5 Frames with a Vivitar 70-210 f/3.5

By Sebastian Shields

Cheap zoom lenses have never had a great reputation. Especially in the Digital age, some budget zooms are considered a bit of a plague. Cheap, plasticky, and very poor optically. To many, a budget zoom is a small step above the kit lens and is forgotten from your kit similarly quickly. Given that reputation, many old, film-era zooms can be found for next to nothing. With this stated, it’s important to be clear that not all cheap lenses were originally budget lenses, especially some of these film era telephotos. In my case, I acquired, admittedly accidentally, a Vivitar Series 1 70-210 f3.5. I got the lens included with a K1000 and a few other lenses. The Vivitar Series 1 lenses were meant to be Vivitar’s premium lens offering, but due to the lack of a real market for older manual-focus zooms, have dropped to rock bottom prices. The stats of the lens reflect its position as being more premium. You may have noticed the constant f/3.5 aperture, or the all metal build to boot. This is where the difference between a lens that is now cheap, and an originally cheap lens is noticeable.

Pentax K1000, Vivitar 70-210 f/3.5, HP5 @1600

My copy is a circa 1981 example made by Tokina, discernible by the 37xxxx serial number as Vivitar sold a variety of lenses from other manufacturers. The differences between the various Vivitar 70-210 lenses are fairly easy to differentiate using the resources on PentaxForums. When I first got the lens, I didn’t do any of this research and was initially very skeptical. Nonetheless, I decided to try the lens out periodically as well as a no-name brand 2x teleconverter it came with. While I knew this teleconverter was never going to be an immaculately positive experience, the lens itself was actually quite a gem. It is surprisingly sharp, even wide open, and turns smoothly throughout the whole range. Also, while not really a macro lens as it may claim, the 1:4 reproduction is still relatively close, and pretty fun to work with.

Pentax K1000, Vivitar 70-210 f/3.5, Delta 3200

After not using the lens for several months, I decided to take it back out recently for a hike with my campus’s photography club, also bringing a 19mm f/3.8 Vivitar Lens. Having two ends of either extreme for focal lengths, (for a photographer that is used to the 28-50 range,) was a struggle, but nonetheless a fun creative challenge. The ultrawide 19mm allowed much more creative use of foreground and leading lines while the 70-210 made me hone in more tightly on scenes and shapes down below.

Pentax K1000, Vivitar 70-210 f/3.5, Gold 200

As you can see, the lens does have slight flaring shooting towards the sun, but it really isn’t bad at all, especially for such an older optic. I’m not going to lie, focusing was not always ideal with the push-pull zoom as while the lens as a whole is fairly well damped, the focusing ring can leave a little to the imagination, especially when trying to maintain your focal length. I will say, at the same size as my Canon EF 200mm 2.8 prime lens, the half-ish stop slower 70-210 was much less of a nuisance to carry than a larger, more modern, and autofocus lens of similar specs.

Pentax K1000, Vivitar 70-210 f/3.5, Gold 200

Overall, while not a lens I’ll ever use in my day to day, it is great for the occasional experimenting or scenic view overlook. It’s also not a lens I feel bad about owning as there really is no reason not to own it. It’s sharp, fairly small for what it is, and I couldn’t sell it for much more than pennies even if I wanted to. It’s also plenty of fun for when I do decide to lug it around.

Pentax K1000, Vivitar 70-210 f/3.5, Gold 200

If you want to check out more of my photography, check out my Instagram!

Share this post:

Find more similar content on 35mmc

Use the tags below to search for more posts on related topics:

Contribute to 35mmc for an ad-free experience.

There are two ways to contribute to 35mmc and experience it without the adverts:

Paid Subscription – £2.99 per month and you’ll never see an advert again! (Free 3-day trial).

Subscribe here.

Content contributor – become a part of the world’s biggest film and alternative photography community blog. All our Contributors have an ad-free experience for life.

Sign up here.

About The Author

By Sebastian Shields
Photographer out of Maine, Currently in Virginia studying Industrial Design.
View Profile

Comments

Jeffery Luhn on 5 Frames with a Vivitar 70-210 f/3.5

Comment posted: 25/11/2024

Sebastian,
Hmmm, I bought that Vivitar zoom for my Nikon when it first came out and abandoned it in favor of primes. I have a few of them now, because they've been donated to the school. I'll shot a lens chart and see if they are worth using. Thanks for sharing.
Jeffery
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Steviemac on 5 Frames with a Vivitar 70-210 f/3.5

Comment posted: 26/11/2024

Good for you Sebastian, well done for speaking up for the unfashionable. I love the fact that cheap zooms are just that, namely cheap. The obsession with highly priced primes means that great glass is available for very little money, and as you show, many of these zooms are actually very good. The advantage of primes is that they are usually better when shot at wider apertures. I've had more than acceptable results from the likes of Tamron, Tokina and Soligor. Stop the cheaper lenses down, and they're great.

I'd also add the unloved 135mm and 200mm primes made by companies other than Nikon, Pentax, Canon et al. A particular favourite is a 135mm f2.8 by Hanimex which is ok wide open, good by f4 and excellent at f8. It cost me around £8 a year ago.


Unless the aim is to produce professional images suitable for print publication, most would be hard pressed to really notice the difference, and who wants to be continually enlarging an image in an attempt to discover it's flaws? Quite a few people I suppose.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sebastian Shields replied:

Comment posted: 26/11/2024

Definitely agree on your last point on pixel-peeping, or in this case grain-peeping(?) for optical flaws. Plus, it's always more fun to go out without worrying about peak sharpness, or using the best gear, etc!

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Russell Rosener on 5 Frames with a Vivitar 70-210 f/3.5

Comment posted: 28/11/2024

Bravo for getting everyone out of the prime lens cult. Recently I've been assembling a small collection of ultra cheap 1980s zooms that are diamonds in the rough. Mounting some of these on modern DSLR bodies proves they were much better than the average modern kit zoom or even primes.
Hope to see more posts like this soon. I bet this particular zoom is a fantastic portrait lens as well.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sebastian Shields replied:

Comment posted: 28/11/2024

I've seen some oddball 80s and 90s zoom lenses that are much better than most would expect when adapted onto more modern cameras. I've yet to experiment with this lens for portraits but I definitely agree with its potential as it is relatively fast at 200mm!

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *