Color is the Subject – Some Success with Color Transparencies

By RichardH

Over the past 50 years I have had periods where I was immersed in photography. First it was B&W darkroom printing, then a long period of color work, a brief time with digital, and now I am focused on B&W film with mechanical cameras. Long ago I had some success with color, meaning that I was able to compose with colors, rather than have colors be a distraction. I have recently tried some color film again, including the reintroduced Ektachrome, but my initial results have been uninspiring. Perhaps I am composing with an eye accustomed to black and white? It does not help that we live near Seattle, where days of bright sun are limited. I am finding that Ektachrome and color negative film are rather sensitive to light temperature, requiring brilliant or “golden hour” sun to produce the hues and saturation I see with my eyes.

A few years ago, I was asked to exhibit my photographs in a local café and bar. I dug out some color slides, or transparencies, from 1980 and 1981. I liked the compositions, so I had them printed on 12 x 18 inch (30 x 45 cm) paper stock. I have a few of these slides to show today, now using my Epson V550 flatbed scanner, and refraining from any post-scan editing. The fuzzy black borders are from the cardboard slide mounts.

When I snapped these photographs, my wife and I lived in a fine old apartment in San Francisco’s downtown. I was surrounded by visual artists. My wife was a medical illustrator who also painted in her free time. We had friends who painted, and for more visual stimulation, we were a short walk from galleries and the modern art museum.

My wife and I shared a Kowa SET-R: a leaf shutter SLR she had used since her college days. While this was an economical camera, the match-needle meter was accurate, and the shutter made a wonderful sequence of mechanical sounds each time it was fired. I thought the 50mm f/1.9 lens was sharp enough and certainly better than my camera handling skills. Mike Eckman has an excellent review of this camera here. After many years of use, the leaf shutter on the Kowa failed. It took it to a shop where a camera repairman refused to work on it, offering disparaging remarks on the quality of our beloved Kowa.

I worked most mornings and evenings, so that left afternoons free for me to walk in the city. The Kowa gave me a reason to leave our apartment. Without a camera, I would have seen very little of my neighborhood. I felt I was acquiring some visual skills with these walks as well.

I was encouraged to use slide film. Transparencies were considered to be the professional film format at the time. I watched my wife make transparencies of her paintings and drawings, learning that this was the format for any submission of serious work. I enjoyed the color reproduction of slide film. When transparencies were projected onto a screen, it was similar to seeing light through a stained-glass window.

Kodachrome and Agfachrome were sold with the manufacturers’ development included. Ektachrome was sold like it is today: without development. I had mixed results with independent processors of Ektachrome, so I began asking for it to be sent away to Kodak’s labs.

San Francisco had a wealth of interesting subjects to photograph. I captured storefronts, cafés, markets, boats, walls, windows, and other street scenes. As I spent time with the Kowa and transparency film, I began to compose photographs based on color as the subject: images defined by colors rather than light and shadow.

Townsend Street
Townsend Street – Kodachrome
Sutter Street
Sutter Street – Kodak Ektachrome
Leavenworth Street
Leavenworth Street – Kodachrome
Pacific Avenue
Pacific Avenue – Kodachrome
California Street
California Street – Kodachrome

Some Kodak Ektar negative color film sits in our refrigerator, waiting for the sun to poke out from the cloud cover. We might see some sun next week…

Share this post:

Find more similar content on 35mmc

Use the tags below to search for more posts on related topics:

Contribute to 35mmc for an ad-free experience.

There are two ways to contribute to 35mmc and experience it without the adverts:

Paid Subscription – £2.99 per month and you’ll never see an advert again! (Free 3-day trial).

Subscribe here.

Content contributor – become a part of the world’s biggest film and alternative photography community blog. All our Contributors have an ad-free experience for life.

Sign up here.

About The Author

By RichardH
My photography obsession began several decades ago, purchasing a compact camera and two rolls of Agfachrome in a Panama duty-free zone. While hoping to snap some travel photos, I soon found that the camera was showing me a new way of seeing the world. I am still learning this craft, and enjoying every minute of it.
View Profile

Comments

Art Meripol on Color is the Subject – Some Success with Color Transparencies

Comment posted: 27/01/2025

This made me miss those days of shooting roll after roll of slide film every week and then laying them out on a light table and it looking like a stained glass window.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

RichardH replied:

Comment posted: 27/01/2025

Thanks for your comment, Art. It sounds as if you were a serious professional. While I was just a hobbyist, I preferred slides to the negative print processing available at the time.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Art Meripol replied:

Comment posted: 27/01/2025

I was staff for 24 years at a large magazine. In the 18 years before going digital I shot travel stories on a weekly basis which was often as many as 25-30 rolls every week. Great days.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ibraar Hussain on Color is the Subject – Some Success with Color Transparencies

Comment posted: 27/01/2025

Thanks very interesting article
How did you find scanning Kodachrome ? Mine has a blue cast
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

RichardH replied:

Comment posted: 27/01/2025

Thank you, Ibraar. I use an Epson V550 flatbed scanner. I set the Epson software to Professional Mode and Positive Film Type, and these are the basic JPEG files it produces. I have recently shot the new Ektachrome, and I scanned it the same way. The Ektachrome does have slight blue cast. I remedy that with a Skylight 1B lens filter and some minor adjustment in post-scan software.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ibraar Hussain replied:

Comment posted: 27/01/2025

Interesting Having read about blue casts on scanned K25 I noticed the same with mine I have the 4990 but mine were scanned by a dear (now sadly passed away) friend on his Minolta Dimage scan multi pro - with the same cast I’m in the process of writing an article about my last 2 rolls of K25

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

RichardH replied:

Comment posted: 27/01/2025

Ah yes! Kodachrome 25 for when the regular 64 ASA version was not saturated enough. I have some K25 transparencies saved from the late 80's. The emulsion is remarkably thick.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Jeffery Luhn on Color is the Subject – Some Success with Color Transparencies

Comment posted: 27/01/2025

Richard,
Thanks for the shots of The City, my home town!
Nobody who has used Kodachrome can forget the warm colors and sharpness of that magical film. I'm sorry UNESCO didn't declare it as a World Heritage Thing and keep the manufacture and processing alive. The world would be a better and brighter place today.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

RichardH replied:

Comment posted: 27/01/2025

Thank you, Jeffery. Yes, Kodachrome and the golden California light made a fine match. Today we do have the re-introduced Ektachrome, scanning solutions, and powerful post-scan software, so I cannot complain.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Gary Smith on Color is the Subject – Some Success with Color Transparencies

Comment posted: 27/01/2025

I never shot color positive film as I had no projector. The idea seemed to me to be that your results needed an audience.
Nice shots in the above.
Thanks for your post!
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

RichardH replied:

Comment posted: 27/01/2025

Thanks, Gary. I also did not have a slide projector when I shot these transparencies. I would visit friends who had a projector and screen, and then show a limited selection of slides. I tried my best to entertain my captive audience.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Jeffery Luhn replied:

Comment posted: 27/01/2025

Gary, Projector parties with fellow photo students were fun, but the real value of transparency films were magazines and brochure printers that required them. I shot loads of it in all formats. It was easy to control in the studio, but bright sunshine was way beyond the acceptable scene brightness range. Also, slides stored in trays got the emulsion eaten by silverfish and other bugs!!! You didn't miss much!

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Bill Watts on Color is the Subject – Some Success with Color Transparencies

Comment posted: 28/01/2025

Nice images.

Many many years ago I switched to using transparency film as the price of the film was similar to print film but the processing cost was far less than that for a print film and 36 enprints. (Scanning was just unheard of in those days!) I was a schoolboy at the time I started and every penny counted! and when I grew up, got married and bought my first home, money was still a consideration and I liked the saturated colours and lack of grain.

I never got on well with Kodachrome and I found Ektachrome too cold but Fuji Sensia, that was the mutt's nuts. Accurate colours, good saturation, reasonably cheap, process paid and fast turn around from the Fuji lab. I shot thousands of photos on Sensia and Sensia II.

I still shoot slide film when I can, I have about 30 rolls of Fuji Velvia / Provia in my freezer and the other day I actually came across a roll of Sensia which has been in the freezer for at least 15 years! Should be ok. I will run it through my Olympus iS 3000 - and see what I get.

Of the print films Ektar 100 is the only one that comes close with Fujifilm C200 as a close runner up.

These days I do not generally project my images, I scan them with a Plustek OpticFilm 120 scanner or an Epson V600 and EpsonScan or VueScan software.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

RichardH replied:

Comment posted: 28/01/2025

Thanks Bill. I also found transparency film to be a good value, but it was a challenge to have it converted to prints. The single step print process had poor saturation, and the double step inter-negative option was very expensive. Today, we have our scanners, software, and color printers. As my children were growing up I wanted prints to share. Fortunately Photography stores offered professional grade negative film for that task.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *