5 frames Rediscovering my Pentax 67… and then another 5…

By John Duder

I bought a 6×7, the slightly earlier model, around 1989: it was stolen in 1992, and the replacement is the less stylishly-named 67. It’s been sitting on the shelf for some time, and the fact that I’ve recently bought some 120 film prompted me to get it down and use it.

It’s not a rapid camera in use: although it’s a Spotmatic on steroids while shooting, there are only 10 frames on each roll of film, and it doesn’t have interchangeable backs, unlike many of the rivals. It’s a matter of being organised, and following the procedure. I realised, some years ago, that professionals cheated, by having duplicate bodies and lenses, and a team changing films as fast as they can go behind the scenes.

Focus is tricky – the screen is quite dim, and I now, with ageing eyesight, regret not buying a Beattie screen when they were advertised regularly… I love microprisms, but the standard screen’s not very bright, and the light levels in a studio don’t favour manual focus of any kind – especially in studios with recent flash units that have LED modelling lamps!

Model Kirsty May at ARB. 

To be entirely honest, my very first outing with the big beast was for an art nude shoot, but the focus accuracy was embarrassing, and not everybody loves nudes, so a couple of films went with me to the ARB Studios social in Longton, Stoke-on-Trent. I took the body with the standard 105mm f/2.4 lens, and the 165mm f/2.8 that works so well for portraits. Both are old: the camera line was manufactured from 1969 up until digital was killing off all the best kit, and the lenses were restyled a couple of times. I’ve not met a lens that isn’t beautifully sharp, though.

Chris Harvey at the ARB social evening.

Using a Pentax 67 in a modern studio isn’t easy: current flash triggers go in hot shoes (which the Pentax doesn’t have), and it’s difficult to switch on the IR sensor on most of the current generation of flash units! Sarah (I have the PC lead for my Prolinca IR trigger permanently plugged into the flash synch socket of the 67.)

Sarah Ayton at the social evening.

Nonetheless, with a little persistence, I found that I was able to shoot, confining myself to two frames of each subject: film is getting more costly by the month.

The ‘broomhandle’ was a really worthwhile accessory, as was a focus ring – these are now incredibly expensive second-hand, but they make focussing and holding the camera steady vastly easier.

I chose the big Pentax around 35 years back, as being the most wieldy of the medium-format cameras: and every time I hang up another reel of film, I love it more for the sheer quality – and these days, it’s a rather cool camera to be seen using! .

Image of LEnza and Beth Kate at AURAphotographic

Share this post:

Find more similar content on 35mmc

Use the tags below to search for more posts on related topics:

Contribute to 35mmc for an ad-free experience.

There are two ways to contribute to 35mmc and experience it without the adverts:

Paid Subscription – £2.99 per month and you’ll never see an advert again! (Free 3-day trial).

Subscribe here.

Content contributor – become a part of the world’s biggest film and alternative photography community blog. All our Contributors have an ad-free experience for life.

Sign up here.

About The Author

Comments

Art Meripol on 5 frames Rediscovering my Pentax 67… and then another 5…

Comment posted: 25/10/2024

I joined a 'shelter' magazine staff in 1989 and was handed two Pentax 6X7 bodies and a variety of lenses. It was a loud clunky camera but with the 75mm Shift lens it produced amazing and beautiful chromes doing interiors. And yes those lenses were brilliantly sharp. I wish I still had them.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

John Duder replied:

Comment posted: 25/10/2024

I'm glad that this reawakened some happy memories...

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Gary Smith on 5 frames Rediscovering my Pentax 67… and then another 5…

Comment posted: 25/10/2024

Hi John,
This is my third attempt at a reply.
I understand about the eyesight business. I thought using a waist-level finder on my Mamiya 645 would be the cat's pajamas. It wasn't. Maybe I need to carry an auxiliary magnifying glass? Did you also shoot 35mm back in the day or were you always shooting 120? What do you shoot most now? Of my two 120 film cameras I prefer the 6 x 6 Perkeo 2 folder. It's not as massive as the Mamiya (or I suspect your 6 x 7). Love your example images - what film stock were you shooting?

Thanks for the article.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

John Duder replied:

Comment posted: 25/10/2024

Hi, Gary - I wonder if the answer is to use glasses? If your eyesight is imperfect, that may help - viewfinders tend to be set to place the screen at a distance that those with normal sight, or mild short sight, can see really well - and the same will go for the magnifiers on wait-level finders, I expect. I used 35mm before I got the big Pentax, and still love my Contax RTS above all other cameras, for handling. (Do I need to write that up, perhaps?) The film used for the images above was Fomapan 100, from my local stockist of all things film and darkroom, Ag Photographic. It's never going to replace FP4+ as best all-rounder, but I hope to nail how to process it by the time I've used the ten rolls I bought!

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

christian thompson on 5 frames Rediscovering my Pentax 67… and then another 5…

Comment posted: 28/10/2024

Yes, back in the 80's and nineties i had an assistant changing cameras and backs.
But the problem with the Pentax was the mirror slap.
Shooting fashion on a tripod was better with the mamiya RB, and shooting the P67 with the mirror locked up was no good at all. So P67 was a street action style camera better suited to still life? Again, the RB was 10 times better.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

John Duder replied:

Comment posted: 28/10/2024

I've used an RB67, and it's incredibly strongly made: but it should have a Benbo welded to the base, because it's too big and heavy for most people to use without a tripod... Sheer mass will obviously damp any mirror issues: but I simply love the fact that the 67 handles like a Spotmatic on steroids, and that sold it to me.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Jeffery Luhn on 5 frames Rediscovering my Pentax 67… and then another 5…

Comment posted: 28/10/2024

John,
Interesting photos! Even on a cell phone I can see the sharpness.
Back in the mid-nineties a friend of mine challenged me to run a sharpness test with his Pentax 6x7 and my Hasselblad. Tripod, mirror locked up, cable release, lens chart, etc. It was a 100% tie in every category....except the 6x7 fit the 8x10 print size better than 6x6!!! So in that respect, Pentax won by a silver halide! I borrowed his system several times and found it loud and hard to focus in dim light. I owned an RB 67 system too, for studio head shots. It is near impossible to use handheld. I finally sold it last year after decades on the shelf. Now I own a Pentax 645n. Wow! It does everything!
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

John Duder replied:

Comment posted: 28/10/2024

I chose my 67 after looking at all the competition - I know it didn't fit everyone's needs. We all have our own loves, and handling preferences. Many tradeoffs between the 67 and my current Alpha 7R IV: and there's room in my heart for both of them...

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Jeffery Luhn replied:

Comment posted: 28/10/2024

So very true!

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Graham Line on 5 frames Rediscovering my Pentax 67… and then another 5…

Comment posted: 01/11/2024

Knew a pro who did use his RB67 handheld quite often, but he was 6'4", built like the Forth Bridge, and his hands were the size of baseball gloves.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

John Duder replied:

Comment posted: 01/11/2024

There was a British glamour photographer who swore by the Mamiyas - he, too, had hands like a gorilla. My hands are not terribly large for my height, and my fingers are neither broad nor strong. I love the Pentax!

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *