood wobble.
  • Flare resistance is not so good.

To conclude, I would say the Light Lens Lab Nine Element 28mm is a great option if you want a very sharp 28mm lens, are not afraid with its size (compared with other currently sold 28mm f2.8 M mount lenses) and don’t mind some occasional flaring. You’ll be rewarded with outstanding build quality that actually matches the original and produces beautifully detailed pictures.

The historic value of the lens is also very interesting and will please passionate people carving for such pieces. One again, Light Lens Lab have made a lens that, I think, is not supposed to interest all photographers. It is more aimed people that actually like the experience of having an historical (improved) and interesting piece of gear in its hands.

Price-wise (970 euros including the hood), I feel that it is not exaggerated considering how well this thing is built and how sharp the pictures are. As a comparison point, the Voigtlander Color Skopar 28mm f2.8 is priced at 700 euros. You’ll pay a little premium over the Skopar for the Light Lens Lab lens, but I think the build and historical value mostly justifies the gap. 

Don’t hesitate to share your option in the comments section.

More pictures

If you like my work, check out my personal instagram, and if my Leica handles or fine leather straps interests you, you can check my website or go on kamerakraft instagram.

 

Share this post:

Find more similar content on 35mmc

Use the tags below to search for more posts on related topics:

Contribute to 35mmc for an ad-free experience.

There are two ways to contribute to 35mmc and experience it without the adverts:

Paid Subscription – £2.99 per month and you’ll never see an advert again! (Free 3-day trial).

Subscribe here.

Content contributor – become a part of the world’s biggest film and alternative photography community blog. All our Contributors have an ad-free experience for life.

Sign up here.

About The Author

By vincentbihler
Film photographer and founder of Kamerakraft brand.
View Profile

Comments

Graham Line on Light Lens Lab Nine Element 28mm f/2.8 review

Comment posted: 20/01/2025

A very nice set of photos. The inherent problem of replicas is being trapped into the limitations of the original. It would be interesting to see the performances of the Minolta CLE 28/2.8 and this lens compared.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

vincentbihler replied:

Comment posted: 20/01/2025

True, it is the problem of replicas, and in the same time, not really the problem because people that usually buy replicas are interested in the original lens also, I guess. The Minolta M 28 2.8 is a much more recent formula. I'm pretty sure it would behave closer to the Elmarit 28mm f2.8 v4 in terms of performances).

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Gary Smith on Light Lens Lab Nine Element 28mm f/2.8 review

Comment posted: 20/01/2025

I had to look up the price on the LLL 28/2.8 to see where it sat relative to my Voigtländer 21/4. There's a substantial difference in price but it also appears that the LLL lens is substantially better. When I purchased the Voigtländer, I specifically wanted a Color-Skopar lens since I already had Color-Skopars on both my Voigtländer VITO CLR and Perkeo II. I've shot the 21/4 on my M3 as well as on my Sony a7R3 (with the Voigtländer m-to-e adapter) and it is just "OK".

Your shots are great Vincent and I had to take a look at your web site while poking around. Seems that you have a vested interest in Leica shooters!
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

vincentbihler replied:

Comment posted: 20/01/2025

The Voigtlander Skopar 21 f4 seems to be sold for 500€ new. But it is not a rare lens, pretty common and built much much less substantially. The Light lens lab is in another league. Skopar lenses have amazing price / performances ratios, especially second hand. But it's hard to compare them with this kind of product which doesn't aim the same kind of persons. Thank you for the kind words also :)

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Eric Rose on Light Lens Lab Nine Element 28mm f/2.8 review

Comment posted: 20/01/2025

The flare as shown is a real issue for me. It's just not a little bit, it's a LOT with image ruining effect. I would have liked to see some colour images to see how it renders. The f2.8 is not an issue for me as I would probably be using it on a digital camera that has great high ISO abilities. Beyond that great review and loved your photos.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

vincentbihler replied:

Comment posted: 20/01/2025

It is definitely the most disappointing trait of the lens. Thanks for the appreciation :)

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Jeffery Luhn on Light Lens Lab Nine Element 28mm f/2.8 review

Comment posted: 21/01/2025

Vincent,
Your shots are great!! Thank you for a well written article.
Your post makes me glad I'm not a Leica user. I know Leica quality is the absolute tops, but how much better is it than the blue collar Nikon gear?
Nearly $900 for a non-Leica lens that flares? Gosh, that requires real dedication to the brand and specific lens mount to plunk out that much cash.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

vincentbihler replied:

Comment posted: 21/01/2025

The thing is it is not about Leica or not Leica, but mostly rangefinder vs SLR. Anything rangefinder costs more than SLR gear. Are there reasons to shoot rangefinder over SLR? Definitely (better wides usually, smaller, less shutter noise...). Is it reasonable? It depends on peoples preferences and budget. For me personally, I use both systems (I love my Nikon F3), but most of the time, I use my rangefinder. Also, these replicas are not aimed at people that look for the best bang for the buck. It is a niche product for a niche market. Just like people that drive classic cars or listen to vinyles. Thanks for the kind words !

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Jeffery Luhn replied:

Comment posted: 21/01/2025

All true. Very true.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Eric on Light Lens Lab Nine Element 28mm f/2.8 review

Comment posted: 23/01/2025

Great review and images. Thank you for sharing. Had me shopping for another M lens for a minute..
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

vincentbihler replied:

Comment posted: 23/01/2025

Thanks for the kind words :)

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Michael on Light Lens Lab Nine Element 28mm f/2.8 review

Comment posted: 23/01/2025

Enjoyed your review. I owned the LLL 35mm 8 element and was blown away by the build quality.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

vincentbihler replied:

Comment posted: 23/01/2025

Thank you! Yes the 8e replica is a great little lens. It's (one of) my 35mm daily driver.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Robert Stacy on Light Lens Lab Nine Element 28mm f/2.8 review

Comment posted: 03/02/2025

Great all round review - thank you.

I've owned this lens for the past couple of months and must agree with all of the cons, and yet they are quite minor to how the lens renders. And sometimes the flares, albeit unpredictable, deliver quite nice results in their own unexpected way.

I own all of the Light Lens offerings - it started out of curiosity but they have become my daily carries. They feel substantial, deliver something that has a distinctive feeling, and don't break the bank. I like the improbability of this company existing and what they are trying to deliver to the market. Creatively, I am working on an upcoming project about Mongolia and it has allowed me to put a distinctive visual signature on the work, which I hope others will appreciate.

I do know there are some who won't use or try it because they see it as just a copy or a ripoff of prior work. I disagree particularly because of how they are not targeting anything currently in production and because I think there is innovation in the current offerings which allows for optimized pairing with digital sensors, not just film cameras.

It's great kit
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *