BlackBox Holo review

BlackBox Holo MF and 135 film digitiser – a Review

By Geoff Chaplin

This is a review of the BlackBox Holo MF and 135 film digitiser. If this looks familiar its because I wrote a review of their 35mm film scanner on 23rd May 2024. I found that scanner very useful, fast and far higher quality than my ancient flatbed scanner for 35mm film, so when I started using MF (6×6, 6×7 and 6×9) and started to roam the planet again I decided I wanted a portable digitisation system so immediately looked to blackscalelab’s product.

The scanner is largely 3D printed with many simply interlocking parts. After opening the box and laying the items out I then assembled the scanner without looking at the instructions. That took about 15 minutes. If you’ve played with Lego or a train set then you could the same. If you’ve built self assembly furniture then you could probably put this scanner together with one hand tied behind your back, blindfolded and singing La Marseilles (OK I exaggerate, but its easy). I then scanned a film (12 frames) in about 5 minutes. (My flatbed would take about an hour on 3000dpi.)

Instructions are provided via a QR code taking you to their website. After completion of set-up and scanning a test film I checked the manual to see if I’d missed anything. I hadn’t.

The featured image shows items as taken out of the box:
1. Left hand side: 135, 6×6 and 6×9 masks, and lens to BlackBox step-up rings
2. Middle column: base plate to hold light source and bolts, lens to tube housing, light box, QR code
3. Right hand side: tube rings

The following image shows my macro lens (Sigma 105mm) with step up rings attached to the 82mm of the BlackBox lens housing.

BlackBox Holo review
Macro lens and attached rings

The following shows the light source (now largely invisible apart from the cable and the white of the light panel) inserted in the holder and the 6×6 mask attached by the chromed bolts. Note that there is only one orientation of the mask that fits.

BlackBox Holo review
BlackBox base assembled

Selecting which tubes to use is a matter of trial and error, aiming to get the focussed image of the film to fill the frame as much as possible. Note that one set of tubes works for both MF masks.

BlackBox Holo review
BlackBox Holo base and tbes attached

Attaching the camera to the BlackBox unit is simply a matter of aligning the film with the camera sensor by rotating the camera. Once set the ring can now be locked with the chromed bolt to avoid accidentally rotating the camera during operation. The film holder of the 135 black box unit has been dispensed with – film now simply slides into the mask and is held in precisely the right position by the mask – no twisting of the orientation takes place changing from one frame to another of from one piece of film to another.

BlackBox Holo review
BlackBox Holo ready to go!

In use I set the aperture to f5.6, focus, check the histogram and set shutter speed, set shutter delay to 5 seconds and fire. Incidentally if you want to scan 6×7 then use the 6×9 mask and simply crop further in post.

Image quality

My flatbed scanner working at 3000dpi produces 13.5mpxl of data from a 35mm negative whereas the film may have (say) 40mpxl of data recorded – I expected and got a significant improvement by using the BlackBox unit rather than my scanner. Raising the scanning to 6000dpi makes no practical difference to the image quality even for ultra-high resolution films – it seem that the higher quoted flatbed capabilities are for marketing rather than scanning.

For MF however at 3000dpi a 6×6 negative should produce about 45mpxl of data. My Sony has 42mpxl so I was not expecting any increase in quality. The following images (corresponding to about 40 times magnification on an average portable PC screen – or around 2m square for the full image) compare my flatbed scans to the BlackBox scans. This may say as much about my flatbed as the BlackBox but I was surprised that quality was significantly better with the BlackBox – and I could also clearly see the poorer micro-performance of Foma compared to FP4 (based on a test of only one film of each).

BlackBox Holo review
Flatbed scan 40x crop, FP4
BlackBox Holo review
BlackBox Holo scan 40x crop, FP4
BlackBox Holo review
Flatbed scan 40x crop, Fomapan 100
BlackBox Holo review
BlackBox Holo scan 40x crop, Fomapan 100

Conclusion: the BlackBox Holo MF is a very simple to set up, quick to use, stable and solid, portable and convenient, high quality scans. Read on for details.

A final note: I bought this “scanner” with my own money; I received no discount or inducement of any kind to buy or to write this review.

Share this post:

Find more similar content on 35mmc

Use the tags below to search for more posts on related topics:

Contribute to 35mmc for an ad-free experience.

There are two ways to contribute to 35mmc and experience it without the adverts:

Paid Subscription – £2.99 per month and you’ll never see an advert again! (Free 3-day trial).

Subscribe here.

Content contributor – become a part of the world’s biggest film and alternative photography community blog. All our Contributors have an ad-free experience for life.

Sign up here.

About The Author

By Geoff Chaplin
Primarily a user of Leica film cameras and 8x10 for the past 30 years, recently a mix of film and digital. Interests are concept and series based art work. Professionally trained in astronomical photography, a scientist and mathematician.
View Profile

Comments

Bob Israel on BlackBox Holo MF and 135 film digitiser – a Review

Comment posted: 21/02/2025

I also recently bought the Blackscale Lsb Molo and use it for both 35mm and 6x9 MF. I love that the kit can handle both as opposed to the Valoi which employs separate devices for each format.

I can easily scan a roll of 36 exposures in 1-2 minutes. I’ve also found Dmitry, the Molo creator to be extremely responsive. In fact he worked with me to produce an overlay mask that sits over the 6x9 template for xpan. In my case, it’s a Tex-pan, shooting 35mm in a 6x9 Fuji GW690III.

I highly recommend the Blackscale Molo!
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Gary Smith on BlackBox Holo MF and 135 film digitiser – a Review

Comment posted: 21/02/2025

Thanks for the review Geoff! I'm very happy with my Valoi Easy35 for all of the reasons you state. It is also primarily 3D printed (other than the extension tubes). I wish that I had seem a system that would do MF as well as 35 prior to making my purchase. At the moment I'm mentally assembling a version that will allow me to shoot my 4 x 5 negatives (of which there are none just yet but there will be soon).
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

David Pauley on BlackBox Holo MF and 135 film digitiser – a Review

Comment posted: 21/02/2025

This is a super helpful review, Geoff, thank you! I have been very unhappy with my current scanning set up - a mediocre flatbed scanner and an attachment for my iPhone that doesn't work very well either. I'm very intrigued to hear about this option. I think I may pull the trigger and give it a try! The ability to do both 35 mm and 6 x 6 is a real selling point. Thanks again.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Eric George Rose on BlackBox Holo MF and 135 film digitiser – a Review

Comment posted: 22/02/2025

Cool apparatus! Makes the job easier, faster and with better results than using a flatbed scanner. Personally I use a copy stand, light table (balanced for daylight) and my old Omega enlarger negative holders. I stitch exposures together for anything bigger than MF. The Panasonic FF camera I use can produce 96MB files. The results are outstanding.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *