HassyPB back on Hasselblad 503cx

HassyPB Review – It Makes Photos That People Want To Take From You

By Nick Orloff

This is a review of the HassyPB, but before I tell you about that bit of kit, let me take a short diversion to tell you how I arrived here.

I enjoy a little bit of instant photography but I’ve never been a huge fan. I bought a Polaroid SLR 680 several years ago, burnt through a few packs of what seems to be stupidly expensive film but never really caught the bug.

Almost 4 years ago – March 2020 – I saw Escura’s Hasselback Portrait on Kickstarted and thought “Instax film on my Hasselblad 503, that sounds like fun!”, so I took the plunge, committed to the campaign, and had about US$200 taken from my credit card a month or so later.

Their back was due to be delivered in July 2020… but, after over three years of excuses, including Covid (not their fault) they started delivering. This isn’t supposed to be a post criticising Escura and their Hasselback (that would be like shooting fish in a barrel) but comments and feedback from the early recipients were very negative, citing poor build quality and focusing issues (a bit more on that later).

For a moment, let’s head off on a tangent… how’s your GAS? Are you still using the accessory/lens/gadget that you just had to have 4 years ago? I’m still using some of the lenses and bodies I bought some years ago, but not much else, especially when it comes to accessories. I accept that my GAS is not an investment strategy, it’s how I spend money for my hobby.

In September last year, while I was waiting for my Hasselback to arrive, having read all the negative reviews, especially those that talked about the damage the Escura back could do to a Hasselblad body, I decided that the money I spent almost 4 years ago was a sunk cost and I probably wasn’t going to use the back if/when it arrived anyway.

That being said, the idea of using my Hasselblad, with its beautiful lenses, and Instax film had stuck in my head. And so, a bit of time playing with Google later I found the HassyPB and its inventor/manufacturer John Kasawa. John is based in Bangkok, and I happened to be heading to Thailand in November for a short holiday… A few WhatApp messages later and John had agreed to let me test drive one of his HassyPBs when I was in Bangkok before I parted with my cash.

Mr HassyPB, John Kasawa
Mr. HassyPB, John Kasawa

John & I had a great hour in the hotel lobby, talking photography, taking photos of each other and some of the hotel staff, and it didn’t really take much effort for me to hand over my US$400 and bring home a HassyPB.

From what I can tell, it’s well made, it feels solid in my hands and connects easily & snugly to my Hasselblad 503CX.

There is an issue around focusing. The NONS back has the Instax’s film plane at the same distance from the lens as a regular Hasselblad film back, while the HassyPB’s is a little further away, meaning you need to compensate by lifting the focusing screen to achieve accurate focus. HassyPB includes an aluminium spacer (are you paying attention Escura?) that sits under the focusing screen to correct focusing. It’s a one minute job to swap it, but it means you lose the ability to swap between the Instax back and a regular one without a bit of messing about – maybe you can’t easily use it to test a lighting setup before you commit to exposing negative/transparency film. This was what instant film might have been used for “back in the day” but I don’t see this as a big issue – if I really want to check lighting & composition before committing to film I’ll use a digital camera.

Champagne glasses, Instax Square B&W
Cheers!
Extension tube test, Instax Square B&W
Extension tube test

And changing the distance from lens to film plane means you can’t focus to infinity. OK, it’s an issue, but I didn’t buy a HassyPB to create landscape images.

Infinity Test at f/22, Instax Square B&W
Infinity Test at f/22

Instax film certainly doesn’t seem to have the dynamic range / exposure latitude of, say, HP5, but I find that’s part of the charm – they’re (close enough to) instant, they’re not perfect. And they are hard evidence that I need to improve my handheld meter technique.

Still life, Instax Square B&W
Still life

Hasselblad makes a 60mm X 60mm image, Instax Square is 62mm x 62mm, resulting in a thin (1mm) black border around the image. Again, for me, this is part of the charm.

In Australia, Instax Square is about a third the price of Polaroid 600, and ‘cheap’ enough I’m happy to play around and experiment to see what it’ll do. But what I’m really enjoying is people’s reactions to the images I’m creating. At two recent dinners I brought the ‘Blad and HassyPB along to make both portraits and candid photos, and had very few left at the end of the evening – nearly everyone, even my friend who (allegedly) hates having her photo taken left with a couple tucked into her handbag.

To me the appeal is tied to how often we see real printed images. For most folks, it’s quite rare these days – especially to see a physical/printed image of yourself. We’re so used to looking at images on screens that when we see one ‘printed’ is a lovely novelty, and perhaps something of a keepsake.

Portrait in warm lighting
Portrait, Instax Square
Always happy to have his photo taken

In short, am I likely to be carting the HassyPB along to gatherings of friends for the foreseeable future? Yes. I think I’m safe in saying that I am. This bit of GAS was ultimately quenched with a piece of kit that will remain in regular rotation.

Nick Orloff
You can more of my images on my website and Instagram

Share this post:

Find more similar content on 35mmc

Use the tags below to search for more posts on related topics:

Contribute to 35mmc for an ad-free experience.

There are two ways to contribute to 35mmc and experience it without the adverts:

Paid Subscription – £2.99 per month and you’ll never see an advert again! (Free 3-day trial).

Subscribe here.

Content contributor – become a part of the world’s biggest film and alternative photography community blog. All our Contributors have an ad-free experience for life.

Sign up here.

About The Author

By Nick Orloff
Lots of film, plenty of digital, incurable GAS and a list of unfinished photography projects that could keep me busy for the next 10 years.
View Profile

Comments

Julian on HassyPB Review – It Makes Photos That People Want To Take From You

Comment posted: 29/03/2024

Thanks for sharing. I had been keeping an eye on Instax backs for Hasselblad for several years and finally took the plunge and bought the Nons back a few months ago. It's well made, and I find it works really well. Personally, retaining the film plane is a killer feature as I like being able to switch backs quickly. I like to take portraits where I take one for me, on film, and one for the sitter - on Instax so they can take it away. The PB sounds like a good alternative though. Julian
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Nick Orloff replied:

Comment posted: 29/03/2024

Julian, It take a little bit of messing around, so the NONS might be a better choice if you're switching back and forth.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

David Hume on HassyPB Review – It Makes Photos That People Want To Take From You

Comment posted: 29/03/2024

Nice to read this Nick, and compare with my experience of the NONS. I'm still happy with the NONS. In the mean time the HVSQ seems to be shipping finally but I've not seen a review of that one yet. Cheers
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Nick Orloff replied:

Comment posted: 29/03/2024

David, The NONS seems to be a little easier to switch back and forth with, but I'm very happy with my HassyPB.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *