5 frames with a Voigtländer Bessa R2, a Nokton 35/1,4 and a roll of an expired Kodak Portra 160

By Andrea Monti

Tevere, the river that divides Rome in two, is one of my favourite places. No matter how much chaos there is in the ‘high places’: walking along the banks of the river puts you in another dimension, where time has no meaning and the pace slows down.


Anchored boats stand still, in stark contrast to the fast-moving streets, crowded with cars, bicycles, pedestrians and tourists who have returned in droves once the pandemic is over.


This is obviously a mirror image, but it looks as if it has been projected onto a digital screen.


And here is what was mirrored:.


There are a lot of boats along the Tevere, and although they all look the same, they are not. On closer inspection, each one has a special feature that makes it unique.

So, if you are in Rome for a few days, you should definitely spend a few hours on the banks. There are plenty of interesting things to photograph and no ‘selfie locusts’ devastating the land.

At least not yet.

And now, the tech-talk.

Few things in the world are as subjective as opinions about lenses. That said, I really like the Cosina… sorry, Voigtländer Nokton 35/1.4. And when I say I like it, I mean it in absolute terms and not, as is often the case when such lenses are compared to their Leica equivalents, because despite their very low cost, they are just ‘good enough’. For me, the pictures are just as good with an analogue camera as they are with a digital one.

I digitised the film with my DSLR scanning rig (a Pentax K-1 mark II and a Pentax FA 100/2.8 macro), post-processed the DNGs with Darktable’s Negadoctor and finished the job with Pixelmator Pro.

A few pictures are underxposed and a bit murky, howver, despite its age, the expired roll of Portra delivered decent quality results and preserved the distinctive character of this particular film.

Now that I have switched back to a dedicated scanner (the Nikon LS4000), I have to say that the colour reproduction on the latter is better than on the DSLR.

Share this post:

Find more similar content on 35mmc

Use the tags below to search for more posts on related topics:

Contribute to 35mmc for an ad-free experience.

There are two ways to contribute to 35mmc and experience it without the adverts:

Paid Subscription – £2.99 per month and you’ll never see an advert again! (Free 3-day trial).

Subscribe here.

Content contributor – become a part of the world’s biggest film and alternative photography community blog. All our Contributors have an ad-free experience for life.

Sign up here.

About The Author

By Andrea Monti
My name is Andrea Monti. I’m an Italian free-lance journalist, photographer and – in my spare time – an hi-tech lawyer. The works I am more proud of are covering live jazz, pop and rock concerts for an Italian online music magazine and Opera and prose for a 200 years-old theatre. I also do sport photography mainly in athletics and fighting disciplines. You may find out more about me on https://andrea.monti.photography
View Profile

Comments

Tony Warren on 5 frames with a Voigtländer Bessa R2, a Nokton 35/1,4 and a roll of an expired Kodak Portra 160

Comment posted: 20/06/2024

Nice story Andrea and a bit of Rome rarely seen. Is the Tevere what I would know as the Tiber? I haven't heard the name before. The shot with the "digital screen" reflection is interesting. The reflective surface must have boosted the exposure in that area which is better exposure wise. Thanks for the article.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Andrea Monti replied:

Comment posted: 20/06/2024

Thanks Tony. Tevere is the Italian name of the river, although Tiber - as it is called in English - is actually the original Latin name.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Jay Dann Walker on 5 frames with a Voigtländer Bessa R2, a Nokton 35/1,4 and a roll of an expired Kodak Portra 160

Comment posted: 21/06/2024

A few stray thoughts here.

I've never used a Bessa R2. In fact I don't think I ever even seen one. But I find it amazing how much is looks like my Contax G1. It could (almost) be a clone of the Contax. Or the Conax a clone of the Bessa. The G1 dates to 1994. How old is the Bessa? Curious.

As for the lens, the Voigtlander 35/1.4 could also be a clone (again, almost) of my Planar 35/2.0. Both lenses were made by Cosina. Of the pair, I would say the Voigtlander probably outranks the Zeiss by - what? Two-thirds of a stop.

Hair splitting done with, Andrea yours are truly beautiful images made with the Bessa. I see a certain 'creamy' look I recognize from my Planar 35 and the 28 Biogon 28/2.8 which lives on my G1.

As for your text, well, to me it is nothing short of poetic. Well done! Many (too many) years ago, I spent an enchanting half day exploring the Tevere, not with the Contax - my one and only visit to Rome predated the 2-3 years the G1 was manufactured - but with a Nikkormat and, again by coincidence, a Nikon 35/2.0. I can no longer find the negatives I made with this combo. I hope I still have them as at my age now I will most likely never return to Italy again. A lifetime is so short for all the travel one should really do. So my loss entirely.

Many thanks for the happy memories of a long ago visit. Also the interesting information on a (to me) entirely new camera.

Best, DANN
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Andrea Monti replied:

Comment posted: 21/06/2024

Hi Dann, The R2 was made between 2002 and 2004. Before the Nokton, I had the two "classic" Zeiss (Cosina, actually): 50 1/4 and 35/2,8. I suppose that they are the same that yours, only with a different mount. Great lenses, indeed. And, finally, I'm happy to have brought back fond memories...

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Dan Castelli on 5 frames with a Voigtländer Bessa R2, a Nokton 35/1,4 and a roll of an expired Kodak Portra 160

Comment posted: 21/06/2024

I like the demarcation lines where water meet land. That narrow area is unique. I am fascinated by your photos. A barge of chairs? Why not.
I had the 35mm f/1.4 Nokton lens. One day, just shooting, the innards of the lens turned to mush. The aperture ring loosened up & wobbled, I was unable to focus, etc. Still under warranty, it was sent to Japan for repair. I didn't get the lens back for eight months. When I used it after the repair, it was soft (a misaligned element). After another lengthy repair, I got it back and sold it at a loss. It's been replaced with the Ultron 35mm f/20 lens. Any manufacturer can let a bad lens slip under the radar, I just happen to get one.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Andrea Monti replied:

Comment posted: 21/06/2024

Thanks Dan, To be honest, I own(ed) several Cosina made Zeiss and Voigtländer lenses (ZM35 and 50, Voigtländer 35 Asph, 75/1,8 and never had a single issue. Bad luck happen...

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *