A New Year’s Resolution: One Camera for 2025

By David Pauley

For the New Year, I am plotting a significant shift in my approach to film photography. Rather than moving from camera to camera, pivoting from 35mm to medium format or even 4×5″ from one day to the next, I’m planning to make a commitment to one camera — just one! — for 2025.

Before revealing, in a future post, which camera I’ll be using for the next 12 months, I must take an honest look at why this new year’s resolution makes me uneasy. Like some other photographers who’ve rediscovered the medium over the past decade, my return to film came in middle age, a dangerous epoch when a somewhat higher disposable income, a nostalgia for things past and creeping intimations of mortality can combine to produce significant, at times comical, material excesses.

Moving back into photography and to the darkroom in 2019, my desire to make and develop my own photos after decades away ran headlong into the maw of the internet. Of special note is the inescapable online auction site (you know the one), where I’ve acquired, sold and repurchased a near-warehouse full of gear, becoming in the process a reluctant poster child for the previously unfamiliar (to me) mania known as Gear Acquisition Syndrome. While I avoid most social media, an equally impactful force has been YouTube, where a phalanx of film photography “influencers” — some encouraged by camera retailers; many young enough to be my children — wax rhapsodically about their favorite vintage cameras, lenses, films, techniques and accessories (in the process sharing photos that are often lovely, at times inspiring).

To say that my six recent years of shooting film have been only “about gear” would be an overstatement (at least so I hope). Yet still, there’s the palpable sense of anxiety that settles in my gut whenever I contemplate selecting just one camera from my collection to use on every occasion over the next twelve months.

It’s not the kind of dilemma that plagues most professionals.

My friend Lloyd Wolf, a 50-year photographic veteran who long ago made the transition from film to digital, rarely thinks about alternative items of kit, so immersed is he in meeting his own high standards, satisfying his clients and moving onto the next project. (On aesthetic grounds, Lloyd did return to film some years back, dusting off his Mamiya C330 for an award-winning project on Holocaust survivor couples. He told me that he felt that a film TLR might be more familiar and reassuring to his subjects than his bulky digital camera).

As a dedicated amateur, I have not been forced by a daily photography workflow to trim my gear into a coherent package, or indeed to define what my preferred subject matter (or “artistic vision,” if indeed I possess such a thing) might be. Family photos, landscapes, portraiture, travel: I’ve done ’em all, with varying degrees of success (and many, many screw-ups).

Among my favorite images from the last six years are the following:

Sonia teaches Grandma to crochet, 2021. Graflex Speed Graphic with Kodak Aero Ektar 178mm F2.5; CatLabs 4×5 sheet film, ISO 80.
Kissing Couple, Paris, 2022. Tele-Rolleiflex Sonnar f4. Tri-X 400.
Girls at play during a Holy Week procession, Seville, 2019. Leica M6, Minolta M-Rokkor 40mm f2 Ilford HP5 400.
Street Portrait, Mumbai, 2023. Rolleiflex 2.8F, Planar f2.8. Kodak Portra 400.
Janivara Ceremony, Bangalore, 2023. Leica M3, Leitz Summaron 35mm f2.8.
Rajiv, Brooklyn, 2024. Rolleiflex 3.5F, Planar; Kodak Tri-X 400.

If there’s a common aesthetic thread uniting these images, taken in varied locations on six different cameras, I’ve yet to find it. Yet the experience of making them was in some ways similar: I felt that gear was for once subordinate to something larger, each camera a mere framing device that helped me lift a moment from everyday life and make it a tangible object worthy of future reflection. This is, I suppose, a succinct, if somewhat pretentious, expression of what most photographers aspire to: a kind of Platonic ideal striven toward yet seldom reached.

While the cameras do play a part in the look of each of these compositions (could I have gotten such a shallow depth of field on Grandma’s hands with a different bit of kit?), at present my profusion of gear feels less boon than burden. Like a tennis player who changes racquets after every lost point, I have taken to switching from one camera to the next each time I am disappointed with the results of a shoot. This gear preoccupation has kept me from delving more deeply into other matters — banter with subjects, choices of light, film, framing — that almost every writer of note agrees are key to deepening one’s photography.

Being less of a midlife “spoiled brat” — setting aside gear-obsession; focusing on technique; learning from failure — are what’s leading me to shelve most of my cameras and select just one to be my faithful companion for the New Year.

In my next post (later today), I’ll reveal which camera I’ve chosen and what I hope to get from using it in 2025.

Mirror Self-Portrait, Graflex Speed Graphic, Aero-Ektar 178mm f2.5, Ilford FP4 4×5 sheet film, 2019

 

Share this post:

Find more similar content on 35mmc

Use the tags below to search for more posts on related topics:

Contribute to 35mmc for an ad-free experience.

There are two ways to contribute to 35mmc and experience it without the adverts:

Paid Subscription – £2.99 per month and you’ll never see an advert again! (Free 3-day trial).

Subscribe here.

Content contributor – become a part of the world’s biggest film and alternative photography community blog. All our Contributors have an ad-free experience for life.

Sign up here.

About The Author

By David Pauley
I'm a Brooklyn-based photographer and psychoanalyst. My journey with film photography began in middle school in the late 1970s and revived in 2019 when I bought a used film camera and installed a darkroom in my basement. Slowing photography down while embracing the quirks and limitations of this 150+ year old medium have been revelatory to me, changing the way I see the world. Although I do shoot color, my first passion is for black and white photography and darkroom printing. For 2025 I've decided to use just one film camera to document the year. You can reach me at [email protected].
View Profile

Comments

Peter Kay on A New Year’s Resolution: One Camera for 2025

Comment posted: 21/01/2025

that's not fair! I am on tenterhooks now! my film journey is similar. I was loaned a Leica ii at a time when I was 100% digital. that was enough of a hook to teaste the loose thread I didn't know I had. my collection followed one rule, each camera must have a unique characteristic. that way I avoided having duplicates. recently though I have taken a step up in quality (Canon 7, & fully serviced Pentax MX). nothing else comes close to the pleasure of using these two, so I am looking at selling some beauties, purely because they dont currently hit the spot. The trouble is they have little value. for example, my mint Pentax Program A in a leather half case may fetch £40 if I am lucky! I suspect I will just end up strengthening my camera shelf and get into a routine of shutter firing, so as to keep them going. my camera of choice for a full year would probably be the canon 7. I can't wait to hear what you select.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Jonathan Leavitt on A New Year’s Resolution: One Camera for 2025

Comment posted: 21/01/2025

Back when I still used film, I always preferred a waist-level finder because the pictures taken from a lower angle have a stronger sense of perspective. When viewed from eye-level, all the heads in the room line up at the horizon line.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Jeff T. on A New Year’s Resolution: One Camera for 2025

Comment posted: 21/01/2025

Using a single camera will, as you suggest, get you to feel the camera as an extension of your body, to get the camera out of the way, although this feeling would more quickly be achieved with an AF, point-and-shoot camera or as near to that as one could get by keeping one of your cameras at the same setting in a given shooting situation. The disadvantage is that one loses the ability to take advantage of the strengths of the other cameras, lenses, and formats in your gear closet, but having several different machines that require different ways of thinking as well as setting them up for shooting can be a bit confusing, even overwhelming if one is a fortnight or vacation photographer and keeps switching cameras and formats back and forth and doesn't spend enough continuous time with any of them. Good luck with your choice of single camera and your year of getting to know it well. It will be fascinating to read your posts as the year goes by and your conclusions at the end of the year.
As you will have guessed, some, often young, amateur photographers use(d) one camera in the film era out of necessity because that's all they (we) could afford. Back in the day, our small amount of disposable income went to purchase an additional lens for it. And, if we had professional ambitions, after accumulating a few lenses, then an additional body that would mount the lenses, so that at times in certain shoots we'd have two bodies hanging off our necks and shoulders, each with a different focal length lens mounted. I remember when I finally was able to afford a film SLR with a 50mm f/1.8 lens as a grad student in the late 1960s. I spent several months getting used to its possibilities and limitations, especially in low-light photography. My next purchase was a cheap, used, Vivitar wide angle lens, which better enabled indoor photography, and forced me to think more about artificial light. Then I saved for my next purchase, a Vivitar telephoto lens, which was a revelation. In short, even in sticking with a single camera, a new lens opens new possibilities and changes one's relationship to their camera, but it doesn't introduce the kind of confusion that can arise when switching cameras, lenses, and formats.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *