10 Shots in 10 Minutes on a Leica M3 with Kodak Ultramax 400 in Banff, Alberta

By Scott Ferguson

Showing my family the grandeur of the Canadian Rockies was not going to plan.  My wife and son had flown in from New York a few days before and the centerpiece of the trip was the Canadian Remembrance Day 3 day weekend, and we’d splurged on rooms at the Fairmont Banff Springs, a grand old palace of a hotel built by the Canadian Pacific Railroad in the late 19th century to lure tourists to use the transcontinental railroad they had just completed.

Heading west from Calgary on Canada’s Route 1, driving in a straight line into the Rockies is always a bit of a thrill that never disappoints as the mountains slowly get bigger and bigger and bigger before suddenly you are in them.  Except for that day — that day it was a full white out.

We had planned a couple of ‘greatest hits’ stops on the way up to Banff, including Canmore’s famous “Three Sisters.”  We took a desultory walk around Quarry Lake that might have been a great foggy photowalk on the East Coast where you didn’t feel like you were missing out on anything.  But knowing that one of the most beautiful landscapes in North America is sitting there unseen behind an impenetrable cloudbank made us fee that more ‘sightseeing’ that afternoon was a fool’s errand, so we decided to drive straight on to Banff and hope we could get into our rooms early.

The Canadian Rockies obscured by clouds from Quarry Lake, Canmore, Alberta on November 9, 2024 shot with a Leica M3, Leitz Summaron 35mm f2.8, Kodak Ultramax 400

Fortunately, the hotel was ready for us and we got settled into our rooms which were lovely, with spectacular views of the Bow River Valley and Mount Rundle that we would have been able to see on most other days of the year.  My son was happy to take an afternoon nap, and my wife was enjoying settling into the plush bath robe and slippers.  But I was feeling the lure of the M3 sitting there in my bag barely used that day.  The fog looked like it was lifting just a bit, so I decided to take the Leica out in hopes I might grab a few shots at dusk and still have plenty of time to get ready for dinner at the big hotel restaurant, which makes you feel like you’re in a Wes Anderson film.

I’m still early in my journey of learning old school all manual film photography on vintage equipment, and there have been plenty of times when I’ve spent most of a photo outing struggling to get any good photos at all.  This was especially true when I first started shooting and was so excited to try out the ‘new’ vintage cameras that we had just acquired as a gift.  (The story of how we acquired the cameras is in my 35mmc post “Shooting Leica Ms and a Hasselblad 500 CM in the Canadian Rockies, https://www.35mmc.com/16/02/2025/shooting-leica-ms-and-a-hasselblad-500-cm-in-the-canadian-rockies/.)  I would find myself out in the middle of the day snapping away, trying to will good photos into existence out of less than promising conditions.  I think I had somehow convinced myself that the images would come out better than they looked through the viewfinder because I had a famous camera.

After a couple rounds of seeing the crushing results and trying to learn from the few photos I did like, I started to develop more patience to wait until what I saw in the viewfinder looked like it might make a good photo.  Not surprisingly, the photos got better.  Even then, sometimes the day just doesn’t give you what you hoped for when you set out.  I’ve learned not to burn a lot of film on those days unless I see something that is interesting enough to overlook less than ideal conditions.

And then there are some days and some locations where it’s hard to take a bad picture – when the weather is either gorgeous or interestingly moody, and the setting offers worthy subjects or vistas or both.  And despite what had been a very inauspicious start to our holiday weekend, in the fading light of a short winter’s day in Canada I found myself in one of those moments and settings on the terrace of our hotel.

Leica M3, Leitz Summicron Dual Range 50 mm, f2. Kodak Ultramax

It was ‘blue hour’ and the sky was dropping quickly…

The warm tungsten lights inside the hotel and on the stone pillars lining the terrace were starting to come on.  It felt spooky, romantic, eerie, calm and quiet all at once.

Doing blue hour shots on the terrace of the hotel wasn’t something I had thought of in advance, but sometimes showing up with a loaded camera may lead to something better than a planned shoot.  I was about halfway through a roll of Kodak Ultramax — luckily a 400 ASA film. Going wide open, I had about 10 minutes of shooting at shutter speeds that were sustainable for handheld photography before I lost it.  Going up to grab the tripod would have meant missing the shootable window altogether. But everywhere I looked in every direction, there was something cool, or layers of cool things receding into the foggy night.

There were some cool people taking a selfie…

And then coolest and strangest of all, there was a glass dome in the courtyard where an attractive couple were having a private meal under the dusky sky.

I found myself fascinated by that image and shot out what was left on my roll wandering around the terrace catching it from different angles.

It felt very cinematic — maybe fodder for a remake of “Don’t Look Now” set in a luxury hotel in the Canadian Rockies.

Or maybe a sequence where a photographer hangs enlarged prints all over his studio in the configuration of the hotel courtyard, obsessively studying them to try to figure out what is going on, like David Hemings in “Blow Up.”

And then with one last shot, I was both out of film and out of light.

There you have it, 10 shots in 10 minutes!

Despite the gloomy forecast, the next day was beautiful and we drove up the Icefields Parkway and got some gorgeous photos of glaciers, snowcapped mountains, and alpine lakes.  It was one of those days where it’s hard to take a bad picture and my son got to see what I had been talking about so much for so long in the heart of the Canadian Rockies.

Lake Peyto, Hasselblad 500 CM, Zeiss 60mm Distagon f3.5, Portra 400

Share this post:

Find more similar content on 35mmc

Use the tags below to search for more posts on related topics:

Contribute to 35mmc for an ad-free experience.

There are two ways to contribute to 35mmc and experience it without the adverts:

Paid Subscription – £2.99 per month and you’ll never see an advert again! (Free 3-day trial).

Subscribe here.

Content contributor – become a part of the world’s biggest film and alternative photography community blog. All our Contributors have an ad-free experience for life.

Sign up here.

About The Author

By Scott Ferguson
Scott Ferguson is an independent film and television producer known for such films as Brokeback Mountain, Only Lovers Left Alive and The People vs. Larry Flynt, and the television shows The Night Of and Succession. While working around cameras and recorded images for his entire career, shooting still photography with vintage all manual cameras is a new and very stimulating passion.
View Profile

Comments

Martin on 10 Shots in 10 Minutes on a Leica M3 with Kodak Ultramax 400 in Banff, Alberta

Comment posted: 20/02/2025

I hope your place won't get trashed, though.
Great pics and story. Thanks for sharing them with us!
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scott Ferguson replied:

Comment posted: 20/02/2025

Thanks Martin! That was a fun weekend and a very cool evening.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Bill Brown on 10 Shots in 10 Minutes on a Leica M3 with Kodak Ultramax 400 in Banff, Alberta

Comment posted: 20/02/2025

I would recommend trying E-100 at blue hour. A slower film soaking in the color in a extended exposure. Having used Kodachrome 64 and Ektar 25 during blue hour as I shot Dallas cityscapes I lean towards a deeper cobalt / prussian blue tonality. But a tripod is mandatory and you only get a few shots in. I'm still curious though if blue hour varies in intensity from one geographic location to another. As I mentioned in my previous reply I too think the Icefields Parkway is the single most beautiful stretch of road I've ever driven in my lifetime. Dallas cityscape or Banff landscape, well visually there's no comparison but I enjoy photographing my home base just the same.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scott Ferguson replied:

Comment posted: 20/02/2025

Thanks Bill, I have some 120 Ektachrome that I've been planning to shoot with the Hasselblad at some point, and I think some blue hour shots from a tripod would be amazing. I'm very curious about what qualities I might get shooting reversal film vs. negative -- I accidentally shot one roll of Ektachrome a few months ago when I thought I was loading Ektar, and the results were ok but not amazing, but that was probably more me and the location than any issue with the stock. I had an idea about shooting at a certain location in NYC that would look amazing at blue hour, so I may bring a roll of Ektachrome, inspired by our dialogue and who knows, that might be in a future post. I am really enjoying shooting slower speeds with the Hasselblad, I just got back some really cool shot of an icy canyon that I shot on a Rollei 25 speed b&w stock that looked amazing. All that being said, having the Leica loaded with a 400 iso stock leaves you open for something unexpected like that evening in Banff, which I also love. Your question about the intensity of blue hour by various regions is really interesting, something I might want to do some further R&D, and maybe talk to some of my friends in the camera world who have a lot of experience shooting in blue hour for film and tv.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Jeffery Luhn on 10 Shots in 10 Minutes on a Leica M3 with Kodak Ultramax 400 in Banff, Alberta

Comment posted: 20/02/2025

Scott,

Thanks for the nice writing and great photos!

Speaking for myself: a longtime film photographer, then videographer, and now film guy again, creating images with manual cameras and film never loses its allure. Your background gives you a leg up, for sure, and it will give you a better success-to-disappointment ratio than a novice. But, as I'm sure you're seeing, getting good results on film, when it happens, is a reward that never gets old. Despite the challenges.
I hope you keep posting because I enjoy your stuff!
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scott Ferguson replied:

Comment posted: 20/02/2025

Thanks Jeffery! My background in filmed entertainment has been a bit of a blessing and a curse. On the upside, I do have a certain amount of comfort and basic understanding of the technology, and a lot of inspiration from watching lots and lots of filmed images over the years. On the down side, I think I might have been a bit overconfident in the beginning from watching many brilliant cinematographers manage to shoot very nice looking images all day long no matter what nature was giving us on set -- they make something very hard look very easy. Also on the down side, it can be intimidating to see what people at the highest end of the craft are capable of while taking your early baby steps. I do see great progress over the last 7 months, mainly in having less and less truly crappy shots on any given roll along with a lot more that are in the very acceptable mid to upper range of nice looking photos. Getting something that feels truly exciting or compelling requires a bit of luck and timing, but once you know how to focus and expose a frame of film, I think 95% of that is just being there with your camera ready to shoot. And yes, when you get one of those shots, it's really exciting!

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Gary Smith on 10 Shots in 10 Minutes on a Leica M3 with Kodak Ultramax 400 in Banff, Alberta

Comment posted: 20/02/2025

Shooting "blue hour" in the blue Canadian Rockies (ok, not really the Rockies) certainly results in a blue cast.

Thanks for sharing!
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scott Ferguson replied:

Comment posted: 20/02/2025

Thanks Gary, Yes, these came out very blue when I got them back from processing. I found a lot of what I shot in Calgary coming back with bit of a blue shift -- I think you can see it a bit in the daytime shot at the end of the piece as well where the sky and Lake Peyto and the shadows on the mountain are all quite blue. I did a little R&D and read somewhere that you can have a blue shift when shooting in high elevations. NOTE: I do a little minor adjusting of shots coming out of the lab on Lightroom, mainly fine tuning exposure, but I wouldn't know how to do color correction. I may have corrected for this a bit in camera with either a UV or a "skylight" filter, but I ended up kind of getting used to and liking the blue shift on shots like these and accepting it as part of the film vs digital experience.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scott Ferguson replied:

Comment posted: 20/02/2025

It also occurs to me that lens choice may be a factor in the blue shift and it may be more pronounced on vintage lenses. The first shot of the piece with the shot of Quarry Lake doesn't have a noticeable blue shift. I think it was shot with a fairly recent Summilux 1.4 ASPH that I've read may essentially be an APO lens without advertising it, whereas my Summicron 50mm DR is from the early 60's and the Hasselblad lenses are all from the early 70's. When I shoot color on the Summilux it looks very different from what I've been shooting on vintage lenses. Sometimes I like it, but other times I like the vintage look better, and part of the next phase in my journey will be learning to use the inherent quality of different lenses to get different results.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scott Ferguson replied:

Comment posted: 20/02/2025

Flag on the play on that last comment regarding the Summilux! I now recall that I didn’t own that lens yet at that point. If I had, I surely would have been using it on the terrace to get that extra stop vs the Summicron! I think the Quarry Lake shot was probably with the 35mm Summaron f2.8 and the color differences might be in the lenses and due to the color of the light in the middle of the day vs dusk into post sundown.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *