Canon 110ED

Canon 110 ED Review

By Tony Warren

I am able to get to know this well specified Canon 110 ED camera and the Minox 110S I wrote about recently thanks to Bob Janes’ generous gift. Bob has posted several informative articles on this 16mm format that are a mine of information and which have been very useful along the way as I have explored these intriguing little cameras.

The Canon 110ED
The Canon 110ED

The camera

Introduced in 1975, the 110 ED was aimed at discerning photographers who required better quality results from this new system than most early 110s offered, being basically designed as they were for point and shoot use requiring little or no photographic knowledge. Most manufacturers did, however, produce some advanced models for this segment of the market once it took hold, Kodak included.

The camera is designed around a high quality, 5-element, f2 lens with rangefinder focus and aperture priority exposure control with an optional date imprinting feature. The whole is enclosed in a quite heavy, solidly made body with controls well placed for easy operation taking the easy loading 110 cartridges. A sliding, two part cover protects the lens, finder and meter cell and must be fully open before the camera will operate.

Film speed is communicated automatically with the camera in Kodak’s system using a long or short ridge on the end of the cartridge. The ridge presses down a sensing lever or pad for slow film or leaves it untouched for fast. On the simplest models this alters the aperture set by any aperture or weather symbol selections offered or the exposure meter if one is fitted.

On its introduction Kodak offered ISO 80 monochrome and ISO 200 colour negative films. Other manufacturers set their film speeds to varying though similar values. In Canon’s case, they rather pragmatically took the easy way out with the 110 ED and didn’t include a sensor at all setting the film speed to ISO 100 whatever film is inserted. A logical solution from a commercial point of view, avoiding the expense and complication of variable film speeds. At the time, it would be a fairly safe arrangement, close to the ideal for monochrome and well within the latitude of the colour negative film most would be using. The Canon 110 ED 20 would have to be introduced later with variable film speed settings when ISO 400 films came on the scene.

Control panel with excellent arrangement and identification of controls.
Control panel with excellent arrangement and identification of controls.

Controls are grouped in a panel that falls naturally under the right fingers with film advance under the right thumb so no change in grip is needed at any point in normal use. The panel contains sliders for focus and aperture, plus the shutter release with a cable release socket alongside. The focus slider is ridged and the exposure slider smooth but click-stopped so both can be identified by touch with the cameras at the eye. A nice design touch.

Back open showing battery at left and film chamber lacking a film speed sensor.
Back open showing battery at left and film chamber lacking a film speed sensor.

The film door is released with a latch and opens to expose the film chamber, large rear element of the f2 lens and the battery chamber. The battery is a modern, readily obtainable 6v cell housed under a cap which if removed, should the battery die, allows the shutter to operate manually at a fixed 1/125 sec. To remove the battery mid-film, however, would mean the loss of some frames when opening the film chamber door. The film door has no conventional hinges and relies on a full length flexible plastic connection. This works well, if a little stiffly and shows no sign of fatigue in the plastic.

The viewfinder has a suspended frame with parallax markings and warning lights for over or under exposure on either side of the frame lines.

There is a hot shoe for a dedicated flash on the top plate and a tripod thread on the base.

Date setting controls and indicators. Battery check at right.
Date setting controls and indicators. Battery check at right.

As mentioned, a date imprinting feature is provided, set with wheels in a panel on the left hand end of the body. Any date set is shown on the top plate and also in the finder when the release is pressed or it can be set to blank. Since the years only go from 78 to 88 it has limited value now. Single digits from 0-9 can be set to indicate the year within a decade.

A battery check is provided in the same panel as the date setting controls.

Film gate detail showing spacing and cartridge semsors.
Film gate detail showing spacing and cartridge semsors.

There is a recessed lever located below the bottom edge of the film gate that senses if a cartridge is loaded. This is linked to the shutter and, if the sensor pin in the edge of the film gate has not risen into a film perforation but the cartridge sensor is depressed it will block the shutter release. This will be to prevent premature shutter release and ensure framing lines up with the preprinted frames on 110 film in combination with the sprocket holes.

In Use

One of the standout features of these little cameras for me is the ergonomics. Just as with some TLRs I get frustrated if handling gets in the way of taking photographs. 110 designs generally let you use one grip to shoot, wind on and carry out any other operation allowed for and this model is no exception, e.g. the design of the focus and aperture controls as mentioned.

Notch in side of cartridge and sensor visible below film gate.
Notch in side of cartridge and sensor visible below film gate.

When using unperforated film stripped from larger format rolls the cartridge presence sensor mentioned above has to be bypassed to allow the shutter to fire for some reason even though the spacing pin is always depressed. This is done by cutting a notch out of the cartridge so the sensor is not depressed and while framing is not controlled, one stroke of the advance slider moves the film far enough to avoid any overlap and cocks the shutter which can then be fired. 20 rather than 24 exposures are usually possible.

Shooting is then very straightforward. A black spot has been added to the finder at some time which is visible in the rangefinder square in the finder but doesn’t hinder things and was originally intended to boost the contrast of the rangefinder I gather. Alignment of the eye through the finder seems more important, especially wearing glasses when the eye is further away. I can just see the whole of the frame wearing glasses but not the warning lights.

Results

The first film I put through was a strip from a roll of 120 size Fomapan 400, rated at ISO 100 and processed in 1:50 Rodinal for 7 minutes as recommended by the Massive Development Chart web site (https://www.digitaltruth.com/devchart.php). The film was loaded in a recycled cartridge I was trying out to mimic the method used to load the earlier 16mm cassette, a variation on Bob Janes improved modifications in line with his article. It showed a few light leaks which I tracked down to the frame numbering window letting light strike the joint in the cartridge top, but only in some cases. The solution will be to cover the cartridge window when using unperforated film. Otherwise, the cartridge worked well and was easy to load, as hoped.

Modified cartridge used - allows film to be loaded into left hand drum and lid put on to complete the rest in the light in the same way as the old 16mm cassette.
Modified cartridge used – allows film to be loaded into left hand drum and lid put on to complete the rest in the light in the same way as the old 16mm cassette.

The camera gives an image of 19mm x 13.5mm with strip film loads compared to the commercial image size of 17mm x 13mm showing a little vignetting at the longest distance settings which disappears at any closer setting. I was very impressed with both the quality of the images and the performance of the lens and the exposure meter, which handled some pretty difficult lighting situations surprisingly well. These are a few of the results from that film.

Dunedin's war memorial.
Dunedin’s war memorial.
Victorian bronze and Cenotaph.
Victorian bronze and Cenotaph.
Cenotaph contre jour - lens handles flair really well.
Cenotaph contre jour – lens handles flair really well.
Excellent contrast and detail.
Excellent contrast and detail.
This might give a modern meter problems.
This might give a modern meter problems.

For its second outing, I used Rollei 80S stripped from a 120 roll and loaded into a similar recycled cartridge, taping over the numbering window this time. Processing was at box speed in Rodinal 1:50 and timed following Rollei’s instructions.

Detail

Detail of entrance arch - Dunedin's Chinese Gardens. Slight vignette visible.
Detail of entrance arch – Dunedin’s Chinese Gardens. Slight vignette visible.
Restored early building.
Restored early building.
Detail capture is very good but even the fine grain has just obscured the car's number plate.
Detail capture is very good but even the fine grain has just obscured the car’s number plate.
Differential focus is possible but only at close distances.
Differential focus is possible but only at close distances.
Waiting for the car wash - the best camera etc...
Waiting for the car wash – the best camera etc…
Gnarly old tree in Dunedin's Botanic Gardens.
Gnarly old tree in Dunedin’s Botanic Gardens.

Last words

I hope the examples will speak for themselves with sharp, detailed images taking full advantage of the high performance of the films used. Having used a selection of high end 110 models now, I am impressed by what was produced 50 years ago and by how good modern emulsions have become.

Share this post:

Find more similar content on 35mmc

Use the tags below to search for more posts on related topics:

Contribute to 35mmc for an ad-free experience.

There are two ways to contribute to 35mmc and experience it without the adverts:

Paid Subscription – £2.99 per month and you’ll never see an advert again! (Free 3-day trial).

Subscribe here.

Content contributor – become a part of the world’s biggest film and alternative photography community blog. All our Contributors have an ad-free experience for life.

Sign up here.

About The Author

By Tony Warren
In my 60 or so years of serious involvement in photography I have seen the demise of the viewfinder, the rise of the SLR and the eclipse of them all with the meteoric development of the digital camera. Through it all, however, and above all else, the image is what it is all about so I now use film alongside digital. Whatever is the most appropriate or practical. My contributions will hopefully be useful for anyone interested in using film and also how a died-in-the-wool antique like me is continuing his life-long addiction in the digital age, using both platforms. The major benefit of an extended retirement is that I can spend most of my time nowadays with photography and writing about it.
View Profile

Comments

Gary Smith on Canon 110 ED Review

Comment posted: 23/10/2024

For your next assignment: produce 2 prints using the collodion wet plate process.

Ought to be more of a challenge than fooling around with 110.

Nice example shots. Seems like work loading a jiggered cartridge.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Tony Warren replied:

Comment posted: 23/10/2024

If I still had my darkroom that is probably just what I would be doing Gary or something similar. I am almost at the end of my investigation and immersion into 110 though. I have settled on a simple cartridge modification that will be revealed shortly in a summary article. The real challenge that gives me satisfaction however is to produce the shots you kindly comment on so favourably.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Alexander Seidler on Canon 110 ED Review

Comment posted: 24/10/2024

Great results tony !
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Tony Warren replied:

Comment posted: 24/10/2024

Thanks Alexander.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Julian Tanase on Canon 110 ED Review

Comment posted: 24/10/2024

Good insight on this camera, which in the early 90s escaped my Minox and16mm/110 GAS. I always wanted it, and when it was available I was (alas) well past 110 photography. Well, this and the Minolta 110 Zoom.

I like and applaud your research into these cameras, Tony; I know it to be a seldom rewarding thing. But when you get there with good results, it is a good feeling, right? Good looking photographs as well, I like these, esp. the Dunedin one.

All the best !
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Tony Warren replied:

Comment posted: 24/10/2024

Thank you for that Julian. I do enjoy experiencing these varied cameras that digital has now brought within my budget. This one was gifted to me by Bob Janes who tells me he is happy to see it appreciated. I am working on a lens comparison at present but if you would like give this a try I will happily pass it on once that is done. Let me know if you fancy a return to 110.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *