Creativity vs Originality

By Andrea Monti

Is the photo above creative? Is it original?

Well… yes and no.

It is certainly original because I ‘in person’ took it, and it is creative because – regardless of the aesthetic result – I took the time to arrange all the elements (composition, light, etc.) in a coherent moment —and I have the film negative to prove it.

On the other hand, it is neither original —as in ‘unique’— nor creative because the same photo can be found here and maybe elsewhere on the Internet.

Obviously, the linked photo it is not ‘the’ same as mine, because it is clear that they were taken at different times and places (mine was taken at gate 113, while the one linked, at another gate, has a different light and the latter does not show people). However, they are essentially the ‘same’ picture: same composition, (roughly) same angle of view, same, generally speaking, idea.

This is another example: this photo, taken in Italy, has an almost identical twin in Alabama, USA.

A Beach, late afternoon
Late afternoon on beach on the Italian East Coast

In this picture and its ‘doppelgänger’ there a few difference in terms of focal length, perspective and post-production. However it is out of question that the idea behind the shots was essentially the same.

Berman&Sons builidng at Boston Seaport
Berman&Sons builidng at Boston Seaport – Boston (USA)

So, have I committed an act of plagiarism? Of course not, because I was not even aware of the existence of other similar images, nevertheless, the existence of other similar images deprives mine of its intrinsic photographic sense.

Should I, therefore, refrain from taking this type of picture? Again, the answer is no. In practical terms, I can use my photo as I wish without risking (sometimes ridiculous) copyright claims, and somebody might find interesting the peculiarity of my pictures when compared to others; so even those with reduced originality can retain their dignity and usefulness.

However, I think the main reason why such images are important and one should continue taking them, is that they force the photographer to stay away from the obvious, pushing the eye to look for unusual perspective and composition. i.e. for originality and creativity.

I summed it up in one line: if a shot is too obvious, think twice before taking it.

To this end, I have found that a regular use of Google Lens or Tineye to search for similar, already existing images is very effective.

Share this post:

Find more similar content on 35mmc

Use the tags below to search for more posts on related topics:

Contribute to 35mmc for an ad-free experience.

There are two ways to contribute to 35mmc and experience it without the adverts:

Paid Subscription – £2.99 per month and you’ll never see an advert again! (Free 3-day trial).

Subscribe here.

Content contributor – become a part of the world’s biggest film and alternative photography community blog. All our Contributors have an ad-free experience for life.

Sign up here.

About The Author

By Andrea Monti
My name is Andrea Monti. I’m an Italian free-lance journalist, photographer and – in my spare time – an hi-tech lawyer. The works I am more proud of are covering live jazz, pop and rock concerts for an Italian online music magazine and Opera and prose for a 200 years-old theatre. I also do sport photography mainly in athletics and fighting disciplines. You may find out more about me on https://andrea.monti.photography
View Profile

Comments

Greg on Creativity vs Originality

Comment posted: 22/02/2024

I like the thought exercise, in part because the article did not follow the trail I expected. So props! [rant to follow ;-) ] But I disagree with the conclusion as stated. "if a shot is too obvious, think twice before taking it." Why? One should always take whatever shot one's heart and/or mind has so inclined one. It is neither plagiarism nor theft to look at a beautiful shot from [fill in the blank] and say to one's self, "I would love to see and photograph that." In a lifetime of limited time and resources, one can only see and capture so many things. Whether one uses Google or something else to avoid repetitious imagery, or LocationScout or something similar to capture a "bucket list" image, there is absolutely nothing wrong with hoping to capture something like an Hawaiian lava flow, or Bora Bora lagoon, or the Eiffel Tower, or Pisa or whatever, no matter how "obvious" it is. And if that capture, even duplicative of someone else's image provides food for the soul, then it is all good. Now, if one is seeking commercial use of even the slightest sort, then yes, by all means, one should ask one's self "will this be interesting to my potential customer?" But that's a *business* decision, not a creative one. No one can speak for what is in another human's head or heart. So, I completely disagree that anyone should avoid the obvious, just because it's been done before, *unless* it is one's goal to avoid the obvious. No artist has any obligation to be original or creative in the eye's of anyone else. And even for themselves, they have no more obligation to be so than they require for their own artistic pursuit. I've photographed Mono Lake in California dozens of times, and made thousands of images, many of which appear quite similar. But each one was a different moment, each moment a space in time to experience and remember. As someone long before me said: "I don't travel to take photographs; I take photographs to travel." Experiencing the scene before my eyes is the goal, and photography is one way to experience it.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Andrea Monti replied:

Comment posted: 22/02/2024

Photography is a practice in which the eye must be trained to see what distinguishes a creative photograph from a mere recording of a scene. This is a prerequisite for copyright protection of a photograph under the Berne Convention. Therefore, taking obvious shots can affect the ability to claim legal protection for the image. Moreover, training takes time and it is not efficient to waste it on obvious shots, unless, as I said, they are necessary to build a personal stock for re-use with editorial licences. Of course, it is not my place to tell people what to do with their passion. I am just offering a line of thought, so no need to rant

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ibraar Hussain replied:

Comment posted: 22/02/2024

Is ‘photography’ supposed to be creative? I guess you’re right there as even with snapshots of say a birthday party using a 110 camera in 1981 there has always been the intention of making a nice photo. The effort is always involved to make it look nice and this is creativity.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ibraar Hussain replied:

Comment posted: 22/02/2024

But not necessarily original. Many people want a postcard photo of a scene - say a classic shot of the Eiffel Tower or the pyramids.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

David O. Garcia on Creativity vs Originality

Comment posted: 22/02/2024

For me a photo does not have to be unique or original to be interesting. Sometimes I see photos where the photographer is being too clever to be unique, but it can loose it's meaning. For me a nicely composed and exposed photo will do. I document what I see but I also try to use basic compositional techniques. In the long run my photos are merely records of where I've been. I like what you posted.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ibraar Hussain on Creativity vs Originality

Comment posted: 22/02/2024

Interesting as on Flickr we have below our photos ‘iStock’ - AI selects any photos which are similar to the one you have. I’ve had the most obscure and I thought original photos and there were a few which were similar. Only one or two of mine were truly original without even iStock being able to show anything which resembled mine

I don’t care much about this stuff though. As long as I’m happy as I guess as with many people photography is for my own pleasure
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Geoff Chaplin on Creativity vs Originality

Comment posted: 22/02/2024

Very entertaining! Is it original is a question pervading all the arts and the sciences: Einstein and Minkowski understood 4 dimensional space-time independently; Newton and Leibniz created calculus independently. It is truly rare to have an original thought, create an original photographic idea, or write an entirely original work. But who cares? Self expression is important even if not original or totally creative; incremental development is what most of us do. If you are talking about commercial aspects of photography then maybe the rules of the game are different.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Nik Stanbridge on Creativity vs Originality

Comment posted: 23/02/2024

Photographing the vernacular is actually quite hard to do simply because of its typically and perhaps inherently ordinary nature. Is a vernacular photograph fine art? Maybe not today it isn’t but tomorrow it will be perhaps. It is truly fascinating to look at, say, Stephen Shore’s vernacular work today; looking at the scene, the cars, the shops, the clothes, the food, the… everything. It took great vision to take such ‘ordinary’ photographs at the time, especially with a view camera.

I try, sometimes, to take those ordinary vernacular images today but it’s always a mental struggle given the apparent dull and routine nature of today’s cars, shops, clothes… in twenty years time though, these will be so interesting. As interesting as a Shore or a Walker Evans perhaps.

I think photographing the obvious is the hardest photography of all.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Dave Powell on Creativity vs Originality

Comment posted: 23/02/2024

An interesting topic, Andrea! And when Greg quoted "I don't travel to take photographs; I take photographs to travel," it reminded me that common travel snaps have often refreshed memories of where Kate and I have been... and in some cases, also revealed things that, at the time, only the camera noticed! But when I taught photography, I offered a tip for getting somewhat unique images: "When the urge comes to raise a camera to your eye, first ask yourself what about the scene is attracting your attention. Then do whatever you can to emphasize that aspect in the photo." We'd then go out and shoot the town common. It was lovely how things changed when they tried that!
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Graham Orbell on Creativity vs Originality

Comment posted: 24/02/2024

An interesting topic Andrea. About 4 years ago I was wandering along a popular mountain trail in a New Zealand National Park. About 20 metres off the trail I spotted a pool with New Zealand’s highest mountain Mount Cook ( 12,000’) reflected in it. I wandered alone over rocks and boulders with my Canon DSLR and 24 mm lens trying to find the best angle. Crouched low down framing my original image, I suddenly found I was surrounded by an increasing small crowd of selfie takers and others crouching beside me. P off I thought. They hadn’t seen what I’d seen until they spotted me trying to take my original photo which was no longer original.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Gary Smith on Creativity vs Originality

Comment posted: 26/02/2024

I suppose the issue becomes: What do you plan to do with the photo?

Are you planning to sell it? Are you planning to enter it into a competition?

If all you are planning to do is enlarge it and hang it on your wall, I don't think it matters if you thought long and hard about the originality or creativity involved.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *