Voigtlander Color-Skopar 21mm f/4 VM P – Made For Film, Can Work For Digital.

By Eric

Ok, that title does not exactly roll off of the tongue. This post will likely not resonate with lens purists seeking M mount perfection. Understandable. But I had found myself in the unenviable position of becoming attached to a less than perfect lens before I realized the full extent of its faults. But, I found a workaround to meet my needs.

As Hamish mentioned in his recent post about the Remaster Slim lens kit, “We chat often via email about whatever latest bit of kit we are playing with…”. A recent exchange I kicked off had to do with the subject of this post, the Voigtlander Color-Skopar 21mm f/4 VM P.

I was sharing that the lens journey started out with promise and then risked going sideways before I found a workable solution… for me. I will explain in more detail below. Then Hamish stated the following:

“I find this sort of thing interesting – we can’t be the only ones out there that geek out to this level?!… …There might be a little article in this if you’d be up for it?”

Where it started

I will spare you my full many year M mount journey. That started years ago before my post here about a group of Artisan lenses. I made peace with them. Then a ZEISS 50mm f/2 ZM entered the fray, followed not long after by a 50mm-ish M mount many for one trade towards a Voigtlander 40mm f/1.2 VM. I like this lens, which despite my prior allegiance to the Artisans put me on the hunt for wide and portrait length Voigtlander M mount lenses. The portrait part of the program went very smoothly. The Voigtlander Heliar Classic 75mm f/1.8 VM is perfect for my needs. On the wide end, I found the Voigtlander Color-Skopar 21mm f/4 VM P. All was well at first. That is an understatement. I immediately became attached to this lens and it unexpectedly displaced my 40mm as my most used lens for daily carry. It was a great fit. Great colors. Sharp wide open. Easy to manual focus and zone focus. Worked perfectly with film.

Before I talk about digital there is something I would like to mention. Since I use aperture priority with my M Typ 240 I manually set the lens profiles so that the shutter speeds are adjusted properly. No lens profile matches, since Leica lenses are listed of course, but I find a lens close enough to get the job done. For the 21mm f/4 I used the Leica 21mm f/2.8 profile. All was well. Was snapping away like a madman and really liked the results.

Then about a week in seemingly out of nowhere a prominent magenta vignette popped up. I was baffled. Why had I not seen this before? Was prominant in photos with light corners. Had I not noticed it before? No. I had plenty of photos like that with few issues. Upon closer review some magenta was found in a few pics…

…but nothing like what I was now seeing now. These photos were unusable as is. Then after some study I realized something.

Wrong in camera profile

The earlier images had the benefit of the Leica 21mm f/2.8 lens profile. With these new unusable images I had switched from the 75mm f/1.8 lens but had left the camera set to the Leica 75mm f/1.25 lens profile. Up to this point I had thought the only thing that the lens profile impacted was the shutter speed. Not so. Had thought if the images were impacted it would be JPEG only modifications. Also not so. Would seem that the selected lens profile impacts the RAW files also. The more you know <insert old time-y PSA star here>.

So… mostly cleaned up. But now I saw it in some images, even faintly, and that will not do. I briefly considered swapping lenses, but I had made a mistake by this point. I was very attached to this lens. It does stuff like this.

I even considered letting it rip and for those files where it bugged me I could crop the magenta vignette out or convert them to black and white…

…but that was not a proper fix. Then I found another way.

Lightroom lens profile

To my surprise there was a Voigtlander Color-Skopar 21mm f/4 VM P lens profile in Lightroom. Even with the messy magenta images created with the wrong 75mm in camera profile I found that the Lightroom lens profile mostly cleaned things up. But then I realized that it would basically rid me of the magenta menace entirely if the in camera profile was used also.

Here is the image with only the in camera Leica 21mm f/2.8 lens profile applied.

A bit messy at the edges. Here is the same image with nothing else, but the Lightroom Voigtlander Color-Skopar 21mm f/4 VM P lens profile applied.

Are there still issues? Yes. An odd green cast is created in some images. I purposely chose the worst offender for this example above. But in most scenarios this does the trick. For example:

Perfect?

Far from it. Good enough for my purposes? Yes. Here are some of my favorite images so far.

To recap

Film: No issues.

Digital M: A bit of faffing about is required. Either the in camera Leica 21mm f/2.8 profile or the Lightroom Voigtlander Color-Skopar 21mm f/4 VM P lens profile should be applied. Otherwise cropping or a black and white conversion may be in your future. For best results apply both profiles.

For everyone? Certainly not. A bit much? Yes. But a small price to pay for my purposes to keep a lens I really like.

The Artisan lenses had a good multi year run. But I have now successfully completed my Voigtlander M mount lens trio.

Happy capturing.

Eric L. Woods

I shoot a variety of new and old digital and film cameras. Industrial Engineer by education, IT is my vocation, and I really enjoy using, testing, and writing about cameras. All three of the latter are very therapeutic exercises for me. If you are so inclined my blog address is ewoodsphoto.com and I can be found on Threads and Instagram. All the best to you.

 

Share this post:

Find more similar content on 35mmc

Use the tags below to search for more posts on related topics:

Contribute to 35mmc for an ad-free experience.

There are two ways to contribute to 35mmc and experience it without the adverts:

Paid Subscription – £2.99 per month and you’ll never see an advert again! (Free 3-day trial).

Subscribe here.

Content contributor – become a part of the world’s biggest film and alternative photography community blog. All our Contributors have an ad-free experience for life.

Sign up here.

About The Author

By Eric
I shoot a variety of new and old digital and film cameras. Industrial Engineer by education, IT is my vocation, and I really enjoy using, testing, and writing about cameras. All three of the latter are very therapeutic exercises for me.
View Profile

Comments

Ibraar Hussain on Voigtlander Color-Skopar 21mm f/4 VM P – Made For Film, Can Work For Digital.

Comment posted: 28/01/2025

Thanks for the interesting article man!
I doubt I’ll ever get the chance to use exotic beauties like these
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Eric replied:

Comment posted: 28/01/2025

Thank you Ibraar. Much appreciated. I am glad there is relatively affordable glass like this available for M mount. I paid little more than $300 for both the 75mm and 21mm.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Carl Follstad on Voigtlander Color-Skopar 21mm f/4 VM P – Made For Film, Can Work For Digital.

Comment posted: 28/01/2025

Where's that camera store located? I need to make sure I avoid going there!

I enjoyed the review. I own that lens and shot it on my M7 many years ago with my big thumb print (carelessly) left on the rear lens element. Yeah, not a real helpful thing for image quality and, unfortunately, I didn't find out until I got home and had all the slides developed. Otherwise, small and light, I really liked it for what it cost and could do. I still have it.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Eric replied:

Comment posted: 28/01/2025

Carrboro, NC. While dangerous for my wallet I only half jokingly call it my happy place. Thank you for the kind words. Much appreciated. Agreed. It's a great little lens for a reasonable sum.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Raymond Tsang on Voigtlander Color-Skopar 21mm f/4 VM P – Made For Film, Can Work For Digital.

Comment posted: 28/01/2025

Hi Eric,

Nice post. Your post makes me want to dig up this lens from my dry cabinet and shoot it again in my M262. Previously I set it to a 21mm lens profile in the camera and got a bad magenta cast in the edges (I only shoot raw). Then I apply the LR lens profile and it overcorrected the vignetting. Maybe I should do more experimentation with different lens profiles.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Eric replied:

Comment posted: 28/01/2025

Hello. Not a lens I can endorse for digital with a clear conscious honestly but this workaround suited my purposes. I shoot RAW only also, which is why I was surprised that the in camera profile made a difference. Would be curious to hear how things went if you did take it out. Here is my full gallery with it using film and digital. https://flic.kr/s/aHBqjBUqBY

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Gary Smith on Voigtlander Color-Skopar 21mm f/4 VM P – Made For Film, Can Work For Digital.

Comment posted: 28/01/2025

I also have this lens and while I purchased it for the M3, I have also shot it on the 42mp Sony a7R3. I'm now curious about the FunLeader Artizlab 35/1.4.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Eric replied:

Comment posted: 28/01/2025

Thank you for reading the post. I saw that Artizlab 35/1.4. Looks like a fun lens.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Art Meripol on Voigtlander Color-Skopar 21mm f/4 VM P – Made For Film, Can Work For Digital.

Comment posted: 28/01/2025

thanks for sharing where that camera store is. Wish I could get there. And thanks for sharing the story too. I have that lens and love it. But I only shoot B&W film with it on my old M4p so I am unlikely to run into your issues. It's a fabulous little lens for my B&W work.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Eric replied:

Comment posted: 28/01/2025

Thank you for the kind words. That is a perfect use case for this lens.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Daniel Castelli on Voigtlander Color-Skopar 21mm f/4 VM P – Made For Film, Can Work For Digital.

Comment posted: 29/01/2025

Hi Eric,
I bought this lens twice. Why? We forget pain. I used it on my M2 & CL. I had the aux. viewfinder ‘for accurate framing and composing’. It’s tiny, sharp, and because of physical characteristics, the f/4.0 can yield sharp photos under available light while hand-held. The problem? It’s 21 mm. I always became uncomfortable when using the lens around people. To fully exploit the wide view, you need to move in close so you don’t get vast, vacant foregrounds. I feel I’m invading personal space. I’m uncomfortable getting that close. I don’t do landscapes, so..
To make matters worse, I seem to always get my shadow in the shot. Now, to make matters worse, worse, I just was gifted a 20mm Nikkor to use on my FE2. I tried to refuse, but lost.
I know they are great lenses, people shoot stunning photos with them, but not me. Sigh.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Eric replied:

Comment posted: 29/01/2025

"We forget pain." I felt that. Have done the same when it comes to repurchasing gear. I don't do landscape much either. The few you see are taken in passing as a that looks alright snap. But not much care is taken. I used to get temporarily fascinated with wide angle lenses before reverting back to longer focal lengths. Since then for reasons I can not quite pin down I have grown to appreciate wider primes in recent years. The discomfort I used to feel about invading personal space has subsided. I do my best to read the room, approach when they seem game, will also ask if I am not sure, and to my surprise, I have yet to receive any pushback. A turning point for me was a 2021 NYC photo walk that included a stranger portrait session in Harlem. We approached strangers and every single person was receptive. That was at portrait focal lengths but I have become more comfortable with wide lenses also since then. https://ewoodsphoto.com/2021/08/10/nyc-gallery-part-1-harlem-wonderful-and-amazing-stranger-portraits/

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Steve Badolato on Voigtlander Color-Skopar 21mm f/4 VM P – Made For Film, Can Work For Digital.

Comment posted: 29/01/2025

Thanks for the timely article. I'm in Fuji land and I think I always will be. I considered going Nikon, but I just like the way the Fuji handles. I have also owned this 21mm twice. I'm considering getting it again, but also interested in the Voigtlander 23mm 1.2 However, it would be less expensive to grab the 21mm over the 23mm. Having the extra few stops of light doesn't really befront me considering IBIS, but I'm still torn, so I'll probably pick up both and see how it goes.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Eric replied:

Comment posted: 29/01/2025

Fuji is an excellent choice. I have gone with Fuji a couple of times. I have a digital main system brand and a number of others for fun and leisure, but could get on with any brand. Film? Hopelessly out of control. I agree with your assessment that the aperture difference between the 21mm and 23mm alone would not sway me. Best of luck with one or both depending on which was you go.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *