Olypmus xa2

Olympus XA-2 – An old friend

By Chris Davenport

Years ago (40 years) I moved to the east coast for a couple years. I was loaned a small compact camera. I decided to carry it instead of my heavy bulky Minolta. At first glance it seemed to be a small somewhat inexpensive camera. It was an Olympus XA-2. Wanting to revisit this great little camera. I purchased a new-to-me XA-2 in 2024. It was small, lightweight, very simple, but could this device really turn out good pictures? In short, yes.

The XA-2 came in a nice hard sturdy plastic box. The instruction manual was included but with the ease, minimal buttons, a few dials and adjustments, this camera seemed very intuitive to use. It seemed cheap and plasticky and I was wondering just how well it would shoot compared to the Minoltas and Pentax’s I had carried before. Plus, how well was it going to hold up being in my pockets and bike bags all the time? In the end I was not disappointed with the XA-2 at all.

The little solid camera actually did very well. I shot incredible pictures, and it performed in every environment I was in. It was dependable. I switched between slides and print film depending on my budget. It is a basic point-and-shoot and very user-friendly. Open the clam-shell lens cover, look through the view finder, and push the button. Even if I had forgotten to adjust for distance or landscape focus, the pictures looked good. The latitude in the 6 element lens was good.

Some describe the camera as an ultra compact. I would agree and it was easy to fit in a backpack or coat pocket. The XA-2 has some extras as well. There is a self-timer with a 10 second wait. The same switch is also a battery check.

Slide photo taken in 1984

The Olympus XA series came around 1979. It quickly became a hit in the point-and-shoot field. It’s a 35mm camera with a high-quality lens with minimal requirements from the user, and is easy to carry and use. To focus the XA-2 there is a basic single person symbol, a group symbol and a mountain symbol. That’s it for your focus adjustments. It can be a challenge, but a single person is 3-6 feet. The group setting is 6-12, beyond that use the mountain icon.

ASA is the only other thing to set, and with ASA setting from 25 to 800 you have several film speed options. And with the automatic light meter it gives great shutter speeds to match your lighting needs. A little green or red light on the right, inside the view finder, lets you know if you have enough light.

Slide photo taken in 1983

A 35mm compact camera that’s dependable every time is a lot of fun. The flash is easy as well. Attach and screw the flash to the camera and then turn it on. It extends the camera’s size sideways about 2 inches but is still very compact. I carried that little camera daily. The flash is strong and the pictures came out even in darker circumstances. There seemed to be a bit of vignette around the photo’s edges, but it was hardly noticeable. In fact, I really didn’t notice it in most of my pictures.

Slide photo from 1983.

The Olympus XA-2 model started in 1981 and then later went to the XA-3, and lastly the XA-4. A more simple XA-1 was released at some point too. With its impressive lens design, these little cameras will likely never disappoint the shooter. The images are bright and colorful. This little camera is not a replacement for the larger SLRs, but with good composition and with good contrast, sharp pictures could easily be made into 8x10s and bigger.

Slide photo from 1983

There have been lots of reviews on this XA series. Articles with specs, limits, weight, shutter speed, and who the designer was (Maitani). Since there were 5 versions (the first one was just XA) there were a few changes and advances along the way in its development. Mine was the XA-2 and it was very capable in its ability for my needs. People might argue as to which is the best model, but any XA camera will perform well, even the very basic XA-1.

The price range for used ones today are pretty reasonable for the camera it is. It is not a disposable camera by any means, and if you get a well looked after one, it should rugged enough to give years of service.

Recent photo after new seals were put in and shot with BW film.

Sadly, when I returned from my trip, this little camera companion got turned back over to the landlord who had gotten it for me (Dad). I was recently able to locate another good working XA-2 but it needed new light seals. This isn’t a hard job, but time consuming. It’s now working very well.

I am glad to have this little camera in my camera corral. For just shooting candid and street shots the XA-2 is a very easy choice. It’s an easy choice for simple street and vacation photography. These little XA cameras have made a small niche for themselves. A camera with great six element lens, easy knobs and dials, easy shutter and for giving remarkable pictures they cant be beat.

My replacement XA-2 that I was very happy to find.

They are fun little cameras. I think they are a great little starter camera for someone who wants to get into film, and indeed anyone with more experience who wants a camera that’s easy to pocket. They perform well for any type of snap shots.

Share this post:

Find more similar content on 35mmc

Use the tags below to search for more posts on related topics:

Contribute to 35mmc for an ad-free experience.

There are two ways to contribute to 35mmc and experience it without the adverts:

Paid Subscription – £2.99 per month and you’ll never see an advert again! (Free 3-day trial).

Subscribe here.

Content contributor – become a part of the world’s biggest film and alternative photography community blog. All our Contributors have an ad-free experience for life.

Sign up here.

About The Author

By Chris Davenport
I have been involved in photography from a very young age. I am a second generation photographer. I was in a dark room at a very young age and helped mix chemicals when I could stand on a stool. This stretched into when ever my father could get me to his sporting events as well. Race cars, football, then weddings, and family portraits. He had another job, but his love for photography infected me good. I slowed down for a while in early 2000s when digital came around. I didnt want to make the change. Film was my skill. I didnt think I wanted to invest knowledge and money in the next technology. So I just bought an old used digital Canon and played with it. Film looked all but dead. and all my gear and darkroom went away. In 2017 I was seeing a bit more film and it was looking like it might be an easier hobby to return to. I started to collect and shoot film cameras' again.. I eventually saw film making a strong return and I was ready to get my gear together and have fun. I have not regretted it at all. It is more expensive then days past. It is harder to find good solid cameras. you cant just go to local camera shop and buy the chemicals any more, but the hobby is still very welcoming. My collection today is nearly 150 cameras. All of them work and shoot pictures. Some better then others. If I find a camera, I am more then willing to fix and clean it for film. My darkroom is small but sufficient for the work; medium format, 35mm, 620, 110, 127, 126, 2 1/4 x 3 1/4, 4x5, and lots of others as well. I have ventured out to the digital world and have Canon and Nikon's as well. I might add that I have several UASs and fly for work, SnR, and aerial photography, too. Digital has its place and has definitely changed the photography world. But its so nice to just manipulate the emulsion and soak it in chemicals!
View Profile

Comments

Art Meripol on Olympus XA-2 – An old friend

Comment posted: 26/12/2024

I loved my little XA. Don''t remember if it was a two or not. On my honeymoon in San Francisco in 1994 it broke. I don't remember what broke. But I needed a camera. I didn't take my 'work' cameras with me on the honeymoon of course. So we dropped into a camera store to get another. Not available so I bought the new Nikon Lite Touch AF. Also a wonderful point and shoot but never loved it like I did the XA.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Wim HH van Heugten on Olympus XA-2 – An old friend

Comment posted: 26/12/2024

Nice reading! One correction: The XA-2 has a 4-elements (4-groups) lens. Only the original XA has a 6-elements (5 groups) lens, according to Wikipedia.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Chris Davenport replied:

Comment posted: 26/12/2024

Thanks, I guess I just thought they all had that same 6 element. I bet the XA took incredible pictures too. I think all the XA cameras are worthy of using.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Stephen Barnett on Olympus XA-2 – An old friend

Comment posted: 26/12/2024

I still have my XA-2 from buying it in the early 1980's and it still works perfectly although almost all the paint has come off the rear door. I bought it full price in-the -day and have never regretted it, and even though I got a 'superior' XA at a car boot sale for £5 (simply fixing corroded battery terminals) not long ago my XA-2 is still a better pocket camera. So keep using it, the lens is fantastic and all the 'X' series are epic cameras.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Chris Davenport replied:

Comment posted: 26/12/2024

They arent too difficult to clean and fix. I think they are worth holding on to. Thanks.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

adventurepdx on Olympus XA-2 – An old friend

Comment posted: 27/12/2024

The XA2 is a great little camera! I did a lot with mine in the four years I owned it. But I sold it since I now have an XA, which I really bonded with.

Oh yeah, it looks like the slide with the hot air balloon is backward--look at the positioning (assuming this is in the US) and type on the stop sign.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Chris Davenport replied:

Comment posted: 27/12/2024

Thanks, you are correct. I need to be more aware. I was just liking how sharp the balloon was and didnt even look for backwards. Thanks.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Marcello Stoppini on Olympus XA-2 – An old friend

Comment posted: 27/12/2024

the XA3 was my first real camera, a gift from a close family's friend, it's still working after 40 years flawless, even the seals are good.
In the last 15 years I completed the entire series, and when I travel it's very common for me to carry a XA2 with me, even if I have more or less 40 other cameras. At the moment- for example it's loaded and I'm half the way to complete a cinestill roll, I'm curiosus about the results
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Chris Davenport replied:

Comment posted: 27/12/2024

Did you see a difference in the quality of pictures one from another XA? I understand the XA had better glass and I wondering if it is noticeable enough to make a big difference. Thanks for reading the article.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Andrew Thompson replied:

Comment posted: 27/12/2024

I just shot a roll of Cinestill 800 on my XA3 and was delighted with the results. They’re up on my Instagram if you fancy a look.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Tony Warren on Olympus XA-2 – An old friend

Comment posted: 27/12/2024

I had an XA in my pocket for years and took some good shots with it. The range was one of the best compacts ever produced, especially given when they came out. Like Stephen, the back door on mine lost its paint and the number plate on the Railton(?) in reversed confirming the back-to-front-ness. Nice story.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Andrew Thompson on Olympus XA-2 – An old friend

Comment posted: 28/12/2024

Great read.

The XA3 which I own is definitely one of my favourite cameras. Takes such wonderful photos which need little input on a technical side, just leaving me to consider what it is I want to shoot and how to frame it, and tell a story.

The zone focus can generally be left in the centre (orange position) in most light situations. I read that it was designed to be used this way primarily.

I’ll never part with it, despite having many Point and shoot cameras with better specs.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Chris Davenport replied:

Comment posted: 28/12/2024

I was sad when I gave mine up the first time, and when I got the next one I swore to not give it up again. Thanks for reading.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Jeffery Luhn on Olympus XA-2 – An old friend

Comment posted: 28/12/2024

Chris,
These cameras represent one of the most clever designs in camera history. When the XA came out, many pro photographers in the San Francisco area owned them. We even had a few years of Kodachrome contests. Great images. The shutter died on mine after less than 2 years of mild use. I still have it because it's cute.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Chris Davenport replied:

Comment posted: 28/12/2024

The little cameras seem to be nearly a dime-a-dozen on the auction sites. I love mine. They really have filled a niche for simple quality photography. Thanks

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *